The Use of Videolaryngoscopy for Managing Fish Bones and Other Foreign Bodies in the Throat within the Emergency Department

Managing Fish Bones and Other Foreign Bodies in the Throat

Authors

  • Teeravit Danrungrot Emergency Department, Phichit Hospital
  • Pornpatsorn Ruangwirojkul Emergency Department, Phichit Hospital

Keywords:

Videolaryngoscopy, fish bone, throat foreign body, Emergency Department

Abstract

Throat foreign bodies, mainly fish bones, are a common emergency department (ED) presentation in Thailand and conventionally require otolaryngology (ENT) consultation. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of videolaryngoscopy performed by emergency and general physicians for managing throat foreign bodies, compared with conventional management. This quasi-experimental study compared patients with suspected throat foreign body before (control, n = 27) and after (intervention, n = 22) implementing videolaryngoscopy (Insighters IS6, Macintosh blade size M or L) in the ED of Phichit Hospital. Primary outcomes were foreign body visualisation and successful removal. Visualizations and successful removal were significantly higher in the intervention group (72.7% vs 29.6%, p = 0.004; RD +43.1%, 95% CI 17.7 to 68.5; RR 2.45; OR 6.33; NNT 2.3). Median procedure time was 4.0 minutes with a median of 2 attempts. Topical anaesthesia (86.4% vs 11.1%), non-active bleeding (59.1% vs 21.1%) and antibiotic use (86.4% vs 40.7%) were more frequent in that group, whereas ENT referral was numerically lower (4.5% vs 18.5%). In conclusion, videolaryngoscopy improved foreign body detection and removal. Given the small sample, historical controls and increased minor mucosal bleeding, it should be regarded as an adjunct where ENT service is not immediately available, rather than routine ED practice

References

Kim HU. Oroesophageal fish bone foreign body. Clin Endosc 2016;49(4):318-26. doi:10.5946/ce.2016.087

Rankin A, Dhambagolla I, Johnston J, Vokes D. Our experience of fish bone foreign bodies in the upper aerodigestive tract: A retrospective cohort study of 1,293 patients. Aust J Otolaryngol 2025;8:20. doi:10.21037/ajo-24-60

Kim JP, Kwon OJ, Shim HS, Kim RB, Kim JH, Woo SH. Analysis of clinical feature and management of fish bone ingestion of upper gastrointestinal tract. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2015;8(3):261-7. doi:10.3342/ceo.2015.8.3.261

Koh WJ, Lum SG, Al-Yahya SN, Shanmuganathan J. Extraluminal migration of ingested fish bone in the upper aerodigestive tract: A series of three cases with broad clinical spectrum of manifestations and outcomes. Int J Surg Case Rep 2021;89:106606. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106606

Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez PH, Häfner M, Hartmann D, Hassan C, et al. Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016;48(5):489-96. doi:10.1055/s-0042-100456

He Z, Xu Q, Fan W, Shi J, Zhang G, Ye F. Non-foreign body-associated risk factors for complications associated with esophageal foreign-body removal and timing of endoscopic treatment: A single-center retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 2024;24(1):429. doi:10.1186/s12876-024-03532-0

Wang X, Su S, Chen Y, Wang Z, Li Y, Hou J, et al. The removal of foreign body ingestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract: A retrospective study of 1,182 adult cases. Ann Transl Med 2021;9(6):502. doi:10.21037/atm-21-829

Sin CK, Young B. Flexible endoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for localising impacted pharyngeal foreign bodies in emergency department: A randomised cross-over manikin pilot study. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2023;30(3):160-6. doi:10.1177/10249079211033373

Sakaida H, Chiyonobu K, Ishinaga H, Takeuchi K. Use of a rigid curved laryngoscope for removal of a fish bone in the hypopharynx. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2016;2016:9689521. doi:10.1155/2016/9689521

Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. Br J Anaesth 2022;129(4):612-23. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.027

Ho G, Singh N, Andrews J, Westhead P. Novel use of videolaryngoscopy to remove a foreign body. BMJ Case Rep 2015;2015:bcr2015210011. doi:10.1136/bcr-2015-210011

Kaufmann J, Grozeva B, Laschat M, Brackhahn M, Rudolph D, Neuhaus N, et al. Rapid and safe removal of foreign bodies in the upper esophagus in children using an optimized Miller size 3 video laryngoscope blade. Paediatr Anaesth 2021;31(5):587-93. doi:10.1111/pan.14158

Lee FP. Removal of fish bones in the oropharynx and hypopharynx under video laryngeal telescopic guidance. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;131(1):50-3. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.02.017

Shishido T, Suzuki J, Ikeda R, Kobayashi Y, Katori Y. Characteristics of fish-bone foreign bodies in the upper aero-digestive tract: The importance of identifying the species of fish. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0255947. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255947

Pankhania R, Geyton T, Walker D. Removal of fishbone under local anaesthetic using flexible nasal endoscopy: A novel technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2022;104(3):231-5. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2021.0165

Alexandre PL, Pinto JV, Costa L, Marques P, Moura CP. Rigid esophagoscopy for foreign body extraction: Results and complications in the endoscopic era. Cureus 2024;16(1):e53040. doi:10.7759/cureus.53040

Tao X, Zhao X, Liu H, Wang J, Tian C, Liu L, et al. Automatic recognition of concealed fish bones under laryngoscopy: A practical AI model based on YOLO-V5. Laryngoscope 2024;134(5):2162-9. doi:10.1002/lary.31175

Downloads

Published

2026-09-17