Patterns of Medication Treatment for Migraine Headaches in Online Communities

Main Article Content

Nantinee Khongnoo
Rangsima Theptepa
Rewadee Jenraumjit
Sinwisuth Sutheechai
Jannapas Tharavichitkun

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the patterns of drug use among people with migraine headaches in online communities. Method: This cross-sectional descriptive study collected data using online survey distributed on social media for 3 months. Participants were patients with migraine headaches screened by the ID-Migraine™ questionnaire. The study collected the data on patterns of drug use for migraine headaches and compared various factors between those with no/little-mild disability (MIDAS grade I-II) and those with moderate-severe disability (MIDAS grade III-IV). Results: There were 281 participants. Most of them were female (90.0%) with the ages between 18 and 29 years (55.9%). Insomnia was the most commonly reported condition (21.7% of participants). Migraines without aura were identified in 72.2% of subjects, while 16.4% of subjects reported having chronic migraine. Subjects reported moderate to severe headaches in the past three months with a median (Q1, Q3) headache score of 7.0 (6.0, 8.0) on a 0–10 point scale. Stress was the most reported precipitating factor. Treatment pattern in the majority of subjects was self-medication without seeking care from physicians (59.4%). The most frequently used acute medication was paracetamol (54.8% of those who used acute treatment). Most of them did not use migraine preventive drugs (65.1%). Most commonly used preventive medication was tricyclic antidepressants (25.5% of those using preventive medication). Patients took preventive medication only when symptoms were presented. Those with moderate-severe disability had more headache scores and amount of medications than those with no/little-mild disability. Conclusion: The majorities of migraine patients in online communities managed their symptoms by self-medication. Inappropriate uses of acute and preventive treatment of migraine headache were found. Healthcare professionals should provide patient education on how to utilize migraine medication effectively and safely.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Stovner LJ, Nichols E, Steiner TJ, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Al-Raddadi RM, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 954-76.

Ge R, Chang J. Disease burden of migraine and tension-type headache in non-high-income East and Southeast Asia from 1990 to 2019. J Headache Pain 2023; 24: 32.

Lipton RB, Silberstein SD. Episodic and chronic migraine headache: breaking down barriers to optimal treatment and prevention. Headache 2015; 55 Suppl 2: 103-26.

Manack AN, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Chronic migraine: epidemiology and disease burden. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2011; 15: 70-8.

Xu J, Kong F, Buse DC. Predictors of episodic migraine transformation to chronic migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies. Cephalalgia 2019; 40: 503-16.

Kulkantrakorn K. Chronic migraine. Thai Journal of Neurology 2016; 32: 34-7.

Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, Becker WJ, Buse DC, Varon SF, Maglinte GA, et al. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second international burden of migraine study (IBMS-II). Headache 2013; 53: 644-55.

Martelletti P, Schwedt TJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Quintana R, Carboni V, Diener HC, et al. My Migraine Voice survey: a global study of disease burden among individuals with migraine for whom preventive treatments have failed. J Headache Pain 2018; 19: 115.

Lipton RB, Dodick D, Sadovsky R, Kolodner K, Endicott J, Hettiarachchi J, et al. A self-administered screener for migraine in primary care: The ID Migraine validation study. Neurology 2003; 61: 375-82.

Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007; 68: 343-9.

Vongvaivanich K, Yongprawat T, Jindawong N, Chansakul C. Test-retest reliability of the Thai migraine disability assessment (Thai-MIDAS) questionnaire in Thai migraine patients. Bangkok Medical Journal 2018; 14: 10-5.

Thai Headache Society. Thai clinical practice guide- line of migraine. Bangkok: Tana press; 2022.

Dixon SJ. Distribution of Facebook users worldwide as of January 2023, by age and gender 2023 [cited Aug 29, 2023]. Available from: www.statista.com/ statistics/376128/facebook-global-user-age-distribu tion/.

Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ. Global epidemiology of migraine and its implications for public health and health policy. Nat Rev Neurol 2023; 19: 109-17.

Eikermann-Haerter K, Dileköz E, Kudo C, Savitz SI, Waeber C, Baum MJ, et al. Genetic and hormonal factors modulate spreading depression and transient hemiparesis in mouse models of familial hemiplegic migraine type 1. J Clin Invest 2009; 119: 99-109.

Labastida-Ramírez A, Rubio-Beltrán E, Villalón CM, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Gender aspects of CGRP in migraine. Cephalalgia 2019; 39: 435-44.

Buse DC, Loder EW, Gorman JA, Stewart WF, Reed ML, Fanning KM, et al. Sex differences in the prevalence, symptoms, and associated features of migraine, probable migraine and other severe headache: results of the American Migraine Preva- lence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache 2013; 53: 1278-99.

Tiseo C, Vacca A, Felbush A, Filimonova T, Gai A, Glazyrina T, et al. Migraine and sleep disorders: a systematic review. J Headache Pain 2020; 21: 126.

Yeh WZ, Blizzard L, Taylor BV. What is the actual prevalence of migraine? Brain Behav 2018; 8: e00950.

Kelman L. Pain characteristics of the acute migraine attack. Headache 2006; 46: 942-53.

Kelman L. The triggers or precipitants of the acute migraine attack. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 394-402.

Pringsheim T, Davenport WJ, Marmura MJ,Schwedt TJ, Silberstein S. How to apply the AHS evidence assessment of the acute treatment of migraine in adults to your patient with migraine. Headache 2016; 56: 1194-200.

May A, Schulte LH. Chronic migraine: risk factors, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 2016; 12: 455-64.

Serrano D, Buse DC, Manack Adams A, Reed ML, Lipton RB. Acute treatment optimization in episodic and chronic migraine: results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache 2015; 55: 502-18.

Bernstein C, Burstein R. Sensitization of the trige- minovascular pathway: perspective and implications to migraine pathophysiology. J Clin Neurol 2012; 8: 89-99.

Buse DC, Manack AN, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Turkel CC, et al. Chronic migraine prevalence, disability, and sociodemographic factors : results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study. Headache 2012; 52: 1456-70.

Suthisisang C, Poolsup N, Kittikulsuth W, Pudcha kan P, Wiwatpanich P. Efficacy of low-dose ibuprofen in acute migraine treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41: 1782-91.

Harrell TK, Minor DS. Headache Disorders. In: DiPiro JT, Yee GC, Posey LM, Haines ST, Nolin TD, Ellingrod V, editors. Pharmacotherapy: A pathophy- sio logic approach. 11th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2020. p. 989-1005.

Chia V, Bogdanov A, Yusuf A, Kallenbach L. Characteristics of migraine patients with Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores in real-world clinical practice. Cephalalgia Rep 2020; 3: 25158163 2092846.

Li XY, Yang CH, Lv JJ, Liu H, Zhang LY, Yin MY, et al. Global, regional, and national epidemiology of migraine and tension-type headache in youths and young adults aged 15-39 years from 1990 to 2019: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. J Headache Pain 2023; 24: 126.

Kim BK, Chu MK, Lee TG, Kim JM, Chung CS, Lee KS. Prevalence and impact of migraine and tension-type headache in Korea. J Clin Neurol 2012; 8: 204-11.