Prognostic Factors Affecting Outcomes of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage (PCD) in Liver Abscess Treatment

Outcomes of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage (PCD) in Liver Abscess Treatment

Authors

  • Wiwat Thitsayakorn Department of Radiology, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital
  • Chawalit Lakdee Department of Radiology, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital

Keywords:

liver abscess, percutaneous catheter drainage, treatment duration, hematocrit

Abstract

Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) is the mainstay treatment for liver abscesses; however, factors influencing the duration of catheter placement remain unclear. This retrospective study aimed to identify factors associated with treatment outcomes in patients with liver abscesses managed by PCD. We reviewed 94 patients diagnosed with liver abscess who underwent PCD between 2015 and 2025. Most patients were male (59.7%) with a mean age of 57 years. Sixty-two patients (66%) had catheter removal within 45 days. Univariate analysis revealed that a hematocrit (Hct) level below 29% was significantly associated with an increased risk of prolonged catheterization beyond 45 days (relative risk 2.90; 95% CI 1.34-6.28; p = 0.007). Other factors, including sex, age, number of abscesses, abscess size, and location, were not significantly associated with catheter duration. In conclusion, anemia (Hct < 29%) is a significant predictor of prolonged catheter duration in patients with liver abscesses treated with PCD. Early assessment of anemia should be considered, as it is associated with prolonged catheter duration. However, anemia may reflect underlying disease severity or chronic conditions, and it remains unclear whether correction of anemia would directly improve outcomes. Further studies should be conducted to determine the impact of correcting anemia on outcomes

References

Poovorawan K, Pan-ngum W, Soonthornworasiri N, Kulrat C, Kittitrakul C, Wilairatana P, et al. Burden of liver abscess and survival risk score in Thailand: A population-based study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016;95(3):683–8.

Chotiwarangkul W. Liver abscess in Sawanpracharak Hospital. Sawanpracharak Med J 2017;14(2):51–9.

Laopaiboon V, Aphinives C, Prawiset P. Comparison of clinical success between CT-guided percutaneous drainage and open surgical drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collection in Srinagarind Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2010;93(Suppl 3):S45-51.

Ratchatasettakul K, Intaraprasong P, Kiertiburanakul S. Epidemiology of liver abscess in Thailand during the past decade. Intern J Infect Dis 2012;16(Suppl 1):e227. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.832

Chanyaswat J. Liver abscess in Prapokklao Hospital. J Prapokklao Hosp Clin Med Educat Center 2008;25(2):106-13.

Zerem E, Hadzic A. Sonographically guided percutaneous catheter drainage versus needle aspiration in the management of pyogenic liver abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(3):W138–W142. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2173

Kumar S, Midha NK, Ahari K, Kumar D, Gopalakrishnan M, Kumar B, et al. Role of pigtail catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration in the management of liver abscess: A retrospective analysis. Cureus 2021;13(12):e20528. doi:10.7759/cureus.20528

Mahmoud A, Abuelazm M, Ahmed AAS, Elshinawy M, Abdelwahab OA, Abdalshafy H, et al. Percutaneous catheter drainage versus needle aspiration for liver abscess: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Ann Transl Med 2023;11(5):190. doi:10.21037/atm-22-4663

Bittaye SO, Tamba S, Joof S, Jaw M, Cham M, Jarjue L, et al. Clinical characteristics and management of liver abscess in The Gambia, a resource-limited country. BMC Gastroenterol 2024;24(1):275. doi:10.1186/s12876-024-03375-9

Aung YH, Oung T. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter drainage in liver abscesses. J Med Glob 2022;1(2):72-9.

Wise SW, Kavic SM, Chdzanowski FA Jr, Rothberg BJ, Cynamon J, Kinkhabwala M, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: What radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185(6):1464–71.

Schertz PJ, Mao CA, Derrick KD, Galar F, Ortiz CB, Walker JA, et al. Biliary leaks: Multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment. Radiographics 2024;44(7):e230155. doi:10.1148/rg.230155

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30