(Research Article) Development of Rational Laboratory Use Model for Quality Service Improvement of Ta Phraya Hospital, Sa Kaeo Province

Authors

  • Kornmaneethana Punnasirimangmee Medical Technology and Radiology Department, Ta Phraya Hospital, Sa Kaeo Province, Thailand

Keywords:

Process Model Development, Quality Improvement, Rational Laboratory Use (RLU)

Abstract

Clinical laboratory testing is a fundamental process of health service systems. However, repeatability of test orders without proper clinical indications remains a significant challenge, affecting cost of treatments, personnel workload, and efficacy of patient care. Ta Phraya Hospital, Sa Kaeo Province, has encountered this challenge across multiple laboratory test items. Although the Rational Laboratory Use (RLU) policy has been established, a systematic quality improvement process model suited to the community hospital context remains unclear. This study aimed to develop a process model supporting quality improvement activities based on the RLU approach at Ta Phraya Hospital, Sa Kaeo Province, using action research methodology following the P-A-O-R cycle of Kemmis and McTaggart model. The study was conducted between June and October 2025. Twenty medical personnel were purposively selected to participated the study. Research tools included a questionnaire, in-depth interview guide, observation form, and satisfaction assessment form, all validated by experts. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected and further analyzed. The developed model consisted of seven steps: establishment of the RLU committee, policy announcement, development of test ordering guidelines, implementation of an information technology (IT)-based pop-up alert system, personnel training, monitoring and evaluation, and lesson learned. Key outcomes included a reduction in duplicate HbA1c test orders within 90 days from 28.9% to 19.7%, a decrease in orders lacking of clinical indications from 35.5% to 23.1%, a reduction in average costs per test from 145.8 to 112.4 THB, and a high level of staff satisfaction with the pop-up system (mean = 4.67 out of 5), with statistical significance (p < 0.05). The developed RLU model effectively reduced unnecessary laboratory testing, improved resource efficiency, and fostered interprofessional collaboration. This demonstrates potential RLU prototype that can be scalable applied to community hospitals, in accordance with the Smart Health System policy.

References

Peter P, William M, Antonin J, et al. International federation of clinical chemistry: A strategy to promote the rational use of laboratory tests. Clin Chim Acta 1996; 244: 121-7.

Raghad M, Alaa A, Mowafa H, et al. The impact of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on physicians: a scoping review. Stud Health Technol Inform 2020; 272: 470-3. doi:10.3233/SHTI200597.

World Health Organization. Rational use of laboratory tests. Geneva: WHO Press; 2020.

Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health. Guidelines for Rational Laboratory Use (RLU). Version_29 November 2023 [Internet]. Nonthaburi: Department of Medical Sciences; 2023 [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www3.dmsc.moph.go.th/page-view/108.

Winkens R, Dinant GJ. Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: rational, cost effective use of investigations in clinical practice. BMJ 2002; 324: 783-5.

Mindemark M, Wernroth L, Larsson A. Costly regional variations in primary health care test utilization in Sweden. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2010; 70: 164-70.

Akdeniz M, Gur T. Rational use of laboratory tests. J Gerontol Geriatr Med [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.heraldopenaccess.us/openaccess/rational-use-of-laboratory-tests.

Zhi M, Ding EL, Theisen-Toupal J, et al. The landscape of inappropriate laboratory testing: a 15-year meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e78962.

Wertheim BM, Aguirre AJ, Bhattacharyya RP, et al. An educational and administrative intervention to promote rational laboratory test utilization. Am J Med 2017; 130: 47-53.

Pannall PR, Marshall WJ, Jabor A, et al. A strategy to promote the rational use of laboratory tests. Clin Chim Acta 1996; 244: 121-7.

Kemmis S, McTaggart R. The action research planner. 3rd ed. Geelong: Deakin University; 1988.

Kusolasai S. Application of Rational Laboratory Use (RLU) Guidelines to Improve the Efficiency of Laboratory Utilization in a Community Hospital: A Case Study of Chaturaphak Phiman Hospital, Roi Et Province. Internal research report. Roi Et: Chaturaphak Phiman Hospital; 2024.

Inthanives T. Effect of the Five-Step RLU System and Automatic Alert Notification on Reducing Laboratory Testing Costs: A Case Study of Lamphun Hospital. Internal research report. Lamphun: Lamphun Hospital; 2024.

Pansiri K, Suksomboon N, Thongmak M, et al. Reducing unnecessary laboratory tests in outpatient diabetes clinics using clinical decision support systems (CDSS). J Health Syst Res 2023; 17: 112-24.

Wongwises S, Nillawan P. Implementation of rational laboratory use (RLU) in community hospitals: a multi-center intervention study. Thai Med Inform J 2022; 9: 45-59.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-21

How to Cite

1.
Punnasirimangmee K. (Research Article) Development of Rational Laboratory Use Model for Quality Service Improvement of Ta Phraya Hospital, Sa Kaeo Province. วารสารเทคนิคการแพทย์ [internet]. 2026 Jul. 21 [cited 2026 Sep. 23];54(2):349-60. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmt-amtt/article/view/283844

Issue

Section

Original Articles