The Effectiveness of the Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC)-Based Artificial Saliva in Head and Neck Cancer Patients after Radiotherapy

The Effectiveness of Artificial Saliva in Head and Neck Cancer Patients after Radiotherapy

Authors

  • Marisa Masorn Department of Dentistry, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital

Keywords:

artificial saliva, carboxymethyl cellulose, xerostomia, head and neck cancer, radiotherapy

Abstract

Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital provides dental care for head and neck cancer patients who suffer from xerostomia after radiotherapy. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) artificial saliva in 48 patients who received services between May 2024 and February 2025. They were divided into an experimental group (CMC artificial saliva) and a control group (drinking water), 24 patients in each group. Xerostomia was evaluated before and after one month of use with an 11-item Thai version of the dry mouth questionnaire. Stimulated saliva was measured by the Saxon test, and pH was tested with litmus paper. Baseline data were similar except for gender and age, which differed significantly (p < 0.001). After one month, xerostomia scores significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.05), especially for nighttime dryness, dry mouth sensation, and swallowing difficulty. However, there were no differences in salivary flow or pH between groups. This study concludes that the hospital’s CMC artificial saliva can effectively reduce xerostomia symptoms in head and neck cancer patients post-radiotherapy when used for one month but does not affect saliva quantity or pH.

References

National Cancer Institute. Department of Medical Services. Ministry of Public Health Thailand. Hospital-based cancer registry 2021 [homepage on the internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Nov 9]. Available from: URL:ttps://www.nci.go.th/th/cancer_record/download/HOSPITAL-BASED_2021.pdf

Abati S, Bramati C, Bondi S, Lissoni A, Trimarchi M. Oral cancer and precancer: A narrative review on the relevance of early diagnosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(24):9160. doi:10.3390/ijerph17249160

Agarwal JP, Baijal G, Kar R. Radiation-induced xerostomia. Int J Head Neck Surg 2013;3(2):82–6.

Plemons JM, Al-Hashimi I, Marek CL. Managing xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction: executive summary of a report from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145(8):867–73.

Das P, Challacombe SJ. Dry mouth and clinical oral dryness scoring systems. Prim Dent J 2016;5(1):77–9.

Bakhshi M, Manifar S, Azizi N, Shabestari SB, Mardi AH, Shirinbak I, et al. Efficacy of Bioxtra spray and mouthwash in patients with radiation-induced xerostomia: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Exp Dent Sci 2016;3(1):19–23.

Ingle EN. Artificial saliva for therapeutic management of xerostomia: A structured review. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2020;14(1):32–6.

Thianmontri A. Gel-ball type artificial saliva [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Oct 21]. Available from: https://www.thailandtechshow.com/view_techno.php?id=1527

Sema P, Wattana P, Wat D. Xerostomia: Management and outcomes in head and neck cancer patients after radiotherapy. Nurs Res Innov J 2010;16(1):40–53.

Pray WS. Nonprescription product therapeutics. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania State, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London, United Kingdom: Chapman & Hall; 1991.

World Health Organization. WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1979.

Kasa K, Vorakit P, Sinsan S, Namniang P. Translation and validation of the Thai version of the xerostomia assessment tool. SWU Dent J 2022;15(1):10–20.

Kohler PF, Winter ME. A quantitative test for xerostomia: The Saxon test, an oral equivalent of the Schirmer test. Arthritis Rheum 1985;28(10):1128-32.

Minagi H, Yamanaka Y, Sakai T. Evaluation of the Saxon test for patients with hyposalivation without Sjögren’s syndrome. J Oral Rehabil 2020;47(12):1550-6. doi:10.1111/joor.13093

Wolff A, Joshi RK, Ekström J, Aframian D, Pedersen AML, Proctor G, et al. A guide to medications inducing salivary gland dysfunction, xerostomia, and subjective sialorrhea: A systematic review sponsored by the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI. Drugs R D 2017;17(1):1–28.

Jensen SB, Vissink A, Limesand KH, Reyland ME. Salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in head and neck radiation patients. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2019;2019(53):lgz016. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgz016

Foglio‑Bonda A, Foglio‑Bonda P, Bottini M, Pezzotti F, Migliario M. Chemical-physical characteristics of artificial saliva substitutes: Rheological evaluation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2022;26(21):7833–9. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202211_30132

Farinone M, Foglio‑Bonda A, Foglio‑Bonda P, Pattarino F. Artificial saliva substitutes evaluation: The role of some chemical‑physical properties. Glob J Res Anal 2018;7(2):502–5.

Humphrey SP, Williamson RT. A review of saliva: Normal composition, flow, and function. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(2):162–9.

Wirotesangthong M. Microbiological limits in cosmetics. Isan J Pharm Sci 2021;17(1):1–12. doi:10.14456/ijps.2021.1

Motamed B, Alaee A, Azizi A, Jahandar H, Fard MJK, Jafari A. Comparison of the 1 and 2% pilocarpine mouthwash in a xerostomic population: A randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2022;22:548. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02576-6

Liang J, Liu QS, Ren Z, Min K, Yang X, Hao F, et al. Studying paraben-induced estrogen receptor- and steroid hormone–related endocrine disruption effects via multi-level approaches. Sci Total Environ 2023;869:161793. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161793

Boonroung T, Narongdej T, Vadcharavivad S. A comparative study of carboxymethylcellulose and enzyme-containing saliva substitute on quality of life in head and neck cancer patients with self-reported postradiation xerostomia. Thai Pharm Health Sci J 2011;6(1):17–24.

Vadcharavivad S, Boonroung T. Effects of two carboxymethylcellulose-containing saliva substitutes on post-radiation xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients related to quality of life. Asian Biomed 2013;7(2):193–202.

Lin C-Y, Ju S-S, Chia J-S, Chang C-H, Chang C-W, Chen M-H. Effects of radiotherapy on salivary gland function in patients with head and neck cancers. J Dent Sci 2015;10(3):253–62.

Hiraoka S, Yoshimura M, Nakajima A, Nakashima R, Mizowaki T. Long-term outcomes of stimulated salivary flow and xerostomia after definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with head and neck cancer. J Radiat Res 2024;65(1):71–7.

Kapourani A, Kontogiannopoulos KN, Manioudaki AE, Poulopoulos AK, Tsalikis L, Assimopoulou AN, et al. A review on xerostomia and its various management strategies: The role of advanced polymeric materials in the treatment approaches. Polymers (Basel) 2022;14(5):850. doi:10.3390/polym14050850

Epstein JB, Emerton S, Le N, Stevenson-Moore P. A double-blind crossover trial of oral balance gel and Biotene® toothpaste versus placebo in patients with xerostomia following radiation therapy. Oral Oncol 1999;35(2):132–7.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30