Financial Impact Simulation of Changing Pharmaceutical Reimbursement Method for Outpatient Care among Major Health Insurance Schemes: Case of a General Hospital
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To simulate the financial impacts on the payers and providers if the developed pharmaceutical reimbursement schemes were implemented by comparing with those of the present reimbursement schemes for outpatients of Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS), Universal Coverage Scheme (UC) and Social Security Scheme. Methods: The study employed secondary data of outpatient prescribing in a general hospital during October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014. Subsequently, the simulation of financial impact was conducted using 3 alternatives for pharmaceutical reimbursement i.e., RP-1 (Comptroller General’s Department’s pricing scheme), RP-2 (pharmaceutical reimbursement pricing employing by the National Health Security Office of Bangkok area and RP-3 (pharmaceutical reimbursement pricing scheme developed by the Health Insurance System Research Office). Results: The RP-2 scheme saved drug cost for payers more than any other schemes while still able to cover the cost of medicine for health care provider. However, changing from capitation based payment for drug in for the UC scheme to item based fee would benefit in case of outpatients registered with the studied hospital with service utilization rate not higher than 66% and proportion for drug spending not less than 68%of capitation rate.Conclusion:All alternative pharmaceutical reimbursement methods in this study could save drug expenditure for CSMBS comparing to the current fee for charge based reimbursement scheme. Capitation based health insurance scheme or UC showed differential results depending on the payment ceiling level per utilization, proportion of beneficiary utilizing services, proportion of capitation rate available for medicine spending, and amount of drugs used by patients.
Article Details
ผลการวิจัยและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความถือเป็นความคิดเห็นและอยู่ในความรับผิดชอบของผู้นิพนธ์ มิใช่ความเห็นหรือความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ หรือคณะเภสัชศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์ ทั้งนี้ไม่รวมความผิดพลาดอันเกิดจากการพิมพ์ บทความที่ได้รับการเผยแพร่โดยวารสารเภสัชกรรมไทยถือเป็นสิทธิ์ของวารสารฯ
References
2. Nikomborirak D. Mechanism for taking care of health insurance systems to reduce disparities [online]. [cited Jan 16, 2016]. Available from: www.
Hfocus.org/database/2013/07/3943#sthash.Iz9c8pzp.dpuf.
3. Thaipublica. Looking into the budget of NHSO: spending capitated money inappropriately [online]. [cited Feb 11, 201]. Available from: thaipublica.org/ 2015/01/public-health-services-52/4.
4. Jindapol N, Kunupatham P, Theerasilp P, Kitikanna korn N. Crisis of health insurance under Thai Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS). Srina garind Medical Journal 2014;29:199-206.
5. Udomaksorn S, Kessomboon N, Ngorsuraches S, Sakulbumrungsil R, Kanchanaphibool I, Luangruan grong P, Sripanidkulchai K. Setting reimbursement prices for pharmaceuticals: Cases of outpatient referral, disability, accident, and emergency for Bangkok-region National Health Security Office. Journal of Health Systems Research 2014; 8: 307-19.
6. Health Insurance System Research Office. The proposed pharmaceutical reimbursement model being developed for those under the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Health System Research Institute; 2014.
7. Limwattananon C, Limwattananon S, Pannarunothai S, Tangcharoensathien V. Analysis of practice vari ation due to payment methods across health insurance schemes. CDP Health report.Nonthaburi, International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health; 2009.
8. Limwatananon S, Limwattananon C, Pannarunothai S. Cost and utilization of drugs prescribed for hospital-visited patients: impacts of universal health care coverage policy, Health Systems Research Institute; 2004.
9. Choonharas S. The situation of the Thai elderly 2008. Bangkok: Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development institute, Ministry of Social Development and Human Security; 2009.