Recurrence of AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia (AVNRT) after Low Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Recurrence of AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Authors

  • Sineenart Ouikatcha Cardiac Center, Naresuan University Hospital, Phitsanulok

Keywords:

cardiac arrhythmia, AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, catheter ablation

Abstract

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF ablation) is considered as the gold standard for treatment of patients  with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and catheter ablation with a power setting between 20 to 60 watts have been reported. The objective of this retrospective descriptive study aimed to evaluate recurrence rate in patient with AVNRT who underwent RF ablation with low power technique in Naresuan University Hospital between January 2014 to December 2017. The results showed that, out of 160  patients who underwent RF ablation with power setting 30 to 35 watts, there were 131 women (81.9%), the  average age was 53.7years, AV block occurred during ablation was 18.8%. All of patients were not inducible  AVNRT after ablationin 30 minutes. During a follow up of three and six months, the recurrence rate of AVNRT  was 0.6%, permanent AV block occurred in three patients (1.9%) and regular permanent pacemaker implantation was required in one patient (0.6%). In conclusion, the radiofrequency catheter ablation with low  power is a safe and effective method to manage patients with AVNRT. 

References

1. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, Kronick SL, Shuster M, Callway CW, et al. Adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation
2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S729-67.

2. Medi C, Kalman JM, Freedman SB, Supraventricular tachycardia. MJA 2009;190(5):255-60.

3. Wongcharoen W, Phrommintikul A, editors. 210 question & answer in cardiovascular disease. Chiangmai, Thailand: Trickthink; 2020.

4. Aroonsiriwattana S. Treatment of radiofrequency ablation of cardiac arrhythmia in Suratthani Hospital. Region 11 Med J 2015;29(1):137-43.

5. Dechering DG, Schleberger R, Greiser E, Dickow J, Koebe J, Frommeyer G, et al. Outcome of slow pathway modulation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with 50 versus 30 watts more power, more effect. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2018;52(2):157-61.

6. Harkness A, Ring L, Augustine D, Oxborough D, Robinson S, Sharma V, et al. Normal reference intervals for cardiac dimensions and function for use in echocardiographic practice: a guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res
Prac 2020;7(1):G1-18.

7. Musa T, Darrat Y, Etaee F, Butt M, Czarapata M, Mcmullen C, et al. Gender differences in management of patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2019;42(7):937-41.

8. Knight B, Ebinger M, Oral H, Kim M, Sticherling C, Pelosi F, et al. Diagnostic value of tachycardia features and pacing maneuvers during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(2):574-82.

9. Wu J, Deisenhofer I, Ammar S, Fichtner S, Reents T, Zhu P, et al. Acute and long term outcome after catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients after the Mustard or Senning operation for d-TGA. EP Europace 2013;15(6):886-91.

10. Feldman A, Voskoboinik A, Kumar S, Spence S, Morton BJ, Kistler PM, et al. Predictors of acute and long term success of slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. PACE 2011;34(8):927-33.

11. Shailesh F, Sewani A, Paydak H. Recurrent AV block following ablation for AVNRT. Indian Heart J 2014;66(6):710-3

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30