Perceived risk of medical conditions that lead to traffic accidents and opinion on current medical examinations for driver's licenses
Main Article Content
Abstract
Road accidents remain a major public health issue in Thailand. Medical conditions can impair driving ability and increase accident risk. However, public awareness of these risks and attitudes toward the current system of medical examinations for licensing are not well understood. Protection Motivation Theory posits that risk perceptions motivate adoption of protective behaviors. This study examined public perceptions of accident risk from medical conditions and opinions on the medical examination process. An online survey was conducted with 410 residents of Bangkok aged 18+ years old. The questionnaire assessed perceived vulnerability and severity for accidents caused by 11 categories of medical conditions, as well as opinions on increasing medical examinations and discontinuing certain screening tests. Respondents perceived a high to very high risk of accidents from vision problems, seizures/epilepsy, sleep disorders, medication side effects, and heart disease. Risk perception was lower for diabetes, older drivers, hearing impairment, and musculoskeletal conditions. Personal vehicle drivers perceived higher risk than passengers. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed with increasing medical examinations for licensing. Most respondents disagreed with eliminating screenings for colorblindness, tuberculosis, leprosy and elephantiasis. Factors associated with higher severity perception included income, education level, driving experience, and accident history. The findings align with evidence that neurological, cardiovascular and visual disorders substantially impact driving ability. However, chronic conditions were perceived as lower risk. Drivers appropriately recognized their increased risk compared to passengers. The desire to maintain tests for colorblindness and infectious diseases indicates some misconceptions about their relevance. This study found that the Thai public perceived a high risk of accidents from medical conditions known to impair driving, but had lower risk perception for some chronic conditions. Respondents strongly supported increasing the use of medical examinations for licensing, but opposed removing tests of uncertain relevance. Policymakers should use these findings along with medical evidence to develop licensing criteria that are effective, fair and acceptable.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่พิมพ์ในวารสารสถาบันป้องกันควบคุมโรคเขตเมือง ถือว่าเป็นผลงานวิชาการ งานวิจัยและวิเคราะห์ ตลอดจนเป็นความเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนเอง ไม่ใช่ความเห็นของสถาบันป้องกันควบคุมโรคเขตเมือง หรือคณะบรรณาธิการแต่ประการใด ผู้เขียนจำต้องรับผิดชอบต่อบทความของตน
References
World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
กรมควบคุมโรค, กองป้องกันการบาดเจ็บ. สถานการณ์อุบัติเหตุทางถนนของประเทศไทย.นนทบุรี: กรมควบคุมโรค; 2564.
Charlton J, Koppel S, Odell M, Devlin A, Langford J, O'Hare M, et al. Influence of chronic illness on crash involvement of motor vehicle drivers. 2nd ed. Clayton: Monash University Accident Research Center (MUARC); 2010.
Vaa T. Impairments, diseases, age and their relative risks of accident involvement: Results from meta-analysis. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics; 2003.
Tervo TM, Neira W, Kivioja A, Sulander P, Parkkari K, Holopainen JM. Observational failures/distraction and disease attack/incapacity as cause(s) of fatal road crashes in Finland. Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9(3):211-6.
Lindsay VL, Baldock MRJ. Medical conditions as a contributing factor in crash causation. ln: Anderson R editor. Crash causation. Proceedings of the 2008 Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference; 2008 Nov 9-12; University of Adelaide. Adelaide: University of Adelaide; 2008. p.610-628.
Rogers RW. A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114.
Ryan M, Walshe J, Booth R, O'Neill DJ. Perceptions and attitudes toward risk and personal responsibility in the context of medical fitness to drive. Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(6):365-70.
Alonso F, Esteban C, Useche SA, Serge A. Perception of the impact of certain health conditions on driving performance. Public Health International. 2017;2(1):1-7.
Cox DJ, Penberthy JK, Zrebiec J, Weinger K, Aikens JE, Frier B, et al. Diabetes and driving mishaps: frequency and correlations from a multinational survey. Diabetes Care. 2003 Aug;26(8):2329-34.
Cheung I, McCartt AT. Declines in fatal crashes of older drivers: changes in crash risk and survivability. Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):666-74.
Lombardi DA, Horrey WJ, Courtney TK. Age-related differences in fatal intersection crashes in the United States. Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):20-9.
Ngueutsa R, Kouabenan DR. Accident history, risk perception and traffic safe behaviour. Ergonomics. 2017 Sep;60(9):1273-82.
Eby DW, Molnar LJ, Pellerito JM Jr. Driving cessation and alternative community mobility. Driver Rehabilitation and Community Mobility .2006;9:425-54.
Freund B, Petrakos D. Continued driving and time to transition to nondriver status through error-specific driving restrictions. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2008;29(4):326-35.