Development and Validation of Thai Hand Function Assessment Questionnaire Using the Rasch Model

Main Article Content

สุภารัตน์ สุขโท
แสวง วัชระธนกิจ

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate the Thai Hand Function Assessment Questionnaire. Methods: The first draft of the Thai Hand Function Assessment Questionnaire was developed based upon Thai and foreign questionnaires and from an interview with physical therapists and occupational therapists. Its face validity was assessed by 3 experts’ opinion. Index of item-objective congruence ranged 0.67-1.00. The final version of the Thai Hand Function Assessment Questionnaire comprised 33 items with a 5-point scale. It was administered in to 180 patients in the physical therapy departments of 10 hospitals. Data were analyzed by the Rasch model. Results: The questionnaire showed unidimensionality from the variance explained by measures (54.96%) and the variance of residuals in the first contrast (3.61%) was greater than 40% and less than 15% respectively. All items displayed local independence. Person reliability and person separation index were 0.93 and 3.59 whereas item reliability and item separation were 0.95 and 4.29 respectively, which were regarded as acceptable. Test of item fit statistics revealed that 33 items had optimal infit mean-squares and outfit mean-squares ranging between 0.50-1.50 except for item 18 that outfit mean-squares was 1.53. After combining 5 response categories to 3 categories and excluding 29 mis-fitted persons from the Rasch model, the test of item fit statistics found that all 33 items had acceptable infit mean-squares and outfit mean-squares. Item difficulty was not well distributed when compared with the distribution of ability of subjects’ hand function. Some groups of subjects had their hand function ability lower than the easiest item while others had their hand function ability higher than the most difficult item. Item difficulty ranged between -1.19 to 1.55 logits while ability of hand function ranged between -6.62 to 5.12 logits. Conclusion: The Thai Hand Function Assessment Questionnaire has unidimensionality and local independence with high validity and reliability. However, further studies should include additional items with more difficult and easier items to capture all hand function levels of the subjects.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

1. Gabel CP, Michener LA, Burkett B, Neller, A. The Upper Limb Functional Index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsive- ness. J Hand Ther 2006; 19: 328-48.

2. Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R. Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13 : 2-13.

3. Phongamwong C, Choosakde A. Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (Thai SPADI). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13: 2-4.

4. Prior Y, Tennant A, Tyson S, Kjeken L, Hammond A. Measure of activity performance of the hand (MAP-Hand) questionnaire: linguistic validation, cultural adaptation and psychometric testing in people with rheumatoid arthritis in the UK. BMC Musculoske letal Disorders 2018; 19: 1-12.

5. Rosales RS, Hidalgo YM, Morales LR, Atroshi I. Reliability and construct validity of the Spanish version of the 6-item CTS symptoms scale for outcomes assessment in carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disorder 2016; 17: 2-4.

6. John M, Angst F, Awiszus F, Pap G, MacDermid JC, Simmen BR. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE): cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008; 26: 1047-58.

7. Beirer M, Serly J, Vester H, Pförringer D, Crönlein M, Deiler S, et al. The Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ)–development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for wrist disorders. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17: 1-8.

8. Rapipong J. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Thai version [online]. 2006 [cited May 13, 2019]. Available from: www.dash.iwh.on.ca/site s/dash/public/ translations/DASH_Thai.pdf.

9. Upatham S, Kumnerddee W. Reliability of Thai Ver sion Boston Questionnaire. J Med Assoc Thai 2008 ; 8: 1250-6.

10. Guntayoung C, Chinchai S. The content validity and test-retest reliability of the developmental visual perception test (DTVP-2) in Thai children. Int J Med Pharm Sci 2013; 3: 1-6.

11. Meijer RR, Sijtsma K. Methodology review: Evaluating person fit. Appl Psychol Meas 2001; 25: 107-35.

12. DeMars C. Measuring higher education outcomes with a multidimensional Rasch model. J Appl Meas 2004; 5: 350-61.

13. Linacre JM. Misfit diagnosis: Infit outfit mean-square standardized [online]. 2012 (cited May 7, 2019). Available from: www.winsteps.com/winman/diagno singmisfit.htm.

14. Linacre JM. Reliability and separation of measures [online]. 1999 [cited May 7, 2019]. Available from: www.winsteps.com/winman/reliability.htm.

15. Smith EV. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 2002; 3: 205-31.

16. Linacre JM. Data variance explained by Rasch measures. Rasch Measurement Transactions 2006 ; 20: 1045.

17. Embetson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: New Jersey, L. Erlbaum Associates, 2000.

18. Wang Z, Zhou J, Luo X, Xu Y, She X, Chen L, et al. Rasch analysis of the Adult Strabismus Quality of Life Questionnaire (AS-20) among Chinese adult patients with strabismus. PLOS ONE 2015; 10: e0142188. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142188.

19. Bond T, Fox C. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007