(Original Article) Evaluating Classroom Engagement and Learning Outcomes from Student Co-Designed and Co-Taught Learning Activities in a Health Informatics Course
Keywords:
Self-directed learning, Student engagement, Student co-designed learning, 21st-century skillsAbstract
This study explored a learner co-design and co-taught model for the volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA) era. The spectrum of learning has been increasingly shaped by advances in artificial intelligence (AI). Its rapid progress underscores the need to move beyond lecture-centric, teacher-designed instruction toward approaches that strengthen students’ self-directed learning, analytical thinking, and application of knowledge in real-world contexts. A total 96 participants, the fourth-year medical technology students of Mahidol University, was divided into three groups to engage the designed theme of study; “Health Data Management Using Database Systems”. The three consecutive groups collaboratively identified essential content and required knowledge, designed teaching methods and learning media, implemented the activities in line with defined learning outcomes, and evaluated results using questionnaires and focus-group discussion. These findings demonstrated that students engaged actively in the learning process and prioritized attaining deep conceptual understanding before communicating content to others. The designed approach fostered analytical thinking, creativity, communication, collaboration, and responsibility for one’s own learning, while cultivating a classroom climate conducive to inquiry, idea sharing, and collegial peer-to-peer learning. Despite limitations related to the scope of content and teaching skills, the overall evidence indicated that learner co-designed and co-taught approaches effectively cultivate essential 21st-century skills and align well with learner-centered pedagogy in contemporary higher education.
References
Taskan B, Junça A, Caetano A. Clarifying the conceptual map of VUCA: a systematic review. IJOA 2022; 7: 196-217.
Wang S, Wang F, Zhu Z, Wang J, Tran T, Du Z. Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Syst Appl 2024; 252: 124167.
Jin SH, Im K, Yoo M, Roll I, Seo K. Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 2023; 20, 37.
Zhang X, Zhang B, Zhang F. Student-centered case-based teaching and online-offline case discussion in postgraduate courses of computer science. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 2023; 20: 1.
Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ. Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychol Sch 2008; 45: 369-86.
Downing VR, Cooper KM, Cala JM, et al. Fear of negative evaluation and student anxiety in community college active-learning science courses. CBE Life Sci Educ 2020; 19: ar20.
Matthews KE, Dwyer A, Hine L, Turner J. Conceptions of students as partners. High Educ 2018; 76: 957-71.
Fernando S, Marikar F. Constructivist teaching/learning theory and participatory teaching methods. JCT 2017; 6: 110.
Geurts E, Reijs R, Leenders H, et al. Co-creation and decision-making with students about teaching and learning: a systematic literature review. J Educ Chang 2023; 25: 1-23.
Ambrosetti É, Gaudin C, Flandin S, et al. Students as co-designers in health professional education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ 2025; 25: 645.
Ahlfeldt S, Mehta S, Sellnow T. Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. High Educ Res Dev 2005; 24: 5-20.
Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1984.
Ryan R, Deci E. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000; 55: 68-78.
Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res 2004; 74: 59-109.
Bovill C, Cook-Sather A, Felten P. Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. Int J Acad Dev 2011; 16: 133-45.
Maulimora V. English Pre-service teachers perception of anxiety in peer teaching: A case study at universitas Kristen Indonesia. JET 2019; 5: 144-56.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Medical Technologist Association of Thailand

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.