Comparison of union rate between internal fixation using intramedullary nail and interlocking plate in patients with an intertrochanteric fracture of femur in Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital

Authors

  • Thanomchai Kodwongsa Orthopedics, Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubonratchathani
  • Wirampa Lamanchai Department of Radiology, Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubonratchathani

Keywords:

Intertrochanteric fracture, Union rate, Intraoperative blood loss, Length of stay in hospital, Intra operative time

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to compare the union rates between surgical treatments using intramedullary nail and interlocking plate in patients with intertrochanteric fractures at Sanprasitthiprasong Hospital. The 304 adult participants (mean age 73, 41-92 years) with intertrochanteric fractures classified according to AO/OTA classification 31A1.1, 31A2.1, 31A3.1, 31A1.2, 31A.2, 31A2.2, and 31A3.2 underwent surgery within 2 weeks of the incident. Participants received hip X-rays (both hip AP view and lateral cross table view) to assess radiographic union at 3 and 6 months. Union rates were calculated at 3 and 6 months. The results found that at the 3-month mark, the union rate for both plate and nail groups was 0. At the 6-month assessment, the plate group showed a union rate of 83.6% (127 individuals), while the nail group exhibited a rate of 80.9% (123 individuals). The difference in union rates between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = .051). Additionally, an analysis of hospital stay duration revealed no significant difference between the plate and nail groups (p = 0.245). The blood loss rate during surgery also showed no significant difference (p = 0.789). However, a significant difference was observed in the duration of surgery between the two groups (p < 0.001). In conclusions, there was no statistically significant difference in the union rates between patients who underwent surgery with a plate and those with a nail. Similarly, there was no significant difference in terms of blood loss rates and hospital stay duration. The significant difference observed was in the duration of the surgical procedure. This information could be valuable for making decisions regarding the choice of implant for surgical procedures in patients at Sappasitthiprasong Hospital in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nasab SAM, Khorramdin E. The assessment of mortality and quality of life after intertrochanteric fracture of femur in patients older than 60 at Emam Khomeini Hospital of Ahvaz. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(4):895-8.

Mnif H, Koubaa M, Zrig M, Trabelsi R, Abid A. Elderly patient's mortality and morbidity following trochanteric fracture. A prospective study of 100 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(7):505-10.

Zhou Y, Xia C, Ma X, Yu X, editors. Clinical Efficacy of Intramedullary Fixation vs. Plate Fixation for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures 2020.

Singh AK, Narsaria N, G RA, Srivastava V. Treatment of Unstable Trochanteric Femur Fractures: Proximal Femur Nail Versus Proximal Femur Locking Compression Plate. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46(2):E116-e23.

Sandhu DKS, Kahal DKS, Singh DS, Bhardwaj DR, Sareen DA. A comparative study of proximal trochanteric contoured plate vs proximal femoral nail for unstable inter-trochanteric fracture of femur. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2019;5(2):942-7.

Jingen H, Junwei Z, Caibao H. Comparative study on proximal femur locking plate and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation II in treating intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. Biomedical Research 2017;S465-S8.

Zhang WQ, Sun J, Liu CY, Zhao HY, Sun YF. Comparing the Intramedullary Nail and Extramedullary Fixation in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2321.

Wutphiriya-angkul S. Comparison of Gamma Nail and Locking Plate inTreatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures. The THAI Journal of SURGERY 2016;37:146-52.

Barquet A, Francescoli L, Rienzi D, López L. Intertrochanteric-Subtrochanteric Fractures: Treatment With the Long Gamma Nail. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2000;14(5).

Hoffmann MF, Khoriaty JD, Sietsema DL, Jones CB. Outcome of intramedullary nailing treatment for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1): 360.

Lee WT, Murphy D, Kagda FHY, Thambiah J. Proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate for Proximal Femoral Fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2014;22(3):287-93.

Zha G-C, Chen Z-L, Qi X-B, Sun J-Y. Treatment of pertrochanteric fractures with a proximal femur locking compression plate. Injury 2011;42(11):1294-9.

Davis BJ, Roberts PJ, Moorcroft CI, Brown MF, Thomas PBM, Wade RH. Reliability of radiographs in defining union of internally fixed fractures. Injury 2004;35(6):557-61.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-22

How to Cite

Kodwongsa, T., & Lamanchai, W. (2025). Comparison of union rate between internal fixation using intramedullary nail and interlocking plate in patients with an intertrochanteric fracture of femur in Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital. Journal of Medicine and Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani University, 8(1), 64–72. retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmpubu/article/view/272421

Issue

Section

Research Articles