Management of the Problem on Cosmetics with Prohibited Substances by Using Community Participation: A Case Study of Don-gloy Subdistrict, Phibunrak District in Udon Thani Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To develop a model for managing cosmetic problems containing prohibited substances by using community participation at Don-gloy subdistrict, Phibunrak district in Udon Thani province. Method: The researcher collected the problem of cosmetics containing prohibited substances in study area from the report on consumer protection of Don-gloy subdistrict health promoting hospital (SHPH) in the fiscal year 2016 and interview with responsible officers. There were 3 stages of problem management by the community: 1) preparation by organizing training and meeting among community members to brainstorm for the solutions of the problem. Participants in the training and meeting included community leaders, public health volunteers, representatives of groceries, and community representatives. Collectively determined measure to reduce the problem was the establishment of a center for warning, surveillance and compliant handling of the problem in the district with public health volunteers as the operator together with mentor or the officers in the SHPH. The researchers collected data from 60 participants before and after training on knowledge on purchasing cosmetics for acne, freckles, and face whitening. 2) activities of consumer protection in cosmetics involved the inspection of cosmetic selling stores, public education on knowledge on harm of substances prohibited in cosmetics, how to buy safe cosmetics and warning of harmful cosmetics in the community, and Informing legal penalties to entrepreneurs. 3) evaluation phase was conducted by assessing the potential of the warning center. Results: Community involvement in handling the problem included the identification of risks by raising community awareness on the problem, collective analysis of the problem, and selection of measures for risk reduction and risk communication, in order to cooperate with all sectors in monitoring progress and evaluation of problem handling. Knowledge related to acne, freckles and face whitening increased significantly after training. Assessment of the potential of the warning center revealed its strength at Level 4, implying being a community in the stage of development. Conclusion: The handling of the problem with participation of all sectors in the community through public education on knowledge about the harmful effects of substances prohibited in cosmetics, opening the forum for people in the community to understand the problem, finding the solution, choose an activity, and working cooperatively to handling the problem. Even though the evaluation of warning center reflected the community being in the stage of development, community representatives were happy and volunteered to work cooperatively
Article Details
ผลการวิจัยและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความถือเป็นความคิดเห็นและอยู่ในความรับผิดชอบของผู้นิพนธ์ มิใช่ความเห็นหรือความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ หรือคณะเภสัชศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์ ทั้งนี้ไม่รวมความผิดพลาดอันเกิดจากการพิมพ์ บทความที่ได้รับการเผยแพร่โดยวารสารเภสัชกรรมไทยถือเป็นสิทธิ์ของวารสารฯ
References
2. Public Health Ministerial Declaration in 2016 on the name of the substances prohibited as ingredients in cosmetics. Royal Gazette No. 133, Part 114D special (May 17, 2016).
3. Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University. Dangers of prohibited substances in cosmetics [online]. 2015 [cited Feb 3, 2017] Available from: med.mahidol.ac.th/ramapharmacy/th/knowledge/ general/04072016-2055-th
4. Cosmetic Act B.E. 2558 [online]. 2015 [cited Feb 27, 2017]. Available from: library2.parliament.go.th/giventa ke/content_nla2557/law86-080958-5.pdf
5. Rural and Local Consumer Health Products Promotion Division. Reporting system for the performance on health consumer protection in the regions [online]. 2016 [cited Feb 27, 2017]. Available from: kbs.fda.moph.go.th /kbs_webform_59/backend/control_page.php.
6. Food and Drug Administration. Situation of safety of food and health products at the marketplaces within health service area 7 and 8. Nonthaburi: Food and Drug Administration; 2016.
7. Thongchai U. Summary report on the activities of Dongloy Consumer Protection. Udonthani; 2016.
8. Saenpakdee P. Mind map & AIC for participatory planning [online]. 2016 [cited Feb 27, 2017]. Available from: www.prachasan.com/mindmapknowledge/aic.html
9. Division of Consumer Protection, Regional Medical Sciences Center 8 Udonthani, Department of Medial Sciences. Manual on plan for quality development of network of medical sciences in community for consumer protection in fiscal year of 2016; 2016.
10. Ungchusak K. Risk management: case study on “pickled bamboo” [unpublished lecture notes]. Expertise in risk management in consumer protection, The College of Pharmaceutical and Health Consumer Protection of Thailand; lecture given Oct 9, 2017.
11. Khoonhong K, Charoenpan C, Turnbull N. The development of community empowerment model in cosmetics consumer protection in the area of Samet Sub-District, Meung District, Buriram province. Thaksin University Journal 2015;18: 57-65.
12. Chuapun W. Summary of the Cosmetic Act B.E.2558. FDA Journal. 2015; 22: 81-4.
13. Ruenruay S. Development of consumer protection network on cosmetics in community: a case study of Tambon Ban Rai, Amphoe Ban Rai, Uthai Thani. [master thesis]. Nakornpratom: Silpakorn University; 2012.