The Evaluation of the Bachelor of Nursing Curriculum Revised Edition 2012, Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Uttaradit
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This descriptive research aimed to evaluate the bachelor of nursing curriculum revised edition 2012, Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Uttaradit. Research samples comprised 12 members of academic board, 11 nurse lecturers, 79 fourth-year nursing students, 10 nurse preceptors and 10 employers. The research instruments consisted of the questionnaire related to the evaluation of the bachelor of nursing curriculum revised edition 2012 which had Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .95 and the focus group method. Data were analyzed by mean, standard deviation and a content analysis approach
Research findings were as follow:
1. For the dimension of the curriculum context, the overall average score in the opinions of academic board members, nurse lecturers and nursing students was in high level ( = 4.33, 4.48, 4.12; SD = .31, .57, .46 respectively).
2. For the dimension of the input factor, the overall average score in the opinions of academic board members and nurse lecturers was in high level ( = 3.77, 3.97; SD = .48, .36 respectively).
The overall average score in nursing students’ opinions was in moderate level ( = 3.36; SD = .57).
3. For the dimension of the process factor, the overall average score in the opinions of academic board members, nurse lecturers and nursing students was in high level ( = 4.18, 4.36, 3.85; SD = .44, .52, .47 respectively).
4. For the output dimension, the overall average score in the opinions of academic board members, nurse lecturers and nursing students was in high level ( = 4.01, 4.25, 3.60; SD=.29, .29, .32
respectively).
Article Details
Journal of Nursing and Health Science Research attribution-non-commercial 4.0 international (CC BY-NC 4.0). For more detail please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . The ideas and opinions expressed in the Journal of Nursing and Health Science Research are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the editor .
References
2. Kanjanawasi, S. (2010). Curriculum evaluation: Principle and Guideline. Retrieved April 16, 2016, from Web site :https://www.edu.tsu.ac.th/major/old_eva/journal/scan1.pdf. (in Thai)
3. Khamtana, P., Atthamethakul, W., and Sriyotin, B. (2011).Evaluating Bachelor of Nursing Science Curriculum (Revised Curriculum 2550 B.E). Boromarajonani college of nursing, Ratchaburi. (in Thai)
4. Ministry of Education. (2010). The National Education Act, B.E.2553(2010). Bangkok Soutpaisallaw printing. (in Thai)
5. Ritcharun, P. (2015). Curriculum Evaluation: Approaches, Procedures, and Its Utility. Journal of Education,8(1) : 13-27. (in Thai)
6. Soowit, B., bachelor Satasuwan, A., Lhaosupab, N., and Jongthammanurak, N. (2015). An Evaluation of the bachelor of nursing curriculum (revised edition 2012), Kuakarun Faculty of Nursing, Navamindradhiraj University in 2012-2013. Kuakarun Journal of Nursing, 22(2): 71-90. (in Thai)
7. Thagleawpun, J., et al. (2011). Bachelor of Nursing Science Curriculum (Revised Curriculum 2550 B.E). Boromarajonani college of nursing, Uttaradit. (Mimeographed) (in Thai)
8. Thongswas, T., Somboon, L., Singhanetr, S., Soparate, P., and Serametagul., D. (2014). The curriculum evaluation of the bachelor’s Degree of Nursing Science, Faculty of Nursing, Chiangrai College in Academic Year, 2009.Journal of Nursing and Education, 7(1): 109-121. (in Thai)
