Surgical Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in patient with nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital by General Ophthalmologist

Main Article Content

นเรศ พินิจราชกิจ

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endoscopic DCR) is an effective alternative treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. But mostly this operation is performed by oculoplastic surgeon. Since, Chiangrai Prachanukroh hospital has not an ophthalmologist specializes in this field, therefore, we set up a potential development project for the general ophthalmologist to be able to perform this operation.


Objective: To evaluate surgical outcome of endoscopic DCR in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Chiangrai Prachanukroh hospital by general ophthalmologist.


Methods: A retrospective review of 32 patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who performed endoscopic DCR without preservation of lacrimal sac flap technique from January 2016 to December 2020 in Department of Ophthalmology, Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital were included in this study. The cases that followed less than 3 months were excluded. Silicone tube was placed for 3 months. The outcomes were subjective improvement in epiphora and the patency of the lacrimal drainage system using irrigation test.


Results: A total of 32 patients were included in this study. The surgical success group was 28 cases (87.50%). The mean age of the patient was 54.46±13.62 years and 67.25±4.92 years in the surgical success group and the failure groups respectively (p=0.076). The majority of patients were women (5:1). The operation success group was all 5 men patients and 23 women patients. All patients in failure group were women (100.00%). One patient was postoperative bleeding. There was no serious complication. No significant difference of preoperative factor, age, gender, side, postoperative stent removal time (p-value>0.05).


Conclusion and RECOMMENDATION: Endoscopic DCR is an effective alternative treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction which can performed by a general ophthalmologist with a good outcome. Doing this operative in the hospitals with no oculoplastic surgeon will useful in reducing waiting time for surgery and good benefit in the public health system.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
พินิจราชกิจ น. Surgical Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in patient with nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital by General Ophthalmologist. crmj [internet]. 2022 Apr. 30 [cited 2025 Dec. 20];14(1):31-43. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/crmjournal/article/view/252617
Section
Original Articles

References

Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(8):1463-8.

Dailey RA, Marx DP. Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. In: Black EH, Nesi FA, Gladstone GJ, Levine MR, editors. Smith and nesi’s ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2012. p.676-78.

Flach A. The fluorescein appearance test for lacrimal obstruction. Ann Ophthalmol. 1979; 11(2):237-42.

Saratziotis A, Emanuelli E, Gouveris H, Babighian G. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: creating a window with a drill without use of mucosal flaps. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129(9):992-5.

Leong SC, Macewen CJ, White PS. A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010;24(1):81-90

Keren S, Abergel A, Manor A, Rosenblatt A, Koenigstein D, Leibovitch I, et al. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: reasons for failure. Eye (Lond). 2020 ;34(5):948-53.

Hodgson N, Bratton E, Whipple K, Priel A, Oh SR, Fante RG, et al. Outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap preservation. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30(1):24-7.

Kingdom TT, Barham HP, Durairaj VD. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap preservation. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(1):12-7.

Kansu L, Aydin E, Avci S, Kal A, Gedik S. Comparison of surgical outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with or without mucosal flaps. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36(5):555-9.

Unlu HH, Toprak B, Aslan A, Guler C. Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111(8):704-9.

Allen K, Berlin AJ. Dacryocystorhinostomy failure: association with nasolacrimal silicone intubation. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989;20(7):486-9.

Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Teräsvirta M, Nuutinen J, Seppä J. Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(2):214-7.

Al-Qahtani AS. Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012;26(4):332-4.

Kang MG, Shim WS, Shin DK, Kim JY, Lee JE, Jung HJ. A Systematic review of benefit of silicone intubation in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;11(2):81-8.

Mak ST, Io IY, Wong AC. Prognostic factors for outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(5):1361-7.

Wanumkarng N, Nimitwongsakul A, Nimkan A, Pongpirul K. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy modification techniques: a 12-year experience. J Med Assoc Thai 2019;102(7):783-8.

Cheng SM, Feng YF, Xu L, Li Y, Huang JH. Efficacy of mitomycin C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e62737.