Development of an Electric Motor–Driven Mobile X-ray Cart at Surat Thani Cancer Hospital

Authors

  • Tatchanon Srithong Suratthani Cancer Hospital

Keywords:

Mobile X-ray Cart, Electric Motor, Performance Efficiency, Radiologic Technologists

Abstract

This Research and Development (R&D) design study aimed to develop and evaluate the performance and usability of an electric motor–driven mobile X-ray cart, as well as to assess user's satisfaction. The sample consisted of 12 radiology technologists, selected through purposive sampling, based on predefined criteria. The research was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 involved the development of the electric motor–driven mobile X-ray cart, comprising three stages: a) needs assessment and analysis, b) design and drafting, and c) preliminary testing with refinement. Phase 2 inclided the evaluation of performance and user satisfaction. Research instruments were: a) the mobile X-ray cart prototype, and b) the assessment forms on performance and satisfaction. The content validity index (IOC) was evaluated by experts, yielding .86. Data were collected from December 2024 to March 2025, then analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and independent t-test, at the .05 significance level. Results showed as follows.

1. The developed prototype measured 70×80×11 cm and weighed 20.70 kg, with a maximum load capacity of 250 kg. The structure was made of galvanized steel with anti-corrosion properties. It was equipped with two 350-watt, 36-volt, brushless DC motors, and powered by a 36 volt, 8 Ah lithium-ion battery. The battery required 2 hours for a full charge and supported continuous operation for up to 7 hours or 15 km. Speed was controlled via a hand throttle within a range of 1–5 km/h, and the cart could climb slopes of up to 10 degrees.

2. Post-development performance evaluation (M = 3.91, SD = 0.61) was significantly higher than pre-development (M = 2.51, SD = 0.44) (t = -5.57, p-value < .001). The highest-rated aspect was ease of movement and operation (M = 4.25, SD = 0.75) User satisfaction after development (M = 4.18, SD = 0.34) was also significantly higher than before (M = 2.00, SD = 0.23) (t = -14.57, p-value < .001), with the highest satisfaction in movement speed (M = 4.58, SD = 0.67)

In conclusion, the newly developed electric motor–driven mobile X-ray cart demonstrates higher performance and user satisfaction compared to conventional methods. It can be effectively implemented to reduce workload, enhance safety, and improve the efficiency of medical services at Surat Thani Cancer Hospital.

References

กรมการแพทย์. (2562). แผนปฏิบัติราชการนวัตกรรมทางการแพทย์ พ.ศ. 2562-2570 กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. สืบค้นเมื่อ 25 ตุลาคม 25689 จาก https://www.dms.go.th/

เกียรติสุดา สิงห์โตทอง. (2552). ระเบียบวิธีวิจัย (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3). เชียงใหม่: ก้องช้าง.

ธนันต์ ศรีสกุล, พูนศักดิ์ บุญประสิทธิ์, วรวุฒิ แก้ววิชิต, วิษณุ อักขยาภุนดุ และสรวิศ ตรีเพ็ญมาศ. (2552). การพัฒนาสเก็ตบร์ดไฟฟ้า. WHAT THAI Electronics, 4(41), 114-119. https://ph03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/trusci/article/view/515

ปลื้มทรัพย์ สงวนประเสริฐ, ปาหุมันโต้ อับดุลรอฮิม, แก้ววิชิต อรุณ, อักขยาภุนดุ วิษณุ และตรีเพ็ญมาศ สรวิศ. (2559). การวิจัยและพัฒนารถเข็นอาหารผู้ป่วยที่ขับเคลื่อนด้วยมอเตอร์ไฟฟ้าสำหรับใช้ในโรงพยาบาล. วารสารวิชชา, 35(2), 16-32. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/wichcha/article/view/93411/0?utm_source=chatgpt.com

วสัน บุตรพา. (2564). การวิเคราะห์รังสีกระจายและการป้องกันรังสีระหว่างการเอกซเรย์เคลื่อนที่. วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์ไทย, 63(3), 660-674. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dmsc/article/view/246945

Best, J. W. (1970). Research in Education (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Designing Tolley. (2019). Hospital Trolley Design Guidelines. Retrieved October 23, 2025 from https://designingtrolley.com/hospital-trolley-design-guidelines/

Desouza, E. J., & Maslanyj, M. (2021). Quality control of mobile X-ray equipment: A 5-year analysis. The British Journal of Radiology, 94(1117), 20200906. doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200906

George, J., & Kamath, V. R. (2020). Speed control of BLDC motor using the PWM technique. International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 11(6), 30-38.

Justin, S. (2021, March 15). Types of Electric Vehicle Batteries. Virta Global. Retrieved October 23, 2025 from https://www.virta.global/blog/ev-battery-types

Khadka, K., & Maharjan, S. (2017). Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty: Case Trivsel städtjänster (Trivsel siivouspalvelut) (Master’s thesis). Retrieved November 5, 2025 from https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/139650

Manouchehri, N., Nguyen, H., Kowal, P., McArthur, A., & Vengalasetti, Y. S. (2017). Pediatric chest radiography: Optimization of technique and reduction of dose. Pediatric Radiology, 47(11), 1447-1456. doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3911-8

Morse, N. C. (1955). Satisfaction in the White Collar Job. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Nayak, M., Kamath, K., Karunakara, R. L. J., Anchan, S. S., & Saikrishna, U. (2015). Fabrication of Automated electronic trolley. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 12(3), 72-84.

Pan, F., Ye, T., Sun, P., Gui, S., Liang, B., Li, L., et al. (2020). Time course of lung changes at chest CT during recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology, 295(3), 715-721. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200370

Tagliaferri, S., Miller, C. T., Ford, J. J., Hahne, A. J., Main, L. C., Rantalainen, T., et al. (2018). Randomized trial of general strength and conditioning versus motor control and manual therapy for chronic low back pain on physical and self-report outcomes. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(11), 430. doi.org/10.3390/jcm7110430

Zhang, L., Diraneyya, M. M., Ryu, J., Haas, C. T., & Abdel-Rahman, E. (2018). Automated monitoring of physical fatigue using jerk. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 38, 45-55. doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.05.004

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08