Efficacy of telling blood test with a trend graph to decrease levels of HbA1c and direct LDL in diabetes patients
Main Article Content
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled diabetes is a significant contributor to high annual mortality rates. In Thailand, physicians typically inform patients of their HbA1c and direct LDL levels through verbal communication. However, a review of the literature found no clinical trials comparing the effectiveness of traditional verbal communication and trend graph communication in reducing HbA1c and direct LDL levels among patients with diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of traditional verbal communication versus trend graph communication in conveying blood test results for reducing HbA1c and direct LDL levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at subdistrict health promoting hospital in Chiang Rai were randomized in an open-label design into two groups: a control group that received blood test results through traditional verbal communication and an intervention groupthat received blood test results through trend graph communication. Each group will receive treatment and be provided with their blood test results twice: on the first day of study enrollment and at the 3-month follow-up. HbA1c and direct LDL levels will be monitored at 3 and 6 months after the study begins. The efficacy will be compared within and between groups using the mean differences in blood test results from 0 to 3 months and from 0 to 6 months, analyzed with paired t-test and independent t-test.
RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included, and 98 patients met the criteria. The baseline characteristics, including initial HbA1c and direct LDL levels, were not statistically different between the two groups. At the end of 6 months, the mean differences in the reduction of HbA1cand direct LDL between the trend graph communication group and the traditional verbal communication group were not statistically significant [HbA1c: mean difference -0.04 (95% CI -0.25 to 0.16), p=0.661; direct LDL: mean difference 4.33 (95% CI -4.76 to 13.41), p=0.347]. However, within the trend graph communication group, HbA1clevels showed a statistically significant reduction from baseline [mean change -0.14 (95% CI -0.25 to -0.04), p=0.010].
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Both groups were able to reduce HbA1c and direct LDL levels over 6 months, with no significant difference in efficacy. However, trend graph communication demonstrated a slightly greater reduction in HbA1clevels. This approach may serve as an additional tool to support patients with type 2 diabetes in better managing their HbA1c and direct LDL levels.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes around the world in 2021 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 2]. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org.
Chonburi Department of Disease Control 6 invites you to be aware and adjust behavior to prevent diabetes [internet]. Nonthaburi: Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health; 2022 [November 15; cited 2025 Jun 2]. Available from: https://ddc.moph.go.th/odpc6/news.php?news=29639&deptcode=odpc6.
World Health Organization. Diabetes [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jun 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes.
Yoong SL, Carey ML, Sanson-Fisher RW, D'Este C. A cross-sectional study assessing the self-reported weight loss strategies used by adult Australian general practice patients. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:48.
Post RE, Mainous AG 3rd, Gregorie SH, Knoll ME, Diaz VA, Saxena SK. The influence of physician acknowledgment of patients’ weight status on patient perceptions of overweight and obesity in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Feb 28;171(4):316-21.
Charles J, Britt H, Knox S. Patient perception of their weight, attempts to lose weight and their diabetes status. Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35(11):925-8.
Bilondi SS, Noghabi AD, Aalami H. The relationship between illness perception and medication adherence in patients with diabetes mellitus type II: illness perception and medication adherence. J Prev Med Hyg. 2022;62(4):E966-E71.
Kartal A, İnci FH. A cross-sectional survey of self-perceived health status and metabolic control values in patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Feb;48(2):227-34.
Sony K. Assessment of group. versus individual diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) in type 2 diabetes patients at primary care unit and diabetes clinic, Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital. ChiangRai Med J. 2017;9(2):19–28.
Eknithiset R, Somrongthong R. Effectiveness of a diabetes mellitus pictorial diary handbook program for middle-aged and elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a quasi-experimental study at Taladnoi Primary Care Unit, Saraburi, Thailand. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:327–34.
Gopalan A, Suttner L, Troxel AB, McDonough K, Schapira MM. Testing patient-informed approaches for visually depicting the hemoglobin A1c value to patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):178.
Wongkanarattanakul P. Effectiveness of fasting blood sugar chart record to control clood sugar level in diabetic patients. Region 7 Med J. 2018;13(4):399–407.
Molyneaux LM, Constantino MI, McGill M, Zilkens R, Yue DK. Better glycaemic control and risk reduction of diabetic complications in Type 2 diabetes: comparison with the DCCT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998;42(2):77-83.
The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1995;44(8):968–83.
Gopalan A, Tahirovic E, Moss H, Troxel AB, Zhu J, Loewenstein G, et al. Translating the hemoglobin A1C with more easily understood feedback: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(7):996-1003.
Clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2023 [Internet]. Bangkok: Diabetes Association of Thailand under The Patronage of Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn; 2023 [cited 2025 Jun 2]. Available from: https://www.dmthai.org/new/index.php/activities-and-news/news-pr/naewthang-wech-ptibati-sahrab-rokh-bea-hwan-2566-chbab-prabprung-kph-67.
Jitapunkul S, Kunanusont C, Phoolcharoen W, Suriyawongpaisal P. Prevalence estimation of dementia among Thai elderly: a national survey. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001;84(4):461-7.
Department of Mental Health of Thailand. Patient Health Questionnaire: 2Q & Q9 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 2]. Available from: https://catalog.dmh.go.th/dataset/testdepress.
Division of Non-communicable Diseases, Department of Disease Control. Nutrition principles for diabetes prevention [Internet]. YouTube; 2022 [Mar 1; cited 2025 Aug 15]. Available from: https://youtu.be/ZM7AS5-w_cE.
Gopalan A, Tahirovic E, Moss H, Troxel AB, Zhu J, Loewenstein G, et al. Translating the hemoglobin A1C with more easily understood feedback: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(7):996-1003
Wong SS, Ng CJ, Liew SM, Hussein N. Effectiveness of a colour coded HbA1c graphical record in improving diabetes control in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized control trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;95(2):e41-4.