Main Article Content
This research is a qualitative research that uses focus group discussion. The objective is to study the problems and obstacles to the use of the first multiple injury patients assessment model. The current form used in the accident and neurological surgery ward. Implemented 2 times in November 2018 and December 2018. Informants were 15 professional nurses, purposive sampling was chosen. The research instruments consisted of 1) questionnaire in group discussion 2) record while in group discussion 3) voice recorder data were collected by group discussion. The data were analyzed by using Typological Analysis of Miles and Huberman (1994), with the data subjects giving meaning to important messages or sentences and used to organize the information system.
The results of the research from the focus group discussion were as follows:
1) the patient's meaning. Multiple system injuries comes from work experience that finds patients admitted in the wards into patients. The injury occurs in two or more systems of
the body or may occur at the same time 2) the most likely cause come from traffic accident. The most common time for seeing a patient is on the weekends or during various festivals
3) assessment characteristics of obstacles encountered during the present evaluation found the following points difficulty in evaluating multiple injury systems using the Gordon framework. there are broad in scope and difficult because there are many questions, no specificity in trauma assessment, make use of the time period for evaluation In terms of dimension, value, and belief (Value-Belief Pattern). In case of unconsciousness or have delirium, or have no relatives, will not be able to assess patients. Assessment depends on the competencies of professional nurses in nursing who have experience of caring for trauma patients in the novice group or in the advance beginner group, unable to fully evaluate the important details compared to the more experienced assessors and 4) the characteristics of the first condition assessment form for injury patients who need to develop physical examination should be recorded according to guidelines. Assessment of injury patients by systematic examination have pictures or have a check list system such as details of wound, type deformation of the injured organ make it easy to understand, easy to communicate, convey information in a multidisciplinary team. Assessing the severity of the injury and information on behavior, expression at the first reception of patients. This will lead to the determination of nursing diagnosis and able to provide accurate and comprehensive nursing for trauma patients
Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Uttaradit Journal attribution-non-commercial 4.0 international (CC BY-NC 4.0). For more detail please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . The ideas and opinions expressed in the Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Uttaradit are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the editor .
2) Arttanuchit, S. (2009). Development and evaluation of nursing practice guideline for initial assessment of multiple injury patients at trauma units in Pattani hospital. (Master’s thesis). Prince of Songkla University. (in Thai).
3) Biffl, W. L., Harrington, D. T., & Cioffi, W. G. (2003). Implementation of a tertiary trauma survey decreases missed injuries. The Journal of Trauma, Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 54 (1), 38-44.
4) Butcher, N. E., Balogh, Z. J. (2014). Updateon the definition of polytrauma. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 40(2), 107–11.
5) Ibrahim, F. (2003). Nursing practice according to nursing theory. Bangkok: Samcharoen Commercial. (in Thai)
6) Keijzers, G. B., Giannakopolous, G. F., Mar, C., Bakker, F. C., Geeraedts, Jr, L. M (2012). The effect of tertiary on missed injuries in trauma: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medication, 20, 1-9.
7) Keijzers, G. B., Mar, C. D., Geeraedts, Jr, L. M., Byrnes, J. & Beller., E. M. (2015). What is the effect of a formalized trauma tertiary survey procedure on missed injury rates in multi-trauma patients? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trail. The World Journal of Surgery, 16, 1-8.
8) Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
9) Office of Policy and Strategy Ministry of Public Health. (2012). Top 10 death statistics: 2010-2011. Bangkok; Veterans Organization. (in Thai).
10) Petersen, V. (2005). The tertiary trauma survey What, Why, When, How & Who: Detecting Missed Injuries in the Multiply-Injured Patient. Retrieved (2019, May 17) from http://www.trauma.org/archive/nurse/tertiarysurvey.htm
11) Phuengbunhan, K., Pamosinlapathum, T. & Mechan, L. (2014). Developing a Model of Caring for the Critical Multiple Trauma Patients in Uttaradit Hospital. Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Uttaradit Journal, 6(1), 24-37. (in Thai).
12) Saehia,V. & Zongwattana, P. (2013). The development of clinical practice guideline for initial assessment of for patients with multiple injuries admitted to hospitals. Songkhla: Faculty of Nursing Prince of Songkla University. (in Thai).
13) Sennunt, K., Thosingha, O., & Sindhu, S. (2008). Emergency resuscitation in trauma patients: A literary analysis. Thai Journal of Nursing Council, 23 (3), 26-39. (in Thai).
14) Thepmusik, P., Chamnanphol, S., Kraythong, N., Phonwisut, S., Nilas, J. & Meenongwah, J. (2017). Knowledge regarding to delirium, monitoring, and management in critical illpatients among nurses at Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital. Journal of Health Science. Boromarajonani College of Nursing Sunpasitthiprasong, 1(2), 70-85. (in Thai).
15) Trauma and neurological surgery unit. (2017). Summary of annual information about the trauma and neurological surgery unit. Phrae Hospital. (in Thai).
16) Vioque, S. M., Cladera, P. R., Aufroy, A. L., Diaz, C. G., & Bayo, H. L. (2013). Tertiary survey in the management of patients with multiple injury. Emergencias, 25, 105-110.