Outcomes of Providing Pharmaceutical Care during Home Visit in Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Main Article Content

Kamonchanok Boonmark
Saithip Suttiruksa

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of pharmaceutical care provision during home visits in patients with warfarin with those in patients with usual care. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in adult patients with 18 years old or over, being residents in Phupaman district and receiving at least one time of treatment with warfarin for a continuous period of no less than 3 months. Fifty-six participants were randomly allocated into experimental and control groups with 28 subjects per group. The study prospectively collected International Normalized Ratio (INR) and drug related problems (DRPs) before intervention and at 1, 2 and 3 months after intervention. Knowledge regarding warfarin in experimental group was measured at before intervention, immediately after intervention and at 1, 2 and 3 months after intervention. Results: At the baselines, patient characteristics were not significantly different between groups. At the end of the study, percentage of patients with INR within target range in experimental group was significantly higher than that in control group (75.00% and 46.43%, respectively; P=0.029). Mean score of knowledge in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of control group statistical (17.64±0.56 and 16.61±1.17, respectively; P<0.001). Percentage of time with INR being in therapeutic range (%TTR) at the end of the study in the experimental group tended to be higher than that in control group (59.52±34.38 and 51.19±41.06, respectively; P=0.414) but with no statistically significant differences. The reduction of DRPs tended to be larger in experimental group, compared to that in control group. Within experimental group, DRPs decreased and knowledge increased overtime (P<0.001 for both variables), while proportion of patients with INR within target range was higher but with no statistically significant differences.  Conclusion: Pharmaceutical care provision during home visits increased proportion of patients with INR within target range and their knowledge regarding warfarin therapy, and decreased DRPs.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Heart Association of Thailand. Warfarin guideline [online]. 2010 [cited Jan 1, 2020]. Available from: www.thaiheart.org/index.php?lay=show&ac=article&Id=539252670&Ntype=5.

Health Administration Division, Ministry of Public Health. Service plan: warfarin clinic management. Nonthaburi: Bangkok; 2016

Chaiklang W. Drug therapy problems in outpatients using warfarin at Lumphun Hospital. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University; 2014.

Katemateegaroon D, Jarensiripornkul N. Warfarin-related problems: Implementation of anticoagulation clinic. Srinagarind Medical Journal 2002; 17: 281-8.

Loharattanakong P, Ritthiboon P, Hongrinya Y, Chaichun M, Taksinachanekij S, Uchaipichat V. Warfarin using knowledge and international normalized ratio goal control in outpatients of Queen Sirikit Heart Canter of the Northeast. Srinagarind Medical Journal 2016; 31: 257-65.

Leekcharoen S, Anantachoti P. An evaluation of pharmacist counseling to patients receiving warfarin at Samutprakarn Hospital. Thai Pharma ceutical and Health Science Journal 2011; 6: 91-9

Office of the Council of State. Thai National Health Act 2002 [online]. 2002 [cited Jun 1, 2021]. Availa ble from: nih.dmsc.moph.go.th/law/pdf/031.pdf.

Stafford L, van Tienen EC, Bereznicki LR, Peterson GM. The benefits of pharmacist delivered warfarin education in the home. Int J Pharm Pract. 2012; 20: 384-9.

Saokaew S, Permsuwan U, Chaiyakunapruk N, Nathisuwan S, Sukonthasarn A. Effectiveness of pharmacist participated warfarin therapy manage ment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemostasis. 2010; 8: 2418-27.

Jackson SL, Peterson G, Vial J, Jupe D. Improving the outcomes of anticoagulation: an evaluation of home follow up of warfarin initiation. J Intern Med. 2004; 256: 137-44.

Sukanantachai B, Sapoo U, Supsinwiwat A, Pongrithsakda W, Tangsriseree N, Kanokhong S. Implementation and outcome evaluation of satellite network of anticoagulation clinics in Nakornratcha sima province, Thailand. Journal of Health Systems Research 2011; 5: 495-505

Maneekanlaya S. Family and community pharmacist practice learning 1 (FCPL 1). In: Chantakarn A. editors. Home visit project with pharmaceutical care in patients starting warfarin in hospital among Mueang Nakhon Sawan District; National Health Security Office; 2016. p 98-116.

Thaungsuwan W, Jedsadayanmata A. Effect of pharmacist participation in multidisciplinary yeam for home visit on blood pressure and drug adherence of stroke patients. Thai Journal of Phar macy Practice. 2016; 8: 48-57.

Hepler CD SL. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990; 47: 533-43.

Ningsanon T, Monthakarnkul P, Wanakmanee U, Suansanea T, Chatuporn T. Textbook of family pharmacist. Bangkok: Association of Hospital Pharmacy (Thailand); 2014.

Wangsook P, Kittiboonyakun P, Sookaneknun P. Evaluation of multidisciplinary health care program for patients using warfarin at Health Promotion Sub-District Hospitals. Thai Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2014; 6: 92-105.

Sittidach M, Muhammad P, Malanusorn M, Kiettanawattana P, Boonupathamkul T. Effect of pharmaceutical care on patients with mechanical prosthetic valve who received warfarin at Songkla nagarind Hospital. Songklanakarind Medical Jour nal 2012; 2: 63-73

Stafford L, Peterson GM, Bereznicki LR, Jackson SL, van Tienen EC, Angley MT, et al. Clinical outcomes of a collaborative, home-based postdis charge warfarin management service. Ann Pharma cother. 2011; 45: 325-34.

Holbrook AM, Pereira JA, Labiris R, McDonald H, Douketis JD, Crowther M, et al. Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food inter actions. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 1095-106.