Evaluation of a Combined Method of Rapid Survey and Focus Group Discussion to Identify Problems Related to Medicines and Health Products in Community: A Case Study of Non Hua Na Village, Srisook Subdistrict, Si Chomphu District, Khon Kaen Province

Main Article Content

สุชาดา กาบิน
ทิพาพร กาญจนราช
ดุจฤดี ชินวงศ์

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the appropriateness in using rapid survey technique in combination with focus group discussion to identify problems related to medicines and health products in 4 aspects including 1) community participation 2) self-dependency of community in using the methods 3) use of existing community resources and 4) correspondence with community’s time of activities. Methods: The study was the evaluation of process in a field experiment. Subjects were 22 villagers of Non Huw Na in Srisook subdistrict, Sri Chomphu district, Khon Kaen Province (n=72). The subjects were those leading the design, planning and identification of the problems during October 2017. Prior to the start of the activities, the researchers trained the subjects and distribute manual for problem identification to be used as activity guideline. Evaluation of the appropriateness of the method for problem identification included (1) the completion of evaluation and observation form by researchers, (2) the response of subjects on questionnaires asking their opinion on the survey and focus group discussion. Results: Evaluation of the use of rapid survey and focus group discussion by the researchers and subjects was in agreement on (1) the method attained high degree of community participation (2) community could independently run the process (3) the method relied on the existing resources in community and (4) time span to conduct problem identification corresponded with community’s activities. The aspects of the method that community was not able to execute by themselves were the design of survey questionnaire, analysis and summarization of the survey data. Conclusion:  Rapid survey and focus group discussion were appropriate techniques to identify community problems related to medicines and health products. Primary care pharmacists responsible for community health should explore techniques to strengthen community capacity in questionnaire design and simple data analysis so that the community could independently identify their own problems.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

1. Prapunwattana M. Standard of hospital pharmacy 2012; 7: 189-99.

2. Haber D. Community-oriented primary care: applying the model to a senior center. Fam Community Health 1996; 19: 33-9.

3. Wilson J, Tingle J. Clinical risk modification: a route to clinical governance. Oxford; Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999. p.39-64.

4. Wasi P. Improved technique for detecting intraery- throcytic inclusion group discussion by the Apprecia- tion-Influence-Control (A-I-C) procedure. J Public Health 1999; 59: 192-97.

5. Cooperrider DL, Whitney D, Stavros J. Appreciative inquiry handbook. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler publisher; 2005.

6. Kanjanarach T, Health care of a community to manage medicine and health product. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University printing; 2017.

7. Kanjanasuang M, Traiwichitkhun D. An analysis of problems in and guidelines for time management of teachers: mix methods research. Online J Educ 2015; 10: 274-88.

8. Wiwangsu P, Ratanaubol A, Boonprakob P. Develop- ment of a transformative learning model for alcoholic rehabilitation treatment. SDU Res J 2013; 9: 217-31.

9. Jiasakul S, Trirattanapirom, Piriyapun P, Ittisat P. Development a model of rapid survey for health promotion programmes [online]. 1996 [cited Sep 9, 2018]. Available from: advisor.anamai.moph.go.th/ main.php?filename=JHealthVol19No2_03.

10. Buason R. Qualitative method in education research . 3rd ed. Bangkok: Kumsamai Printing; 2009.

11. Bureau of Agricultural Economic Research. Poverty incidence of Thai agricultural households [online]. 2009. [cited Sep 9, 2018] Available from: oldweb.oae .go.th/download/resech/2556/2.55research-Poverty incidence05072556.pdf

12. Drug Act, B.E. 2510. Royal Gazette No. 84, Part 101 special (Oct 20, 1967).

13. Food Act, B.E. 2522. Royal Gazette No. 96, Part 79 special (May 13, 1979).

14.Cosmetic Act B.E. 2558. Royal Gazette No. 132, Part 86A (Sep 8, 2015).

15.Hazardous Substance Act, B.E. 2535. Royal Gazette No. 109, Part 39 (Apr 6, 1992).

16. Psychotropic Substances Act, B.E. 2559. Royal Gazette No. 133, Part 107A (Dec 20, 2016).

17. Narcotics Act, B.E. 2562. Royal Gazette No. 136, Part 19A (Feb 18, 2019).

18. Medical Device Act, B.E. 2551. Royal Gazette No. 125, Part 43A (Mar 5, 2008).

19. Volatile Substance Act, B.E. 2533. Royal Gazette No. 107, Part 13 special (Jan 19, 1990).

20. Rittilun S, Sridakaew N, Suwannabobpha S, Tein yud S, Fangsaken B. The development process of test and questionnaire construction skills for Kalasin university students. Phae Wa Kalasin J Kalasin University 2016;3:27-44.

21. Thorndike EL. Human learning. New York: Johnson; 1931.

22. Dachatik S, Pinlu T, Ponpong J. Problem solving communial research. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen Printing; 2017.

23. Kanjanawasi S. Evaluation theory. Bangkok: Chula- longkorn University Printing; 1993.