A Comparative Retrospective Study to Identify the Smallest Primary Cementless Femoral Prosthesis Available in Thailand Using Digital Templating Method

Main Article Content

Rukthanin Ruktrakul
Charun Sirimongkol

Abstract

Background: Cementless femoral stems are commonly used in hip arthroplasty; however, caution is advised for patients with narrow femoral canals. Currently, there is no published study on the smallest cementless stem available in Thailand, and such information would be valuable for preoperative planning.
Objective: To identify the smallest cementless stem that can be implanted in Thai patients with narrow femoral canals, particularly in those with Dorr type A femurs.
Material and methods: A comparative analytic study was conducted on patients who underwent hip arthroplasty using the smallest size (size 1) Avenir cementless stem at Lampang Hospital between January 2015 and March 2023. Preoperative radiographs of the normal contralateral hip were calibrated and magnification adjusted. Digital templating was then performed using 10 different stem templates, and the optimal stem size was recorded. The percentage of patients in whom the fourth smallest stem size, or the third and fourth smallest sizes could be inserted was compared among the 10 stem types using the exact probability test.
Results: The study included hip radiographs from 71 patients, with a mean age of 60.1 ± 10.8 years (range 25–89), of whom 54 (76.1%) were female. Femoral morphology was classified as Dorr type A in 45 cases (63.4%) and type B in 26 cases (36.6%). The Accolade II stem could be inserted as the fourth smallest size in 57 cases (80.3%), a rate significantly higher than that of other stems (p<0.001). No significant differences were found among the Tri-Lock, Synergy, M/L taper, and Polar stems (p>0.05). The third and fourth smallest sizes could be inserted in all cases (100%) using the Accolade II stem and in 69 cases (97.2%) with the Polar stem (p=0.496), both demonstrating significantly higher insertion capabilities than other stems (p<0.05). The Tri-Lock stem could be inserted in 58 cases (81.7%), which was not significantly different from the Synergy stem (56 cases, 78.9%, p=0.833) but was significantly higher than the M/L taper stem (34 cases, 47.9%, p<0.001). Analysis of the 45 patients with Dorr type A femurs yielded similar results.
Conclusion: The Accolade II stem is the smallest cementless stem available in Thailand, followed by the Polar stem. The Tri-Lock and Synergy stems ranked third and were considered equally comparable.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ruktrakul , R., & Sirimongkol, C. (2025). A Comparative Retrospective Study to Identify the Smallest Primary Cementless Femoral Prosthesis Available in Thailand Using Digital Templating Method. Lampang Medical Journal, 45(2), 66–78. retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LMJ/article/view/275176
Section
Original Article

References

Elmenshawy AF, Salem KH. Cemented versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly. EFORT Open Reviews. 2021;6(5): 380−6.

Mahaisavariya B, Sitthiseripratip K, Tongdee T, Bohez EL,Vander Sloten J, Oris P. Morphological study of theproximal femur: a new method of geometricalassessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. Med Eng Phys. 2002;24(9):617−22.

Miettinen SS, Mäkinen TJ, Kostensalo I, Mäkelä K, Huhtala H, Kettunen JS, et al. Risk factors for intraoperative calcar fracture in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(2):113−9.

Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14(3):231−42.

Kheir MM, Drayer NJ, Chen AF. An update on cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(18):1646−61.

Pongkunakorn A, Aksornthung C, Sritumpinit N. Accuracy of a new digital templating method for total hip arthroplasty using picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and iPhone

technology: comparison with acetate templating on digital radiography. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(6):2204−10.

Pongkunakorn A, Udomluck P, Aksornthung C, Wangjiraphan N. Digital templating of THA using PACS and an iPhone or iPad is as accurate as commercial digital templating software. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023;481(6):1104−13.

Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample size calculations in clinical research. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2008.

Faizan A, Wuestemann T, Nevelos J, Bastian AC, Collopy D. Development and verification of a cementless novel tapered wedge stem for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(2):235−40.

Bahk JH , Han SB, Rhyu KH, Yoo JJ, Lim SJ, Park KK, et al. Identification of essential features in developing a novel femoral stem reflecting anatomical features of East Asian population:

a morphological study. J. Clin Med. 2024;13:6030.

Willburger RE, Heukamp M, Lindenlaub P, Efe T, Peterlein CD, Schüttler KF. Excellent midterm survival and functional outcomes of a fully hydroxyapatite-coated cementless stem: first

resultsof a prospective multicenter study. ArthroplastToday. 2020;6(2):201−5.

Tatani I, Solou K, Panagopoulos A, Lakoumentas J, Kouzelis A, Megas P. Short-term clinical and radiological results of two different design metaphyseal fitting femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):316.

Guo J, Tan J, Peng L, Song Q, Kong HR, Wang P, et al. Comparison of Tri-Lock bone preservation stem and the conventional standard Corail stem inprimary yotal hip arthroplasty. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(3):749−57.

Kato S, Nozawa M, Kim S, Sakamoto Y, Ochi H, Ishijima M. Comparison of the 5-year outcomes between standard and short fit-and-fill stems in Japanese populations. Arthroplast Today.

;15:108−14.

Li J, Zhang M, Yao J, Shao L, Fang C, Cheng CK. Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fractures after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(10):2547−54.

García-Cimbrelo E, Bru-Pomer A, García-Benítez B, Hernández-Blanco M, Vaquero J. Multicentric and prospective study of the Summit cementless stem. Hip Int. 2010;20 Suppl 7:S63−9.

Piggott RP, Lyons R, Murphy CG, Curtin W. Total hip replacement revision in a single brand small cementless stem - our experience after the findings of the National Joint Registry. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018;6(6):501−7.

Thiesen DM, Ntalos D, Korthaus A, Petersik A, Frosch KH, Hartel MJ. A comparison between Asians and Caucasians in the dimensions of the femoral isthmus based on a 3D-CT analysis of 1189 adult femurs. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(3):2379−86.