A Comparison of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in Patients with Fragility Hip Fractures Undergoing Surgery within 48 Hours versus after 48 Hours

Authors

  • CHINNAWAT BAITIANG Department of Orthopaedics, Chaophraya Yommarat Hospital, Suphan Buri

Keywords:

Fragility hip fractures, Surgery within 48hours, Surgery after 48-hours, Barthel Index

Abstract

Background: Hip surgery within the first 48 hours has been supported as a treatment approach that helps achieve successful outcomes for patients with hip fracture. This study aimed to compare the Activities of Daily Living (ADL), mortality, late complication, and hip fracture recurrence rate between patients with hip fractures who underwent surgery within 48 hours and those who underwent surgery after 48 hours

Method: A retrospective study was conducted in 291 patients with fragility hip fractures aged over 50 years and admitted to the Chaophrayayommarat Hospital from January to December 2021. The patients were divided into two study groups:  those undergoing surgery within 48 hours and those undergoing surgery after 48 hours. Descriptive statistics, independence t-test, and Chi-square test were used to analyze data.

Results: The study revealed that those undergoing surgery within 48 hours had a higher mean Barthel Index score compared with patients who had surgery after 48 hours (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the rate of mortality, late complications, and recurrent hip fractures between the two groups.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing surgery within 48 hours had a significantly higher ADL compared with the other group had better quality of life and health status. Their ability to walk improved before going home and the duration of hospital stay reduced. Therefore, a continuous follow-up of surgical care outcomes within 48 hours was recommended as a decision-making guideline for the appropriate duration of care for patients undergoing hip surgery.

References

Rapp K, Büchele G, Dreinhöfer K, Bücking B, Becker C, Benzinger P. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019; 52:10-6.

Ahmed RA, Marrie TJ, Huang JQ. Thoracic empyema in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med 2006;119(10):877-83.3.

Wajanavisit W, Woratanarat P, Sawatriawkul S, Lertbusayanukul C, Ongphiphadhanakul B. Cost-Utility Analysis of Osteoporotic Hip Fractures in Thais. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015; 98 Suppl 8:S65-9.

Roberts KC, Brox WT, Jevsevar DS, Sevarino K. Management of hip fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23:131-7.

Cauley JA, Chalhoub D, Kassem AM, Fuleihan Gel H. Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures. Nature reviews Endocrinology. 2014; 10:338-51.

Kanis JA, Oden A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, Cooper CJOi. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int.2012; 23(9): 2239–2256

Phadungkiat S, Chariyalertsak S, Rajatanavin R, Chiengthong K, Suriyawongpaisal P, Woratanarat P. Incidence of hip fracture in Chiang Mai. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002; 85:565-71.

Vaseenon T, Luevitoonvechkij S, Wongtriratanachai P, Rojanasthien S. Long-term mortality after osteoporotic hip fracture in Chiang Mai, Thailand. J Clin Densitom. 2010; 13:63-7.

Yusuwan K. A comparison of the success rate of surgery in the first 48 hours and other complications between the traditional care and the fast-track surgery in patients with hip fracture, Chaophraya Yommarat Hospital. Singburi Hospital Journal. 2021; 30:39 - 52.

Atthakomol P, Manosroi W, Phinyo P, Pipanmekaporn T, Vaseenon T, Rojanasthien S. Prognostic factors for all-cause mortality in Thai patients with fragility fracture of hip: comorbidities and laboratory evaluations. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56:311.

Abeygunasekara T, Lekamwasam S, Lenora J, Alwis G, research. Quality of Life and Functional Independence of Hip Fracture Patients: Data from a Single Center Follow-Up Study in Sri Lanka. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2021; 25:98.

Klestil T, Röder C, Stotter C, Winkler B, Nehrer S, Lutz M, et al. Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018; 8:13933.

Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, Ricci C, Virgili G, Salanti G, et al. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hours have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PloS one. 2012; 7:e46175.

Yaron N, Kuniavsky M, Alexander K, Olga B, Nethanel G, Shuli H, et al. Performing Hip Fracture Repair within 48 Hours from Admission May Decrease Mortality, the Israeli National Program for Quality Indicators Experience. J Geriatr Med Gerontol. 2021; 7.

Seong YJ, Shin WC, Moon NH, Suh KT. Timing of Hip-fracture Surgery in Elderly Patients: Literature Review and Recommendations. Hip Pelvis. 2020; 32:11-6.

Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Klar J, Lwanga SK, Organization WH. Adequacy of sample size in health studies: Chichester: Wiley; 1990.

Shyu Y-IL, Liang J, Wu C-C, Su J-Y, Cheng H-S, Chou S-W, et al. Interdisciplinary Intervention for Hip Fracture in Older Taiwanese: Benefits Last for 1 Year. J Gerontol A Biol Sci. 2008; 63:92-7.

Unnanuntana A, Jarusriwanna A, Nepal S. Validity and responsiveness of Barthel index for measuring functional recovery after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 2018; 138:1671-7.

Doruk H, Mas MR, Yildiz C, Sonmez A, Kýrdemir V. The effect of the timing of hip fracture surgery on the activity of daily living and mortality in elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004; 39:179-85.

Khiewamorn Y. Incidence and Factors Associated with 1-Year Mortality in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients Underwent Hip Surgery at Chaophrayayommarat Hospital. Region 4-5 Medical Journal. 2021; 40:439-48.

Downloads

Published

25-08-2023

How to Cite

1.
BAITIANG C. A Comparison of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in Patients with Fragility Hip Fractures Undergoing Surgery within 48 Hours versus after 48 Hours. Singburi Hosp J [internet]. 2023 Aug. 25 [cited 2025 Apr. 15];32(1):B113-124. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/shj/article/view/263208

Issue

Section

Research Articles