Validation of the Medication Adherence Scale in Thais in Schizophrenic Patients
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To test the Medication Adherence Scale for Thais (MAST) in schizophrenic patients and to determine cut-off point for an adequate medication adherence (MA). Methods: Participants were 119 outpatients with schizophrenia in Suansaranrom Hospital with ≥ 6 months of antipsychotic treatment. Data were collected at Month 0 by interviewing the participants using the MAST, the MA scale for schizophrenic patients of Sathuporn Putkhao, the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS), and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). The study also assessed MA at Month 0 by pill count. At the third month, the researchers assessed subjects using the BPRS, pill count, and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MCSDS) for measuring one’s tendency to conform others’ expectations. At the sixth month, researchers assessed the patients with the MAST, the BPRS, pill counts, and the SQLS. The ROC (receiver operator characteristics) curves was employed to assess measurement properties of the MAST. Results: Exploratory factor analysis of the MAST scores at Months 0 and 6 revealed the scale contained one dimension. Cronbach's Alphas of the MAST at Months 0 and 6 were 0.84 and 0.85, respectively. The correlation coefficient (r) of the MAST scores at Months 0 and 6 was 0.88 (P<0.001). The r between the MAST score at Month 0 and MA measured by pill count at Months 0, 3, and 6 were 0.75, 0.72, and 0.73, respectively (P<0.001). The r between the MAST score at Month 0 and MA score from Sathuporn Putkhao’s scale (measured at Month 0) was 0.64 (P<0.001). Construct validity was evident from r between the MAST score at Month 0 and the quality life as measured by the SQLS at months 0 and 6 (-0.27 to -0.43; high SQLS scores represented poor quality of life) (P<0.003). The r between MAST scores at Month 0 and the BPRS at Month 0 , 3 and 6 ranged from -0.19 to -0.45 (high BPRS scores reflects more psychiatric symptoms) (P<0.037). The MAST scores at Months 0 and 6 and MCSDS were correlated with r of 0.28 and 0.30, respectively (P<0.002), indicating that patients with high social desirability reported a higher score on the MAST. Using MA from the pill count at Months 0 and 6 as gold standard, area under the ROC curve was 0.85 and 0.88, respectively. Appropriate cut-off point was 36 (out of the full score of 40). The MAST scale had sensitivity and specificity at 73.91-80.00 and 72.92-77.88%, respectively. Ooverall predictive accuracy was 73-78%. Positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 34.29-39.53%, and 92.11-96.43, respectively. Positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were in the range of 2.73-3.62 and 0.26-0.36, respectively. Conclusion: In schizophrenic patients, the MAST scale shows good validity, reliability, sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the measure could be used to assess MA in patients with this disease.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ผลการวิจัยและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความถือเป็นความคิดเห็นและอยู่ในความรับผิดชอบของผู้นิพนธ์ มิใช่ความเห็นหรือความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ หรือคณะเภสัชศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์ ทั้งนี้ไม่รวมความผิดพลาดอันเกิดจากการพิมพ์ บทความที่ได้รับการเผยแพร่โดยวารสารเภสัชกรรมไทยถือเป็นสิทธิ์ของวารสารฯ
References
Institute of health Metrics and Evaluation. Global health data exchange [online]. 2019 [cited Sep 18, 2020]. Available from: ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-resul ts-tool?params=gbd-api-2019-permalink/27a7644e8ad28e739382d31 e77589dd7
World Health Organization. Schizophrenia [online]. 2022 [cited Mar 20, 2022]. Available from: www.who. int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/schizophrenia.
ThaiPBS. Director General of the Department of Mental Health revealed schizophrenia could be cured--There are more than 400,000 Thai patients [online]. 2016 [cited Mar 20, 2022]. Available from: news.thaipbs.or.th/content/ 252292.
Laursen TM, Nordentoft M, Mortensen PB. Excess early mortality in schizophrenia. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2014; 10, 425-38.
Wiwekwan Y. Mental health and caring behaviors of caregivers of schizophrenic patients [master thesis]. Bangkok; Mahidol University; 2000.
Almond S, Knapp M, Francois C, Toumi M, Brugha T. Relapse in schizophrenia: costs, clinical outcomes and quality of life. Br J Psychiatry. 2004; 184: 346-51.
Stithyudhakarn S. Relapse in persons with chronic schizophrenia: Situation and prevention. Journal of Nursing Science Chulalongkorn University 2016; 28: 1-15
Staring A, Van M, Mulder L. Schizophrenia and antipsychotic medication–better adherence, better outcomes? Schizophr Res 2013; 151: 296-7.
Gaebal W, Riesbeck M, Wilmsdoff M, Burn T, Derk E, Kahn R, Rossler W, Fleischhacker W. Drug attitude as predictor for effectiveness in first-episode schizophrenia: Results of an open randomized trial (EUFEST). J Euroneuro 2010; 20: 310-6.
Maneesakorn S, Robson D, Gournay K, Gray R. An RCT of adherence therapy for people with schizophrenia in Chiang Mai, Thailand. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16: 1302-12.
Farmer KC. Methods for measuring and monitoring medication regimen adherence in clinical trials and clinical practice. Clin Ther 1999; 21: 1074-90.
Byerly M, Thompson A, Carmody T, Bugno R, Erwin T, Kashner M, Rush AJ. Validity of electronically monitored medication adherence and conventional adherence measures in schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2007; 58: 844-7.
Velligan D, Lam Y, Glahn D, Barrett J, Maples N, Ereshefsky L, Miller A. Defining and assessing adherence to oral antipsychotics: a review of the literature. Schizophr Bull 2006; 32: 724-42.
Svarstad BL, Chewning BA, Sleath BL, Claesson C. The Brief Medication Questionnaire: a tool for screening patient adherence and barriers to adherence. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 37:113-24.
Risser J, Jacobson TA, Kripalani S. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS) in low-literacy patients with chronic disease. J Nurs Meas. 2007; 15: 203-19.
Kim MT, Hill MN, Bone LR, Levine DM. Deve lopment and testing of the Hill-Bone Compli-ance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale.Prog Cardio vasc Nurs. 2000; 15: 90-6.
Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, Ward HJ. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J Clin Hypertens 2008; 10: 348-54.
Morisky Medication Adherence Research. MMAS license pricing [online]. 2020 [cited Mar 20, 2022]. Available from: www.moriskyscale.com/mmas-licens e-pricing.html#/
Sakthong P, Chabunthom R, Charoenvisuthiwongs R. Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother 2009; 43: 950-7.
Jongwilaikasem K, Lerkiatbundit S. Development of the Medication Adherence Scale for Thais (MAST). Thai Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2021; 13: 17-30.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.) [online]. 2013 [cited Sep 18, 2020]. Available from: doi-org.ezproxy.frederick.edu/10.1176/appi.books.9 780890425596.
Putkhao S. Factor affecting medication compliance in schizophrenic patients [master thesis]. Chiang Mai; Chiang Mai University; 1998.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175–91.
Wilkinson G, Hesdon B, Wild D, Cookson R, Farina C, Sharma V, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C. Self-report quality of life measure for people with schizophrenia: the SQLS. Br J Psychiatry. 2000; 177: 42-6. doi: 10. 1192/bjp.177.1.42.
Chuchuay N. Effects of buddy programs on medica tion adherence in patients with schizophrenia [minor thesis]. Songkhla: Prince of Songkla University; 2010
Department of Mental Health. Manual for the provi- sion of care for psychiatric with high risk to violence within the institution affiliated with Department of Mental Health. Bangkok: Prosperous Plus; 2020.
Crowne DP, Marlowe D. A new scale of social desira bility independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psy chol 1969; 24: 349-54.
Chaowalit A. Development and psychometric evalu- ation of the Ethical Issues Scale (EIS) for HIV/AIDs patient care in Thailand [dissertation]. Massachu settts: Boston College School of Nursing; 1997.
Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. Introduction to psycho metric theory. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2011.
Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, Gibson ES, Bernholz CD, Mukherjee J. Can simple clinical measurements detect patient noncompliance? Hyper tension 1980; 2: 757–64.
Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF. The inconsistency of “optimal” cut-points using two ROC based criteria Am J Epidemiol 2006; 163: 670–5.
Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240: 1285-93.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
Suphachamroon A, Lerkiatbundit S, Saengcharoen W. Validity and reliability of medication adherence scale in Thais (MAST): testing in diabetes patients. Thai Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2018; 10: 607-19.
Baumgartner PC, Haynes RB, Hersberger KE, Arnet I. A systematic review of medication adherence thres holds dependent of clinical outcomes. Front Pharma col 2018; 9: 1290.doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.0 1290.
Sakthong P, Sonsa-Ardjit N, Sukarnjanaset P, Mun pan W, Suksanga P. Development and psychome tric testing of the medication taking behavior tool in Thai patients. Int J Clin Pharm 2016; 38: 438-45.