Impact of the Policy on Pracharath Drinking Water in Kanchanaburi Province

Main Article Content

เกษรา เวทยานนท์

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the rules governing the production of drinking water, the Implementation of the policy on Pracharath drinking water, and to prepare policy suggestion based on the impact of the policy. Method: This study was a qualitative study collecting the data by reviewing the laws governing the production of drinking water in sealed containers and automatic water dispensers, and related public and private documents published over the internet. The study then analyzed the stakeholders and interview those people affected by the Pracharath drinking water policy, including government officials outside the Ministry of Public Health, and public drinking water producers. Sunsequently, the researcher prepared policy suggestion for improving the quality of Pracharath drinking water. Results: Policy on Pracharath drinking water was the implementation of the program to strengthen the economic foundation according to private-public partnership approach. In Kanchanaburi, there were 245 Pracharath drinking water projects. Stakeholder analysis revealed Food and Drug Administration, Provincial Health Office and local administrative organization were responsible for overseeing the production of drinking water in sealed containers under the Food Act BE 2522. However, they were not in the working group on strengthening the economic foundation according to private-public partnership approach of the province. Therefore, it was not possible for them to provide information on relevant legal issues to the manufacturer. Interviews with those affected by the Pracharath drinking water policy revealed that governmental agencies not affliated with the Ministry of Public Health allocated budget in a hurry and not knowleagable on the rugulations relating to the production of drinking water in sealed containers. The producers did not know the law, so they did not ask for permission to produce and lacked budget preparation for maintenance. Conclusion: The effective implementation of the Pracharath drinking water policy needs cooperation from all parties with the following measures. The urgent measure is to propose the provincial governor to order the authority on the Pracharath drinking water to inform the manufacturer to file application for the production under the law in the same way as other manufacturers. Intermediate measure is the governor should issue the order to all relevant agencies to integrate the effort to resolve the problem. Long-term measure is the approval process of the project should involve authorities on the production of drinking water in providing information to the public on the rules and procedures for obtaining licenses before starting the production in the project.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

1. National Health Assembly. Meeting minutes of the 9th National Health Assembly, 2016: Agenda 2.2 a safe drinking water for public [online] 2016. [cited Mar 20, 2017]. Available from: https://www.samat cha.org/sites/default/files/141159%20Water%20draft%20Main_WP.pdf

2. National Village and Urban Community Fund Office. Manual for implementing program for strengthening foundation economy of according to the approach of civil state (for village and Urban community fund) [online] 2016. [cited Mar 20, 2017]. Available from: http://www.villagefund.or.th/index.aspx?pageid=469&parent=433&directory=2394&pagename=content

3. Working Committee on on Pracharath Program Implementation in Kanchanaburi. List of Pracharath drinking water project in Kanchanaburi in 2016. Kanchanaburi; Kanchanaburi Community Develop- ment Office; 2016.

4. Kanchanaburi Public Health Office. Result on the inspection of quality of drinking water in sealed containers (in laboratory) in 2016. Kanchanaburi; Kanchanaburi Public Health Office; 2016.

5. Kanchanaburi Public Health Office. Result on the inspection of quality of drinking water from automatic water dispensers in 2016. Kanchanaburi; Kanchanaburi Public Health Office; 2016.

6. Mookajornpan D. Risks ought to be informed in purchasing drinking water from automatic water dispensers part 2 [online] 2008. [cited June 20, 2017]. Available from: www.tpa.or.th/publisher/pdf FileDownloadS/p85-87.pdf.

7. Notification of Ministry of Public Health No. 362 in 2013 on drinking water from automatic water dispenser. Royal Gazette No. 130, Part 136D (Oct 16, 2013).

8. Notification of the Committee on Labeling No. 31 in 2010 on mandating automatic water dispensers as a labeling controlled product. Royal Gazette No. 127, Part 140 (Dec 8, 2010).

9. Notification of Ministry of Public Health in 2015 on activities detrimental to health. Royal Gazette No. 132, Part 165D (Jul 17, 2015).

10. Public Health Board. Recommendations of Public Health Board on the control of activities detrimental to health [online] 2016. [cited Mar 20, 2017]. Available from: laws.anamai.moph.go.th/download/ laws/update คำแนะนำ ประกาศกิจการ 2558.pdf.

11. Official letter from Local Government Department มท. 0891/1340 dated July 15, 20 on recommend- dations of the Public Health Board.

12. Official letter from Local Government Department มท. 0891.3/ว643 dated Mar 24, 2016 on survey of drinking water dispenser.

13. Sangklai L, Pooksun K, Jamsri P, trisanit K, Jittiyasara K. Risk assessment of drinking water dispenser in central region of Thailand and the support for setting the quality control standards. Journal of Department of Medical Sciences 2558; 57: 22-36.

14. Food Bureau. Food Act B.E.2522, ministerial regulations and notification of Ministry of Public Health (Revised edition in 2015). Nothaburi: Food and Drug Administration;
2015.

15. Meksawasdichai C, Ruengorn C. Quality of drinking water in sealed containers in saraburi province and recommendations for improvement. Thai Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2016: 8: 139-48.