Medication Error Management Using Risk Register in a Sub-District Health Promotion Hospital, Nakhonratchasima Province

Main Article Content

Kanokwan Kanbanchong
Kritsanee Saramunee

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a system to reduce medication errors (MEs) in sub-district health promoting hospitals (SDHPH) by using the risk register. Methods: This study was an action research divided into 4 phases: 1) risk identification based on the incidence of MEs, 2) risk analysis based on the size and severity of the problem, 3) risk management by brainstorming to design risk reduction measures, and 4) monitoring and review of risks from MEs incidence data. After the implementation of risk register, the researcher collected data by a mixed method. Qualitative methods included observations, interviews and meeting arrangements, while quantitative methods included prescription reviews to analyze the incidence of MEs. Results: Problems that were selected for risk registration and root cause analysis were dispensing expired drug with grade D severity, dispensing the wrong strength and dispensing the wrong quantity of drugs, which were common incidences. Measure to prevent drug expiration included the creation of an expired drug monitoring system. Measures to prevent the wrong amount of drugs included changing dispensing to make it easier to check the amount, and revising the checking system. Measures to prevent errors on wrong strength were using stickers with different colors for drug with different strengths and changing the rechecking system.  After the introduction of the risk register, it was found that the incidence of dispensing the wrong potency decreased from 0.12% to 0.07%. The incidence of dispensing the wrong amount decreased from 0.24% to 0.21%, while the incidence of dispensing expired drugs decreased from 0.06% to 0. The staff at the SDHPH viewed risk register as a tool that provided an overview of the problem. However, the form should be revised to be concise and easy to record data. Conclusion: The development of a system to prevent MEs using a risk register is likely to help prevent MEs, but the form should be revised to make it more convenient to use.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

World Health Organization. Medication errors: Technical series on safer primary care [online]. 2016 [cited Mar 21, 2020]. Available from: apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252274/9789241511643-eng.pdf;jsessionid=A30EDF4FE5E 1595DF4CD5F0BDFA413B9?sequence=1.

Khaokom S, Sonthisombat P. A study of medication errors from prescribing by non-medical health providers for patients with chronic diseases following up at Sub-district Health Promoting Hospital, Laemngop District, Trat Province. Journal Of Phrapokklao Nursing College 2019; 30: 69-76.

Kunthong K, Fuangchan A. Development of medication service system to reduce medication error for patients with chronic diseases at Phakhai Primary Care Unit, Ayutthaya. Isan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2015; 11(Suppl): 82-8.

Phianthum C, Ploylearmsang C, Anusornsangiam W. Outcome of medication errors reduction procedure in Phukieo Health Promoting Hospitals, Chaiya phum Province. Isan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2018; 3: 116-29.

Lainer M, Mann E, Sonnichsen A. Information technology interventions to improve medication safety in primary care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2013; 25: 590-8.

Toivo T, Dimitrow M, Puustinen J, Savela E, Pelkonen K, Kiuru V, et al. Coordinating resources for prospective medication risk management of older home care clients in primary care: procedure development and RCT study design for demon- strating its effectiveness. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18: 74. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0737-z.

The Healthcare Accreditation Institute (Public Organization). Patient safety goals: SIMPLE Thailand 2018. Chonburi: Famous and Successful; 2018.

The Healthcare Accreditation Institute (Public Organization). Hospital and healthcare standards 4th edition. Bangkok: One D Books; 2018.

World Health Organization. Corporate risk register organization-wide strategic risk management in WHO [online]. 2013 [cited Oct 20, 2020]. Available from: apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB133/B13 3_10-en.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3OM8S0rTDX_ojAs45m bBg3zMY2OktkPw-rEmqlGL2-Q_-eqTKfXj-NXAQ.

Li W, Zhu LL, Zhou Q. Safe medication use based on knowledge of information about contraindica- tions concerning cross allergy and comprehensive clinical intervention. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2013; 9: 65–72.

Chen L. The risk management of medical device-related pressure ulcers based on the Australian/ New Zealand Standard. J Int Med Res 2018; 46: 4129–39.

James GM, Robert AC, John SC, David FD, Cathie F. Using a quantitative risk register to promote learning from a patient safety reporting system. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2015; 41: 76-87.

Nørgaard LS, Sørensen EW. Action research in pharmacy practice. In: Babar, ZUD, editor. Pharmacy practice research methods. Switzerland: Springer; 2015.

Tewthanom K, Thananonniwas S. Medication error and prevention guide for patient’s safety. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University (Humanities, Social Sciences and arts) 2009; 2: 195-217.

Rattanadetsakul C, Rattanadetsakul P. Risk register : drug risk management support tool [online]. 2018 [cited Mar 22, 2020]. Available from: ccpe.phar macycouncil.org/index.php?option=article_detail&subpage=article_detail&id=470.

Blondal AB, Sporrong SK, Almarsdottir AB. Intro ducing pharmaceutical pare to primary care in Iceland-an action research study. Pharmacy (Basel). 2017; 5: 23. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020 023.

Primary Health System Support Office. Guideline to development sub-district health promotion hospitals (5 stars SHPH) 2021 [online]. 2021 [cited Jun 26, 2022]. Available from: drive.google.com/file/d/1ToI gYSxVSZlqiCE7OoPHFNGM-qDg0iXZ/view.