Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Using PRISMA 2020 Guidelines for Nursing Management
Keywords:
Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, PRISMA 2020 Guidelines, Nursing ManagementAbstract
The development of nursing administration sciences based on Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is crucial for achieving quality and efficient nursing administration, as well as improving the quality of nursing organizations. This leads to positive outcomes for service recipients and contributes to the sustainability of nursing organizations. Synthesizing research and conducting meta-analyses of existing studies are essential for making informed decisions in nursing leadership and practice. The principles and key procedures of using PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020) serve as updated guidelines, replacing the earlier version from 2009. These reflect advancements in methodology and terminology for systematic literature reviews. The goal is to help authors report transparently and rigorously. This approach is vital for the reliability and application of the research outcomes obtained from the reviews. This is particularly important in enhancing the quality of decision-making in administration and policy development in nursing management, ultimately leading to precise strategic planning in healthcare and nursing services. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines include nine steps for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
References
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley.
Chen, Y., Zhou, Z., Bai, X., Liu, B., Chen F., Chang L., et al. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of social support on turnover intention in clinical nurses. Occupational Health and Safety, 12, 1-15. doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1393024
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PLoS Medicine Study Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D. et al. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Pratakkulvongsa, S., & Singchangchai., P. (2024). A systematic review on leadership styles and strategic performance in the private health sector. The Southern College Network Journal of Nursing and Public Health, 11(3), e271396. (in Thai)
Qtait., M. (2023). Systematic review of head nurse leadership style and nurse performance. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 18, 1-7. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2023.10056
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Southern College Network Journal of Nursing and Public Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. บทความหรือข้อคิดเห็นใด ๆ ที่ปรากฏในวารสารเครือข่าย วิทยาลัยพยาบาลและการสาธารณสุขภาคใต้ ที่เป็นวรรณกรรมของผู้เขียน บรรณาธิการหรือเครือข่ายวิทยาลัยพยาบาลและวิทยาลัยการสาธารณสุขภาคใต้ ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย
2. บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ วารสารเครือข่ายวิทยาลัยพยาบาลและการสาธารณสุขภาคใต้
