Experience of Helpful Events in Counseling from Clients’ Perspective

Main Article Content

สิรัช สุเมธกุล
Panita Suavansri
Nattasuda Taephant


This study explored the psychological experiences of clients with significant helpful events from counseling. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), a qualitative research method, was conducted on 6 participants via in-depth interviews. Three super-ordinate themes emerged. (1) Characteristics of the relationship perceived by the client, with 3 sub-ordinate themes: being able to talk, counselor’s attentiveness and common understanding, and focusing on client’s perception and consideration of internal world. (2) Process of new understanding emerging from significant helpful events, with 4 sub-ordinate themes: exploring and trying to understand one’s experience, changing/challenging one’s old beliefs or understandings, trying new things or resolutions derived from sessions, and expanding one’s perspectives or alternatives. (3) Impacts of adopting new understandings, with 2 sub-ordinate themes changes in capabilities of dealing with problems/circumstances, and self-acceptance and living in harmony with one’s problems. This study gives an overview of experiences, change mechanism, and outcomes of the clients from counseling. Literatures relevant to the study are discussed.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Research Article


1. Paulson BL, Truscott D, Stuart J. Clients’ perceptions of helpful experiences in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1999 Jul;46(3):317–24.
2. Rodgers B. An investigation into the client at the heart of therapy. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2002 Sep;2(3):185–93.
3. Levitt HM, Pomerville A, Surace FI. A qualitative meta-analysis examining clients’ experiences of psychotherapy: A new agenda. Psychological Bulletin. 2016 Aug;142(8):801–30.
4. Elliott R. Helpful and Nonhelpful Events in Brief Counseling Interviews: An Empirical Taxonomy. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1985;32(3):307–22.
5. Timulak L. Identifying core categories of client-identified impact of helpful events in psychotherapy: A qualitative meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research. 2007 May 1;17(3):305–14.
6. Giorgi B. A Phenomenological Analysis of the Experience of Pivotal Moments in Therapy as Defined by Clients. J Phenomenol Psychol. 2011;42(1):61–106.
7. Clarke H, Rees A, Hardy GE. The big idea: Clients’ perspectives of change processes in cognitive therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2004;77(1):67–89.
8. Ng CTC, James S. Counselor empathy or “Having a heart to help”? An ethnographic investigation of Chinese clients’ experience of counseling. The Humanistic Psychologist. 2013;41(4):333–49.
9. Timulak L, Belicova A, Miler M. Client identified significant events in a successful therapy case: The link between the significant events and outcome. Counselling Psychology Quarterly. 2010 Dec;23(4):371–86.
10. Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Reprinted 2010. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 225 p.
11. Elliott R, Bohart AC, Watson JC, Murphy D. Therapist empathy and client outcome: An updated meta-analysis. Psychotherapy. 2018 Dec;55(4):399–410.
12. Grencavage LM, Norcross JC. Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? Professional psychology: Research and practice. 1990;21(5):372–8.
13. Bachelor A. Clients’ and Therapists’ Views of the Therapeutic Alliance: Similarities, Differences and Relationship to Therapy Outcome. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2013;20(2):118–35.
14. Heppner PP, Krauskopf CJ. An Information-Processing Approach to Personal Problem Solving. The Counseling Psychologist. 1987 Jul 1;15(3):371–447.
15. Greenberg LS. Emotion–focused therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2004;11(1):3–16.
16. Ribeiro AP, Bento T, Salgado J, Stiles WB, Gonçalves MM. A dynamic look at narrative change in psychotherapy: A case study tracking innovative moments and protonarratives using state space grids. Psychotherapy Research. 2011 Jan 1;21(1):54–69.
17. Donald IN, Carey TA. Improving knowledge about the effectiveness of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy & Politics International. 2017 Oct;15(3):n/a-N.PAG.
18. Moltu C, Stefansen J, Nøtnes JC, Skjølberg Å, Veseth M. What are “good outcomes” in public mental health settings? A qualitative exploration of clients’ and therapists’ experiences. International Journal of Mental Health Systems. 2017 Jan 14;11:1.
19. Cardoso P, Silva JR, Gonçalves MM, Duarte ME. Innovative moments and change in Career Construction Counseling. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2014 Feb 1;84(1):11–20.
20. De Smet MM, Meganck R, De Geest R, Norman UA, Truijens F, Desmet M. What “good outcome” means to patients: Understanding recovery and improvement in psychotherapy for major depression from a mixed-methods perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2020 Jan;67(1):25–39.