Development and Evaluation of Promoting Tuberculosis Preventive Behaviors among Migrant Workers with Bacteriologically Confirmed Pulmonary Tuberculosis Disease and Household Contacts in Chiang Rai, Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Development and Evaluation of Promoting Tuberculosis Preventive Behaviors among Migrant Workers with Bacteriologically Confirmed Pulmonary Tuberculosis Disease and Household Contacts in Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Palita Chareonsuk, B.N.S.*, Phitsanuruk Kantathawee, Ph.D.*
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
World health organization ranks Thailand as one of 14 countries with the highest burdens of tuberculosis, tuberculosis co-infection, and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. In the northern border area which is Chiang Rai, new TB cases were found to be higher than the national level. Therefore, patients and household contacts are important populations that should be educated and monitored to prevent the spread of the infection.
OBJECTIVE
To study, develop, and evaluate preventive behaviors among bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary Tuberculosis migrant workers and household contacts in Chiang Rai.
METHODOLOGY
This study was processed in the Research and Development study design with 2 of the groups of participants including population group 83 pulmonary Tuberculosis with household contacts (total n = 360) and controlled group 45 pulmonary Tuberculosis with household contacts (total n = 180) that were gathered from “National Tuberculosis Information Program” Ministry of Public Health Thailand. Sample size was calculated through G*Power version 3.11 The instruments for the information collecting were divided into 3 parts including general information, perception by health belief model and preventive behaviors pf pulmonary disease migrant workers with bacteriologically confirmed and household contacts, the data gathered would be analyzed by descriptive statistics with the findings include frequency, percent, mean and standard deviation.
RESULTS
The study was separated into 3 phases, in the first phase, 3 parts of questionnaires were picked the process, the first group of a total of 360 participants was found to that mostly from Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital (27.2%), Burmese (61.9%), and female (52.2%). Part 2 is the evaluation in the perception by health belief model; perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits and perceived barriers, the results turned out mostly negative with the level of perception need to be improved (= 1.86, SD = 0.60) and part 3 of the instrument was the preventive behaviors of the patients and household contacts, the results turned out as the level of preventive behaviors need to be improved (= 2.39, SD = 0.67). After that control group of 180 participants were picked up to evaluate and receive health education, in the perception by health belief model the results after received health education seemed better in the fair level of perception (Before= 1.87, SD = 0.61/ After= 2.54, SD = 0.15) and for preventive behaviors were also improved into the good level of behaviors (Before= 2.33, SD = 0.68/ After= 3.74, SD = 0.44)
CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION
The average of the level of perception by health belief model of the participants before and after received health education found that after health educated, participants were totally improved with statistically significant (p-value < 0.001), for the preventive behaviors, participants also improved in this point with statistically significant (p-value < 0.001). Overall results came out at the satisfying level as the objectives set, also the study even the methods or results can be used for the benefits in the future.
KEYWORDS Pulmonary tuberculosis, Migrant workers, Household contact, Health Belief Model
Article Details
References
2. National Tuberculosis Information Program [NTIP]. Tuberculosis Cases Report. https://tbcmthailand.ddc.moph.go.th/uiform/login.aspx (accessed 5 August 2020).
3. Metchanun Nawaphan. Scoping Review for Understanding Tuberculosis Situation in Migrant Labors in Thailand. http://kb.hsri.or.th/dspace/handle/11228/4461?locale-attribute=th (accessed 8 August 2020).
4. Khuanjai Montaisong. The Factors Predicting Tuberculosis Preventive Behaviors Among The Tuberculosis Contacts In The Bangkok Area And Perimeter. J Royal Thai Army Nurses 2017; 18(2): 306-314. https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/101708
5. Khuanjai Montaisong. The Factors Predicting Tuberculosis Preventive Behaviors Among The Tuberculosis Contacts In The Bangkok Area And Perimeter. J Royal Thai Army Nurses 2017; 18(2): 306-314. https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/101708
6. Provincial Labor Office Chiang Rai. Chiang Rai Labor Statistics. https://chiangrai.mol.go.th/labor_statistics (accessed 5 August 2020).
7. Sarinee Ladasawan, Supon Sukpesn. Prevalence of Tuberculosis among Children Living with Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients. Thai Journal of Tuberculosis Chest Diseases and Critical Care 2008; 29(2): 115-123.
8. Department of Disease Control. Guidelines for Suspected Tuberculosis Outbreaks Investigation, 2nd ed. Bangkok: The War Veterans Organization of Thailand; 2013.
9.Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
10. Pongsri Pulsarp, Ratchanee Krongrawa, Pirom Leesuwan, Bunthawan, Hirunkroh. DHF Preventive Behavior Development of Village Health Volunteers by Authentic Work Participatory at Thapa District Health Promotion Hospital,Ban pong district, Ratchaburi Province. NJPH 2015; 25(2): 206-218. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tnaph/article/view/39536
11. Piromrat Kiatthanabodee, Wiroj Waiwanichkij, Jaded Deeying. Prevention and Control Behaviors on Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever of Party Health Network in Muang District, Buriram Province. Journal of Research and Development BRU 2015; 10(2): 84-91. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RDIBRU/article/view/129304/97212
12. Yada Reamrimmadun, Sirinun Kumsri. Factors Related to Health Promotion Behavior by Foreign Workers. HCU Journal 2018; 21(42): 79-91. https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HCUJOURNAL/article/download/146731/108160/
13. Nisaon Phihussot, Naphak-orn Punyapapassorn, Phatre Friestad. Health Promotion Guidelines for Alienate Workers who are allowed as a Special Case of Stay in Kingdom of Thailand. Journal of the Association of Researchers 2019; 24(3): 167-189. http://www.ar.or.th/ImageData/Magazine/20055/DL_10534.pdf?t=637358581408508581