Comparison of Accuracy and Precision of Volumes in Drugs Prepared by the Chemotherapy Compounding Robot and the Pharmacists at Udonthani Cancer Hospital

Main Article Content

Thitikan Siripakornkan
Araya Lukanawonakul

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy and precision of the volume of drugs prepared by the chemotherapy compounding robot or AYA and manual preparation by pharmacists at Udonthani Cancer Hospital. Method: This prospective experimental study collected data from having the AYA chemotherapy compounding robot and 4 pharmacists draw various volumes of distilled water with 5 sizes of syringes for 5 times in each volume. The study determined the difference in weight of syringes before and after drawing distilled water, and calculated the volume of water prepared. The study analyzed the accuracy from the standard deviation. Results: AYA robot is the first injectable chemotherapy mixing robot produced in Thailand. The robot drew distilled water with an accuracy of more than 90% (in the range of 95.56-99.32%) in all sizes of syringes used and in all measuring volumes. The pharmacists drew the volume of water with the accuracy more than 90% (in the range of 93.50-99.71%) in every size of syringe used and in every volume measured, except for measuring 1 mL of water with 5 and 10 mL syringes with accurate at only 79.30 and 80.80%, respectively. The measurement of 1 ml of water with 5 and 10 ml syringes by the robot obtained the volume with 20.02 and 14.76% more accurate than that measured by the pharmacist, respectively (P<0.001). The robot also drew water with a volume that was 3.15-4.96% more accurate than that measured by the pharmacist when using 5 ml syringes (to draw 2.5 and 5 ml of water) and 50 ml syringes (to draw 10 and 50 ml of water). In other cases, the difference in volumes of water drew by the robot and the pharmacists were not more than 2%. Conclusion: The chemotherapy mixing robot can draw drugs with more accurate and precise volumes than the pharmacist in some cases.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Strategy and Planning Division, Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health. Public health statistics A.D.2022 [online]. 2022 [cited Oct 27, 2024]. Available from: spd.moph.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Hstatistic65.pdf

Connor TH, DeBord G, Pretty JR, Oliver MS, Roth TS, Lees PSJ, et al. Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers. J Occup Environ Med. 2010; 52: 1019-27.

Yaniv AW, Orsborn A, Bonkowski JJ, Chew L, Kramer I, Calabrese S, et al. Robotic IV medication compounding: recommendations from the international community of APOTECAchemo users. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2017; 74: e40-0.

United States Pharmacopeia. Commentary on chapter <795>: Pharmaceutical compounding – Nonsterile preparations. USP–NF 2023 Issue 1 [online]. 2022 [cited Oct 27, 2024]. Available from: www.uspnf.com/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/usp-nf-commentary/795-commentary-20221101.pdf

NCSS. Pilot study sample size rules of thumb [online]. 2024 [cited Oct 27, 2024]. Available from: www.ncss. com/wp-content/themes/ncss/pdf/Procedures/PASS/ Pilot_Study_Sample_Size_Rules_of_Thumb.pdf

Lukanawonakul A, Siripakornkarn T, Tungkasamit T. Effectiveness of chemotherapy preparation robots in terms of accuracy, precision, and working time for injectable anticancer drugs in patients at Udon Thani Cancer Hospital. Journal of the Department of Medical Services 2023; 48: 47-54.

Fierro Jr P, Nyer EK. The water encyclopedia: Hydrologic data and internet resources [online]. 2007 [cited Oct 27, 2024]. Available from: doi.org/10.1201/ 9781420012583

Horwitz W, Albert R. Precision in analytical measurements: Expected values and consequences in geochemical analyses. Fresenius J Anal Chem 1995; 351: 507–13.

Geersing TH, Klous MG, Franssen EJF, van den Heuvel JJG, Crul M. Robotic compounding versus manual compounding of chemotherapy: Comparing dosing accuracy and precision. Eur J Pharm Sci 2020; 155: 105536.

Poppe LB, Savage SW, Eckel SF. Assessment of final product dosing accuracy when using volumetric technique in the preparation of chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2016; 22: 3-9.

Bhakta SB, Colavecchia AC, Coffey W, Curlee DR GK. Implementation and evaluation of a sterile compounding robot in a satellite oncology pharmacy. Am J Heal Pharm 2018; 75: S51–7.

Seger AC BC, Churchill WW, Keohane CA, Belisle CD, Wong ST, Sylvester KW, et al. Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs. J Oncol Pract 2012; 8: 344-9.

White R, Cassano-Piché A, Fields A, Cheng R, Easty A. Intravenous chemotherapy preparation errors: Patient safety risks identified in a pan-Canadian exploratory study. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2014; 20: 40–6.