Accuracy of Renal Stone Classification by Dual-Energy Computed Tomography
Keywords:
Kidney stone, Dual-energy computed tomography, Stone composition, Diagnostic accuracy, UrolithiasisAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in classifying renal stone composition compared with radiologist interpretation as the reference standard, and to identify factors associated with diagnostic accuracy. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who underwent non-contrast CT of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT KUB) using a low-dose DECT kidney stone protocol at Rajavithi Hospital between October 1, 2021, and September 30, 2024. A total of 75 patients with 171 renal stones were analyzed. Stone characteristics, including attenuation values (Hounsfield units), volume, maximum diameter, and dual-energy index (DEI), were measured. Stone classification obtained from DECT was compared with radiologist interpretation using the Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. The CT system underwent routine quality control according to manufacturer and radiology standards, including assessment with a CT quality control phantom to verify CT number accuracy, image uniformity, contrast resolution, and slice thickness. Standardized acquisition and post-processing protocols were applied throughout the study to minimize measurement variability.
The results revealed that DECT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for renal stone classification, particularly in differentiating uric acid stones from calcium-containing stones. The diagnostic performance showed an accuracy of 97.13%, sensitivity of 98.43%, specificity of 93.18%, positive predictive value of 97.66%, and negative predictive value of 95.35%. DECT-based classification was in significant agreement with radiologist interpretation (p < 0.001).
DECT is a reliable and effective imaging modality for renal stone characterization and can support clinical decision-making and treatment planning in patients with nephrolithiasis.
Downloads
References
Rule AD, Krambeck AE, Lieske JC. Kidney stones: a global health problem. Lancet. 2018;392(10166):2345-56.
Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):160-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052
ชาญชัย บุญหล้า, ปิยะรัตน์ โตสุโขวงศ์, และเกรียง ตั้งสง่า. (2550). โรคนิ่วไต: จากกลไกการเกิดนิ่วระดับโมเลกุลสู่การป้องกัน. ใน สมชาย เอี่ยมอ่อง, เกรียง ตั้งสง่า, และเกื้อเกียรติ ประดิษฐ์พรศิลป (บ.ก.), โรคไต กลไก พยาธิสรีรวิทยา การรักษา. กรุงเทพฯ: เทกซ์แอนด์เจอร์นอล.
สําเริง มาประชุม, วิมลรัตน์ หล่อนิมิตดี, ศาสตราวุธ ธรรมกิตติพันธ์. การวิเคราะห์ชนิดของนิ่วในไตโดยการใช้ Dual-energy computed tomography. วารสารรังสีวิทยาศิริราช. 2018;5(1):62-72.
Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG, et al. Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014;192(2):316-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.006
Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
World Health Organization. Global report on urinary tract stones: epidemiology and prevention [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2022 [cited 2025 May 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/urinary-tract-stones-global-report
Smith RC, Krinsky GA, Khazan R, et al. Dual-energy CT differentiation of calcium oxalate and uric acid renal stones: pilot study. Radiology. 2006;241(3):715-20.
Thai Ministry of Public Health. Health technology assessment report on dual-energy CT for kidney stone diagnosis. Bangkok: Ministry of Public Health; 2023.
Takeuchi M, Ichikawa I, Matsumoto T, et al. Urolithiasis: how accurate are plain radiographs? J Urol. 2008;179(4):1293-7.
Lee C, Meldrum P, Thanh L, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ultra-low-dose CT and X-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder for urolithiasis in the follow-up setting. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023;67(3):345-52.
McArthur C, Kennish SJ. Plain abdominal radiograph: radiolucent, semi-opaque and opaque urinary calculi. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42(5):1459-68.
Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(11):654-62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2016.154
Geavlete B, Multescu R, Georgescu D, et al. Current diagnostic and therapeutic options for urinary tract stones. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):220.
Wayne WD. Biostatistics: a foundation of analysis in the health sciences. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1995.
Rojanavijitkul P, Tantigate P, Ratchanon S, Usawachintachit M, Pongpirul K, Chaopathomkul B. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT to determine urinary tract stone composition: differentiating between uric acid and non-uric acid urinary tract stones. Chula Med J. 2022;66(1):75-81. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.CMJ.66.1.10
Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Rentsch K, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for the differentiation of uric acid stones: ex vivo performance evaluation. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(4):458-64.
Thomas C, Heuschmid M, Schilling D, et al. Dual-energy CT for the characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(5):1363-70.
Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, et al. Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(12):1471-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Singburi Hospital Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The published articles are copyrighted by Singburi Hospital.
The statements appearing in each article in this academic journal are the personal opinions of each author and are not related in any way to Singburi Hospital or other hospital personnel. Each author is solely responsible for all contents of their article. If there are any errors, each author alone will be responsible for their own article.
