Development of a NAT2 Testing-integrated Pharmaceutical Care System and Changes in Anti-tuberculosis Drug-induced Hepatitis in a Community Hospital
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To develop a N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) testing integrated pharmaceutical care system for newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients in a community hospital, and to evaluate changes in anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatitis after system implementation. Methods: This quasi-experiment was a system-development study. The subjects comprised new pulmonary tuberculosis patients aged 18 years or older who initiated treatment between October 1, 2023 and December 31, 2025 and received the standard 2HRZE/4HR regimen. Patients with HIV infection, pre-existing liver disease or a known history of hepatitis, a baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level greater than twice the upper limit of normal value before treatment initiation, and patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis were excluded. The development of a pharmaceutical care system with NAT2 genotyping was based on the concept of pharmaceutical care, Donabedian’s structure–process–outcome framework, and two cycles of the Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) framework. The pre-implementation period was from October 1, 2023 to September 30, 2024. The transitional period was from October to December 2024, and the post-implementation period was from January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025. Data from the transitional period were excluded from the primary analysis. The primary outcome was the monthly incidence of antituberculosis drug-induced hepatitis. The study used a monthly interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis. The main model was segmented Poisson regression, with the monthly number of new pulmonary tuberculosis patients as an offset variable. Results: After full implementation, all patients received NAT2 testing, and the results were used to support individualized isoniazid dose adjustment. All rapid and slow acetylators received dose adjustment, while intermediate acetylators received the standard dose according to the Thai national tuberculosis guideline. Medication adherence assessed by pill count increased from 96.7 ± 1.4% to 97.8 ± 0.9% (P<0.001). Anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatitis decreased from 60 of 152 patients (39.5%) to 13 of 165 patients (7.9%). ITS analysis showed a significant immediate reduction in the incidence level after full implementation (incidence rate ratio or IRR 0.503, 95% CI 0.345–0.732, P<0.001), as well as a significant reduction in the post-implementation monthly trend compared with that of the pre-implementation period (IRR 0.837, 95% CI 0.747–0.938, P=0.002). Conclusion: After implementing a pharmaceutical care system with NAT2 testing, the incidence of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatitis showed a decreasing trend, accompanied by improvements in NAT2 testing, dose adjustment, safety monitoring, and medication adherence. These findings should be interpreted as changes associated with an integrated service system rather than the independent effect of NAT2 testing or isoniazid dose adjustment alone. The study cannot conclude its microbiological effectiveness or long-term treatment outcomes.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ผลการวิจัยและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความถือเป็นความคิดเห็นและอยู่ในความรับผิดชอบของผู้นิพนธ์ มิใช่ความเห็นหรือความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ หรือคณะเภสัชศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์ ทั้งนี้ไม่รวมความผิดพลาดอันเกิดจากการพิมพ์ บทความที่ได้รับการเผยแพร่โดยวารสารเภสัชกรรมไทยถือเป็นสิทธิ์ของวารสารฯ
References
World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury. J Hepatol 2019; 70: 1222-61.
Richardson M, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Sloan DJ, Davies G, Jorgensen AL. NAT2 variants and toxicity related to anti-tuberculosis agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2019; 23: 293-305.
Mahajan R, Tyagi AK. Pharmacogenomic insights into tuberculosis treatment shows the NAT2 genetic variants linked to hepatotoxicity risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Genom Data 2024; 25: 103.
Surarak T, Chumnumwat S, Nosoongnoen W, Tragulpiankit P. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of isoniazid affected by NAT2 polymorphisms in patients with tuberculosis: A systematic review. Clin Transl Sci 2024; 17: e13795.
Azuma J, Ohno M, Kubota R, Yokota S, Nagai T, Tsuyuguchi K, et al. NAT2 genotype guided regimen reduces isoniazid-induced liver injury and early treatment failure in the 6-month four-drug standard treatment of tuberculosis: a randomized controlled trial for pharmacogenetics-based therapy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 69: 1091-101.
Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990; 47: 533-43.
ASHP Council on Professional Affairs. Draft statement on pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1993; 50: 126-8.
Iskandar D, Suryanegara FDA, van Boven JFM, Postma MJ. Clinical pharmacy services for tuberculosis management: a systematic review. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14: 1186905.
Pradipta IS, Yanuar EO, Nurhijriah CY, Maharani NP, Subra L, Destiani DP, et al. Practical models of pharmaceutical care for improving tuberculosis patient detection and treatment outcomes: A systematic scoping review. Trop Med Infect Dis 2023; 8: 287.
Awad K, Jaam M, Awaisu A, Stewart D, Rathore HA, Abdul Hadi M. Impact of pharmaceutical care interventions in improving clinical outcomes among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review. J Pharm Policy Pract 2024; 17: 2305770.
Clark PM, Karagoz T, Apikoglu-Rabus S, Izzettin FV. Effect of pharmacist-led patient education on adherence to tuberculosis treatment. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007; 64: 497-505.
Cernasev A, Stillo J, Black J, Batchu M, Bell E, Tschampl CA. Pharmacists’ role in global TB elimination: practices, pitfalls, and potential. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12: 1137.
Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988; 260: 1743-8.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q 2005; 83: 691-729.
Pal D, Patnaik A, Mishra A, Singh AK, Parida SP, Mourougan M. Effectiveness of Plan-Do-Check-Act approach in improving the safe injection practice among healthcare workers in a secondary-level healthcare facility: a pre- and post-study design. J Educ Health Promot 2025; 14: 171.
Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 348-55.
Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. National tuberculosis control programme guidelines, Thailand, 2021. Bangkok: Department of Disease Control; 2021.
McDonagh EM, Boukouvala S, Aklillu E, Hein DW, Altman RB, Klein TE. PharmGKB summary: Very important pharmacogene information for N-acetyltransferase 2. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2014; 24: 409-25.
Wichukchinda N, Pakdee J, Kunhapan P, Imunchot W, Toyo-Oka L, Tokunaga K, Mahasirimongkol S. Haplotype-specific PCR for NAT2 diplotyping. Hum Genome Var 2020; 7: 13.
Aithal GP, Watkins PB, Andrade RJ, Larrey D, Molokhia M, Takikawa H, Hunt CM, Wilke RA, Avigan M, Kaplowitz N, Bjornsson E, Daly AK. Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 201; 89: 806-15.
Subbaraman R, de Mondesert L, Musiimenta A, Pai M, Mayer KH, Thomas BE, et al. Measuring tuberculosis medication adherence: a comparison of multiple approaches in relation to urine isoniazid metabolite testing within a cohort study in India. PLoS Med 2021; 18: e1003758.
Hongprasit P, Sonthisombat P. Assessment of TB treatment adherence using computer-assisted self-interviewing. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2023; 27: 626-31.
World Health Organization. Definitions and reporting framework for tuberculosis – 2013 revision. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.