The effects of a psychosocial rehabilitation program on functioning in individuals with bipolar disorder

Authors

  • Sukita Viroon, M.N.S. Srithanya Hospital, Department of Mental Health, Nonthaburi Province, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64838/jmht.2026.287005

Keywords:

bipolar disorder, functioning, psychosocial rehabilitation, recovery, social rhythm

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of a psychosocial rehabilitation program on functioning in individuals with bipolar disorder.

Methods: A controlled experimental study was conducted among 40 inpatients with remitted bipolar disorder. The experimental group (n = 20) received usual care combined with a psychosocial rehabilitation program developed by integrating a recovery-oriented approach and interpersonal and social rhythm therapy. The program consisted of activities to promote understanding of the illness, treatment, and early warning signs, as well as training in emotion management and life-planning skills. The program was delivered once a day for five consecutive days, for a total of five sessions. The control group (n = 20) received usual care only. Functional impairment, including personal development, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships, and leisure time, was assessed at baseline and one month after the intervention using the Functioning Assessment Short Test. Between-group differences and within-group changes were evaluated using independent t-test and paired t-test, respectively.

Results: The experimental and control groups were comparable in demographics, the severity of manic and depressive symptoms, and the baseline FAST scores (mean = 59.58, SD = 10.12; mean = 58.20, SD = 9.64, respectively). After the intervention, the experimental group exhibited a significantly lower mean FAST total score than the control group (mean = 36.65, SD = 7.71; mean = 42.15, SD = 8.11, respectively; t = -2.198, p = .034). Both groups demonstrated statistically significant decreases in the mean scores from baseline (t = 6.716, p < .001; t = 6.000, p < .001, respectively).

Conclusion: The psychosocial rehabilitation program reduced functional impairment in individuals with bipolar disorder, compared with usual care. The program could be applied as an adjunctive intervention to enhance functional rehabilitation outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Grande I, Berk M, Birmaher B, Vieta E. Bipolar disorder. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1561-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00241-X

Ratheesh A, Hett D, Ramain J, Wong E, Berk L, Conus P, et al. A systematic review of interventions in the early course of bipolar disorder I or II: a report of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Taskforce on early intervention. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2023;11(1):1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-022-00275-3

Vieta E, Berk M, Schulze TG, Carvalho AF, Suppes T, Calabrese JR, et al. Bipolar disorders. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2018.8

Dion GL, Tohen M, Anthony WA, Waternaux CS. Symptoms and functioning of patients with bipolar disorder six months after hospitalization. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988;39(6):652-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.39.6.652

Bonnín CDM, Reinares M, Martínez-Arán A, Jiménez E, Sánchez-Moreno J, Solé B, et al. Improving functioning, quality of life, and well-being in patients with bipolar disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;22(8):467-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyz018

Yildiz M. Psychosocial rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Noro Psikiyatri Ars. 2021;58(Suppl 1):S77-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.27430

Reinares M, Sánchez-Moreno J, Fountoulakis KN. Psychosocial interventions in bipolar disorder: what, for whom, and when. J Affect Disord. 2014;156:46-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.017

Chiang KJ, Tsai JC, Liu D, Lin CH, Chiu HL, Chou KR. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy in patients with bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176849

Levenson JC, Wallace ML, Anderson BP, Kupfer DJ, Frank E. Social rhythm disrupting events increase the risk of recurrence among individuals with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2015;17(8):869-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12351

Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1993;16(4):11-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095655

Miklowitz DJ, Johnson SL. The psychopathology and treatment of bipolar disorder. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:199-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095332

Steardo L Jr, Luciano M, Sampogna G, Zinno F, Saviano P, Staltari F, et al. Efficacy of the interpersonal and social rhythm therapy (IPSRT) in patients with bipolar disorder: results from a real-world, controlled trial. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2020;19:15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-020-00266-7

Rosa AR, Reinares M, Franco C, Comes M, Torrent C, Sánchez-Moreno J, et al. Clinical predictors of functional outcome of bipolar patients in remission. Bipolar Disord. 2009;11(4):401-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00698.x

Rabelo JL, Cruz BF, Ferreira JDR, Viana BM, Barbosa IG. Psychoeducation in bipolar disorder: a systematic review. World J Psychiatry. 2021;11(12):1407-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i12.1407

Morriss R, Lobban F, Riste L, Davies L, Holland F, Long R, et al. Clinical effectiveness and acceptability of structured group psychoeducation versus optimised unstructured peer support for patients with remitted bipolar disorder (PARADES): a pragmatic, multicentre, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(11):1029-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30302-9

Fountoulakis KN, Grunze H, Vieta E, Young A, Yatham L, Blier P, et al. The International College of Neuro-Psychopharmacology (CINP) treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder in adults (CINP-BD-2017), part 3: the clinical guidelines. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;20(2):180-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyw109

Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;133:429-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.133.5.429

Kongsakon R, Bhatanaprabhabhan D. Validity and reliability of the young mania rating scale: Thai version. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(11):1598-604.

Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134(4):382-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.134.4.382

Satthapisit S, Posayaanuwat N, Sasaluksananont C, Kaewpornsawan T, Singhakun S. The comparison of Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS Thai) to diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) and to Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD): validity and reliability. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(3):524-31.

Suratavamit S. Selected factors related to functioning of patients with bipolar disorder [Master's thesis]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 2010.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

1.
Viroon S. The effects of a psychosocial rehabilitation program on functioning in individuals with bipolar disorder. J Ment Health Thai [internet]. 2026 Aug. 30 [cited 2026 Sep. 7];34(3):188-99. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmht/article/view/287005

Issue

Section

Original article