Public Disclosure of Laboratory Tests According to Drugs, Food and Cosmetics Laws for Consumer Protection
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To study legal requirement and compare the process for public disclosure of laboratory tests according to the laws of drugs, food and cosmetics (DFC). Method: This research consisted of 3 parts: 1) documental research on related laws, criteria and procedures for public disclosure of test results of drugs, food and cosmetics (DFC), 2) survey of public disclosure of laboratory tests on DFC among 76 public health offices during 2012-2018 by using questionnaires and 3) In-depth interviews and focus group discussions in the Head of Consumer Protection and Public Health Pharmacy of 9 provincial public health offices that had disclosed laboratory tests on DFC to the public and officials at legal department of food and drug law in Food and Drug Administration, responsible for public disclosure of laboratory tests of health products to reach the conclusion on criteria, approaches and procedures in public disclosure of test results on DFC. Result: Public disclosure of laboratory test of DFC was not considered as an administrative order. The law DFC prescribes rules or conditions for consideration of public announcement of testing results and had different procedures among the Acts. According to the law, public announcement of the result from food analysis was authorized at the provincial level, while those for drugs and cosmetics had not been authorized to the province level. Survey of public announcement of the analysis result of DFC of 76 Public Health Offices revealed 58 never made such announcement (76.31%) The reasons for not doing so were no laboratory results needed to be announced (36.84 percent), followed by supervisor choosing not to make announcement (27.63%) and being not confident on the legitimacy of announcement (23.68%). All nineteen provinces having announced laboratory test in the past proposed the disclosure to both the governor and the Chief of Provincial Public Health for endorsement of the announcement on food testing. Conclusion: The Food and Drug Administration should review the authorization of the announcement of the result from laboratory testing of unsafe cosmetics in order to make such announcement flexible and in time. In addition, the warning system of the Department of Medical Sciences should be used to make public announcement on the results of the analysis of unsafe products in time.
Article Details
ผลการวิจัยและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความถือเป็นความคิดเห็นและอยู่ในความรับผิดชอบของผู้นิพนธ์ มิใช่ความเห็นหรือความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ หรือคณะเภสัชศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์ ทั้งนี้ไม่รวมความผิดพลาดอันเกิดจากการพิมพ์ บทความที่ได้รับการเผยแพร่โดยวารสารเภสัชกรรมไทยถือเป็นสิทธิ์ของวารสารฯ
References
Kasikorn Research Center. Keep an eye on health product trend and create business opportunities [online]. 2017 [cited Jun 27, 2018]. Available from: www.kasikornbank.com/th/business/sme/KSMEKnowledge/article/KSMEAnalysis/Pages/Heathy-Prod uct_Healthy-Trend.aspx.
Chalongsuk R. Concept of health consumer protec tion. Thai Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2017 ; 12: 77-89
Suteerawui P. Circumstances on the problems related to consumer protection in health products [online]. 2010 [cited Nov 27, 2018]. Available from: consumersouth.org/paper/1021.
Suksriwong C, Sermsinsiri V, Junto S, Kerdpeam W, Tanapal S. Literature review and consumer protec tion situation in the health system [online]. 2012 [cited Jun 27, 2018]. Available from: kb.hsri.or.th/ds pace/handle/11228/3659?locale-attribute=th.
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2560. Royal Gazette No.134, Part 40A (Apr 6, 2017).
Consumer Protection Act, B.E. 2522. Royal Gazette No.115, Part 15A (Mar 24,1998).
Administrative Procedure Act, B.E. 2539. Royal Gazette No.113, Part 60A (Nov 14, 1996).
Office of the Council of State. Administrative order [online]. 2017 [cited Jun 22, 2018]. Available from: web.krisdika.go.th/data/activity/act79.htm
Drug Act, B.E. 2510. Royal Gazette No. 84, Part101 special (Oct 20, 1967).
Food Act, B.E. 2522. Royal Gazette No. 96, Part79 special (May 13, 1979).
Cosmetic Act B.E. 2558. Royal Gazette No. 132, Part 86A (Sep 8, 2015).
Ministerial Regulations for Organizational Division of Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Public Health B.E.2552. Royal Gazette No.126, Part 98A page 106-15 (Dec 28, 2009).
Ministerial Regulations for Organizational Division of Department of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health B.E.2552. Royal Gazette No.126, Part 98A, page 70-9 (Dec 28, 2009).
European Commission. The rapid alert system for food and feed annual report [online]. 2015 [cited Jun 16, 2018]. Available from: ec.europa.eu /food /sites/food/files/safety/docs/rasff_annual_report_2015.pdf.
Nakhawatchana M. Analysis of competent officials’ roles under the laws on the responsibility of department of consumer protection and public health pharmacy, Udon Thani provincial public health office. Thai Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2016; 8: 237-48.
Uppatham J. Study of the legal matter on adminis- trative procedures for legal enforcement in health consumer protection. Research and Development Health System Journal 2019; 12: 49-64.