(Original Article) Optimizing Urine Volume for Chemical Analysis and Microscopic Examination in Pediatric Patients

Authors

  • Samang Muraka Clinical Pathology and Technology Department, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Tida Thoruksa Clinical Pathology and Technology Department, Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Urine analysis, Urine volume, Urine sediment

Abstract

The standard urine volume required for routine urinalysis is approximately 10 mL. However, in pediatric patients, especially neonates at the Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, collecting this volume can be difficult. This study aimed to determine the minimum urine volume that allows reliable results for both chemical analysis and microscopic examination. Urine specimens from 50 pediatric patients were analyzed at volumes of 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 mL and compared with the standard 10 mL. Chemical analysis of ten routine parameters showed overall agreement exceeding 80% across all reduced volumes. Specific gravity demonstrated strong correlations with the standard volume, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients (R) of 0.907, 0.950, and 0.979 for 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 mL, respectively. Microscopic examination revealed that samples of 0.5 mL and 1.0 mL showed significantly different counts of red blood cells and white blood cells compared with 10 mL (p < 0.05), with poor agreement (k = 0.042-0.056). Other sediment components—including cellular casts, squamous epithelial cells, mucus, bacteria, crystals, amorphous material, and yeast—demonstrated fair to moderate agreement (k = 0.220-0.481). In contrast, the 5.0 mL samples showed very good agreement with the standard 10 mL (k = 0.858-1.000). In conclusion, a urine volume as low as 0.5 mL is adequate for chemical urinalysis, while at least 5.0 mL is recommended for microscopic examination. When volumes below 5.0 mL have to be used, the tested volume should be clearly reported in laboratory results.

References

Ekawong P, Wiwanitkit V. Limitations of urine strip method. Chula Med J 2005; 49: 438-42.

Kaewdee N, Siripurkpong P, Sriwanitchrak P. The quality assessment of artificial urine and urine sediment slide for chemical and microscopic examinations in urinalysis. J Med Tech Assoc Thailand 2021; 49: 7603.

Roche Diagnostics Ltd. Combur Test M reagent-strip manual. Lewes, Sussex, UK.

Roche Diagnostics. Cobas U411 Operator’s Manual. Mannheim, Germany.

CLSI. Urinalysis; Approved Guideline. CLSI document GP16-A3. 3rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2009.

Gunetti M, Castiglia S, Rustichelli D, et al. Validation of analytical methods in GMP: the disposable Fast Read 102® device, an alternative practical approach for cell counting. J Transl Med 2012; 10: 112.

Ngamjarus C, Chongsuvivatwong V. n4Studies: Sample size and power calculations for android. The Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program - The Thailand Research Fund & Prince of Songkla University; 2014.

Medical Technology Council of Thailand. Standards for Urine Sediment Analysis, 2011. [Internet]. Available from: https://mtcouncil.org/download/crystal/ [cited 2025 Oct 11]

Ouima B, Kunakorn M, Khositnithikul R, Kongasa S, Phundhusuwannakul S, Songngam S.A Comparative Study of Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer Using Flow Cytometry and Digital Image-base with Manual Microscopic Examination. J Med Tech Assoc Thailand 2020; 50: 8341-56.

Delanghe J, Speeckaert M. Preanalytical requirements of urinalysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014; 24: 89-104.

Tantisaranon P, Dumkengkhachornwong K, Aiadsakun P, Hnoonual A. A comparative of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN3000-111b and iRICELL3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis.

Practical Laboratory Medicine. 2021; 24: e00203.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

1.
Muraka S, Thoruksa T. (Original Article) Optimizing Urine Volume for Chemical Analysis and Microscopic Examination in Pediatric Patients. วารสารเทคนิคการแพทย์ [internet]. 2026 Jun. 27 [cited 2026 Sep. 4];54(2):297-309. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmt-amtt/article/view/279870

Issue

Section

Original Articles