Anatomical variations and morphometric analysis of the internal iliac artery branching patterns in Thai cadavers

Authors

  • Nongnuch Kanharat College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubonratchathani University
  • Suthankamon Khrongyut Research Group for Biomedical Research and Innovative Development (RG-BRID), College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani University
  • Piyanan Mevatee College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubonratchathani University
  • Thanaphop Karoon College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubonratchathani University
  • Sittichai Thongsaeng College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubonratchathani University
  • Chomchanok Donsamak College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubonratchathani University
  • Nitiwadee Srinual College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubonratchathani University, Thailand
  • Mantarinee Kanharat Faculty of Architecture ,Khon Kaen University
  • Ratana Leksomboon Research Group for Biomedical Research and Innovative Development (RG-BRID), College of Medicine and Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani University

Keywords:

Internal iliac artery, Anatomical variations, Thai cadavers

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the anatomical features and classify branching patterns of the internal iliac artery (IIA) in 22 Thai cadavers (44 hemipelvises) using Adachi classification. The results showed that the origin of the IIA was most commonly at the L5–S1 intervertebral disc level (45.5%), and the bifurcation into anterior and posterior divisions mostly occurred at the S1 vertebral level (43.2%). The mean IIA length was 37.96±12.78 mm (range 12.20–71.57 mm), with no statistically significant differences between right and left sides or between male and female. The most frequent branching pattern was Type I (77.27%), followed by Type II (15.91%), and Type III (6.82%), while Type IV and Type V were not observed. Global population data indicating Type I as the most common pattern, suggesting that IIA anatomy in Thai individuals is consistent with the general worldwide profile. However, the wide range of IIA length highlights considerable individual variation, which may influence surgical and radiological planning. This study provides an important anatomical reference for pelvic surgeons and radiologists, helping to reduce vascular injury risks and improve safety during pelvic interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Moore’s Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2022.

Francis YM, Balaji T, Rajendran HSR, Gnanasundaram V, Subramanian A, Karunakaran B. Study on Variations in the Origin and Branching Pattern of Internal Iliac Artery in Cadavers. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2018; 11(4): 2201-7.

Mamatha H, Hemalatha B, Vinodini P, Souza AS, Suhani S. Anatomical study on the variations in the branching pattern of internal iliac artery. Indian J Surg. 2015; 77 (Suppl 2): 248-52.

Takenaka Y, Beppu N, Otani M, Kazuma I, Imada A, Matsubara T, et al. Anatomical validation of internal iliac vessels assessed by three-dimensional angiographic analysis. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2023; 7(3): 186-96.

Adachi B. Das Arteriensystem der Japaner. Bd. II. Kyoto: Die Kaiserlich Japanische Universität zu Kyoto (Maruzen); 1928. p. 136-42.

Yamaki K, Saga T, Doi Y, Aida K, Yoshizuka M. A statistical study of the branching of the human internal iliac artery. Kurume Med J. 1998; 45(4): 333-40.

Koziej M, Toppich J, Wilk J, Plutecki D, Ostrowski P, Fijałkowska M, et al. The anatomy of the internal iliac artery: a meta-analysis. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2024; 83(3): 517-30.

Badagabettu SN, Padur AA, Shetty SD. Variations in the branching pattern of the internal iliac artery and its implications in trauma and surgery – a South Indian cadaveric study. J Vasc Bras. 2025; 24: e20240075.

Yevstifeieva A, Krzeszowiak J, Lastovetskyi I, Mazurek A. Variations in branching patterns of internal iliac artery according to Adachi’s classification – literature review and presentation of a case. Transl Res Anat. 2021; 24: 100119.

Boonruangsri P, Suwannarong B, Chaisiwamongkol K, Hipkaeo W, Toomsan Y, Iamsaard S. Morphometric analysis of the iliac arterial lengths in normal and abnormal aortoiliac arteries (tortuosity, kinking and aneurysm) conditions. Srinagarind Med J. 2015; 30(4): 352-7.

Sakthivelavan S, Aristotle S, Sivanandan A, Sendiladibban S, Felicia Jebakani C. Variability in the Branching Pattern of the Internal Iliac Artery in Indian Population and Its Clinical Importance. Anat Res Int. 2014; 2014: 597103.

Hajdyła P, Ostrowski P, Bonczar M, Gliwa J, Nasser A, Shafarenko K, et al. Exploring the branching pattern of the posterior division of the internal iliac artery: an analysis based on 75 computed tomography angiographies. Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35: 2171-80.

Ongidi IH, Amuti TM, Abdulsalaam FY, Shani GK, Ouko IP, Otieno EH, et al. Variability in morphology and branching of the internal iliac artery: Implications for pelvic surgery. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2021; 21: 100097.

Mohammadbaigi H, Darvishi M, Moayeri A. Variations of anterior and posterior division of internal iliac artery: A systematic review and clinical implications. Biomedical Research and Therapy. 2019; 6(5): 3189-206.

Bleich AT, Rahn DD, Wieslander CK, Wai CY, Roshanravan SM, Corton MM. Posterior division of the internal iliac artery: anatomic variations and clinical applications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;197(6):658.e1-658.e5.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Kanharat, N., Khrongyut, S., Mevatee, P., Karoon, T., Thongsaeng, S., Donsamak, C., Srinual, N., Kanharat, M., & Leksomboon, R. (2026). Anatomical variations and morphometric analysis of the internal iliac artery branching patterns in Thai cadavers. Journal of Medicine and Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani University, 9(2), 166–174. retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmpubu/article/view/290319

Issue

Section

Research Articles