Outcomes of Secondary Prevention Medications in Patients with Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome at One year after Hospital Discharge
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of evidence-based medications used for secondary prevention in patients with NSTE-ACS (non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) at one year after hospital discharge. Method: This research was a retrospective analytical cohort study. The data from medical records in electronic databases of two hospitals was collected from October 2015 to September 2018. Recruitment criteria were patients who were diagnosed with NSTE-ACS, aged 18 years and over, and hospitalized and discharged with surviving status. The data on the prescribing of four medications for secondary prevention including dual anti-platelets, beta-blockers (BBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), statins was collected. The study outcome of post-discharge adverse events (AEs) at 1-year follow-up was collected. The AEs incidence was analyzed compared between the group received four medications and the group received less than four medications by using a Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis adjusted with propensity score. Results: Of the 334 patients in the study, 44 received four medications for secondary prevention (13.17%) and 290 patients receive less than four medications for secondary prevention (86.83%). The incidence of AEs at one year in those receiving four medications decreased by 6% when compared with those received less than four medications (adjusted HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.56-1.57; P=0.814). The rates of prescribing four medications significantly increased at 6 and 12 months of follow-up when compared with the day of hospital discharge (13.17% vs. 27.98%; P<0.001, 13.17% vs. 27.49%; P<0.001, respectively). Co-morbidities including congestive heart failure (adjusted OR 0.30, 95%CI 0.12-0.77; P= 0.012) and chronic kidney disease (adjusted OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.09-0.67; P=0.006) were significantly associated with less incidence in the group received four medications. Hospital where patients received treatment was a significant factor associated with an increase in prescribing of four medications (adjusted OR 7.82, 95%CI 2.04-29.4; P=0.003). Conclusion: The patients with NSTE-ACS received four medications for secondary prevention significantly more at 1-year follow-up period. The hospital was a significant factor associated with an increase in the prescribing of four medications for secondary prevention. Congestive heart failure and chronic renal disease were significantly associated with less incidence in patients received four medications.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ผลการวิจัยและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความถือเป็นความคิดเห็นและอยู่ในความรับผิดชอบของผู้นิพนธ์ มิใช่ความเห็นหรือความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ หรือคณะเภสัชศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์ ทั้งนี้ไม่รวมความผิดพลาดอันเกิดจากการพิมพ์ บทความที่ได้รับการเผยแพร่โดยวารสารเภสัชกรรมไทยถือเป็นสิทธิ์ของวารสารฯ
References
Policy and Strategy Office of the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Public Health. Public health statistics [online]. [cited Jun 18, 2018]. Available from: www.thaincd.com/2016/mission/documents.ph p?tid=32&gid=1-020
Tunstall PH, Kuulasmaa K, Mähönen M, Tolonen H, Ruokokoski E AP. Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA project populations. Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease. Lancet 1999; 353: 1547-57.
Rogers WJ, Frederick PD, Stoehr E, Canto JG, Ornato JP GC. Trends in presenting characteristics and hospital mortality among patients with ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Hear J. 2008; 156: 1026-34.
Fox KAA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ 2006; 333: 1091.
Srimahachota S, Kanjanavanit R, Boonyaratavej S, et al. Thai registry in acute coronary syndrome registry (TRACS) Group: Lower in-hospital but still high mortality at one-year. J Med assoc Thai 2012; 95: 508-18.
Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, Nørgaard BL, et al. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: Observa- tions from an unselected cohort. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 18-26.
Braunwald E. ACC/AHA Guideline Update for the Management of patients with unstable angina and non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: Summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidel. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1893-900.
Vogel B , Hahne S, Kozanli I, Kalla K, Jarai R, Freynhofer M, Smetana P, Nürnberg M, Geppert A, Unger
G HK. Influence of updated guidelines on short- and long-term mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Int J Cardiol. 2012; 159: 198-204.
Hengrassami K. Situation of ST elevation myocar- dial infarction in Thailand in standardand referral system of acute myocardial infarction 2554. Bangkok: Sukumvit Printing; 2011.
Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-st-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014; 130: e344-e426.
Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet J-P, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 267-315.
Hengrassami K. Standardand referral system of acute myocardial infarction 2017. Nonthaburi: Central Chest Institute, Ministry of Public Health; 2017.
Ariyapim N, Suksomboon N, Wongvipaporn C, Chaikledkaew U. The rationale to guideline of treatment for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Thai Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 2007; 17: 68-76.
Kasemsup P, Kongsri S, Cheawchanwattana A, Limwattananon C. Drug treatments and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients in secondary-care hospital. Isan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2011; 7: 29-39
Byeon HJ, Yang Y, Choi EJ. Optimal medical therapy for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome: 18-month follow-up results at a tertiary teaching hospital in South Korea. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2016; 12: 167–75.
Alan JB, Andrew TY, Raymond TY, Cindy HL, et al. Optimal medical therapy for non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndromes : Exploring why physicians do not prescribe evidence-based treatment and why patients discontinue medications after discharge. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010; 3: 530-7.
Jackevicius CA, Li P, Tu J V. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of primary nonadherence after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008; 117: 1028-36.
Nguyen T, Le KK, Cao HTK, et al. Association between in-hospital guideline adherence and postdischarge major adverse outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Vietnam: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e017008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017008
Lee HY, Cooke CE, Robertson TA. Use of secondary prevention drug therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after hospital discharge. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008; 14: 271-80.