Contrast sensitivity with Aspheric IOL in patients with posterior ocular disease and non-ocular disease
Contrast Sensitivity Using Aspheric IOL
Keywords:
Contrast sensitivity, posterior ocular disease, intraocular lensAbstract
Aspheric intraocular lenses (IOL) help to enhance vision quality by reducing light scattering and improving contrast sensitivity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate contrast sensitivity data in patients with aspheric IOL between those who had posterior ocular disease and patients who did not have the ocular disease. From 2015 to 2019, data was obtained from the Rangsit University eye clinic. There are 16 cases of posterior ocular disease and 20 cases without ocular disease. In respect of the contrast sensitivity data gathered with the OPTEC 6500 vision tester under various lighting conditions. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for analysis. According to the study results. Patients with posterior ocular disease had significantly lower contrast sensitivity than patients without ocular disease in photopic with glare condition at a spatial frequency of 12 cycles/degree (p= 0.034). While age and visual acuity were not significantly different. In conclusion, aspheric IOL may contribute to contrast sensitivity between posterior ocular disease and non-ocular disease was not significantly different. Despite this, Contrast sensitivity is also affected by posterior eye disease. By mean was considered lower than those without ocular disease.
References
Sun Y, Erdem E, Lyu A, Zangalli C, Wizov SS, Lo D, et al. The SPARCS: A novel assessment of contrast sensitivity and its reliability in patients with corrected refractive error. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100(10):1421-6.
Bambo MP, Ferrandez B, Güerri N, Fuertes I, Cameo B, Polo V, et al. Evaluation of contrast sensitivity, chromatic vision, and reding ability in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:7074016. https://doi:10.1155/2016/7074016
Rao A, Pal A, Mohapatra S. Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity in staging glaucoma. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2020;9(13):39. https://doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.13.39
Owsley C, Huisingh C, Clark ME, Jackson GR, McGwin GJr. Comparison of visual function in older eyes in the earliest stages of age-related macular degeneration to those in normal macular health. Curr Eye Res 2016;41(2):266-72.
Pondorfer SG, Wintergerst MWM, Gorgi Zadeh S, Schultz T, Heinemann M, Holz FG, et al. Association of visual function measures with Drusen volume in early stages of age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020;61(3):55. https://doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.3.55
Kim B, Kwon S, Choi A, Jeon S. Influence of mild non-foveal involving epiretinal membrane on visual quality in eyes with multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021;259(9):2723-30.
Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Montés-Micó R, Rodríguez-Galietero A, Alió JL. Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(8):1320-7.
Montard R, Putz C, Creisson G, Montard M. Aberrometry and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery: Aspheric IOL evaluation. J Fr Ophtalmol 2008;31(3):257-62.
Deshpande R, Satijia A, Dole K, Mangiraj V, Deshpande M. Effects on ocular aberration and contrast sensitivity after implantation of spherical and aspherical monofocal intraocular lens-A comparative study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2022;70(8):2862-5.
Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade FC, Boteon JE. Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: A comparative study. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145(5):827-33.
Liu L, Wang Y, Liu J, Liu W. Retinal-image quality and contrast sensitivity function in eyes with epiretinal membrane: A cross-sectional observational clinical study. BMC Ophthalmol 2018;18(1):290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0957-1
Schwartz SH. Visual perception a clinical orientation. 4thed. New York City, New York State, USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2010. p.179-80.
Li Z, Hu Y, Yu H, Li J, Yang X. Effect of age and refractive error on quick contrast sensitivity function in Chinese adults: A pilot study. Eye 2021;35(3):966-72.
Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Jafarzadehpur E, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Fotouhi A. Contrast sensitivity evaluation in a population-based study in Shahroud, Iran. Ophthalmology 2012;119(3):541-6.
Tang Y, Zhou Y. Age-related decline of contrast sensitivity for second-order stimuli: Earlier onset, but slower progression, than for first- order stimuli. J Vis 2009;9(7):18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/9.7.18
McAnany JJ, Park JC, Liu K, Liu M, Chen YF, Chau FY, et al. Contrast sensitivity is associated with outer-retina thickness in early-stage diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 2020;98(2):e224-e231. https://doi: 10.1111/aos.14241
Pramanik S, Chowdhury S, Ganguly U, Banerjee A, Bhattacharya B, Mondal LK. Visual contrast sensitivity could be an early marker of diabetic retinopathy. Heliyon 2020;6(10):e05336. https://doi: 10.1016/heliyon.2020.e05336
Jackson GR, Scott IU, Quillen DA, Walter LE, Gardner TW. Inner retinal visual dysfunction is a sensitive marker of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96(5):699-703.
Thakur S, Ichhpujani P, Kumar S, Kaur R, Sood S. Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma. Eye 2018;32(8):1392-400.
Ridder WH, Comer G, Oquindo C, Yoshinaga P, Engles M, Burke J. Contrast sensitivity in early to intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Curr Eye Res 2022;47(2):287-96.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Buddhchinaraj Phisanulok Hospital
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
