Situation on Emergency Drug Management Systems in Primary Care Units, Chiangmai Province

Main Article Content

ธนภัทร พอจิตร
รัตนาภรณ์ อาวิพันธ์
พักตร์วิภา สุวรรณพรหม
กุลระวี วิวัฒนชีวิน

Abstract

Objective: To study the situation on inputs, processes and productivity of emergency drug management systems in Primary Care Units (PCU), Chiang Mai. Method: This study employed mixed methodology. Quantitatively, a questionnaire was used to collect data from two groups of subjects including   267 nurses/public health providers at all PCUs in Chiang Mai province (167 completed the survey) and 23 pharmacists from host hospitals (all replied). For qualitative part, group discussions were held with two groups of informants including 6 nurses/public health providers from PCUs and 8 pharmacists from host hospitals. Results: Regarding input factors, it was found that hypoglycemia was the condition for which emergency drugs were most often used in PCUs. Regarding personnel, 98.50% of PCUs were supported with full-time professional nurses. About 73.72% of full-time nurses working in PCUs had working experience in hospitals and 83.94% of nurses were trained in the programs and registered as required by the Nursing Council. In regard to process, 74.85% of PCU providers followed guidelines on treatment/the use of emergency drugs. In addition, about 43.47% of host hospitals provided fast track systems for replenishing stocks of PCUs emergency drugs. Regarding productivity, 75.46% of PCU’s providers made decisions on administering emergency drugs in the first instance, and then contacted the host hospitals to consult or deliver patients to them. Regarding safety, 82.93% of PCUs had no recording systems for medication errors on emergency drugs. The important suggestions from the subjects were to continue educating about emergency drugs and to support treatment guidelines/guidelines for emergency drugs use from the host hospital. Conclusion: Emergency drug management systems in PCU in Chiangmai should be further improved, in terms of inputs and process. This will result in a better productivity of the emergency drug management systems in PCUs in Chiang Mai.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

1. Mapanta S. Emergency drugs. In: Ningsanon T, editor. Drug information for public health personnel. 2nd ed. Bangkok: Hospital Pharmacy Association of Thailand; 2007. p. 203-27.

2. Institute for Safe Medication Practices. List of high-alert medications in acute care settings [online]. 2014 [cited Sep 30, 2016]. Available from: www.ismp .org/tools/highalertmedications.pdf

3. Saelao K. Overview of emergency medical operational standard, principle, criteria and protocols. Nonthaburi:National Institute of Emergency Medi- cine; 2014. p.1-2.

4.Institute of Hospital Quality Certification (Public Organization). Hospital and healthcare standard [online]. 2015 [cited Oct 25, 2016]. Available from: medinfo.psu.ac.th/nurse/NEW/QC/HA%20Standard_58_fn.pdf

5.National Health Security Office. Health service registration form for universal health care coverage system "Primary Care Unit": Guidelines for auditing for registration of primary care unit and health care units [online]. 2015 [cited Oct 25, 2016]. Available from: www.skko.moph.go.th/dward/document_file/d_kutbak/common_form_upload_file/20160713090544_40811988.pdf

6. Yamane T. Statistics: An introduction analysis. Tokyo: Haper International; 1973.

7. Kemppainen JK. Research critique.e In: Holzemer W, editor. Improving health through nursing research. Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. p. 114-117.

8. Srisuphan W, Chanthai K. Work manual of registered nurse for sub-district health promoting hospital. Nonthaburi: Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2013. p. 30-63.

9. Emergency Medical Act B.E. 2551. Royal Gazette No. 125, Part 44A (Mar 6, 2008).

10. Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council. Ministerial rule on professional conduct [online]. 2013 [cited Sep 16, 2018]. Available from: www.tnmc.or.th/ news /126

11. Veanseaw W, Chotklom P, editors. Standardization
and criteria for emergency medical systems Vol 1. Nonthaburi: National Institute of Emergency Medicine; 2010. p. 24-42.

12. Srithamrongsawat S, Aueasiriwon B, Bamrungkhet
W. Report on the review of international experiences on emergency medical services and lessons learned for Thailand [online]. 2013 [cited Sep 30, 2017]. Available from: kb.hsri.or.th/dspace/handle/11228/38 82?localeattribute=th

13. Ponsen K, Wachiradilok P, Sirisamutr T, Doungthip sirikul S, Kamnuan-lerk N. The situation and the factors affecting the use of emergency medical services at the emergency department of patient emergency in Thailand. [online]. 2016 [cited Apr 27, 2017]. Available from: www.niems.go.th/th/Upload/ File/255908171439332756_I7UNTXkvtBfQGYyL.pdf

14. Razzak JA, Kellermann AL. Emergency medical care in developing countries: is it worthwhile?. Bull World Health Organ. 2002; 80:e900–5.