Evaluation of Hemolysis, Icterus, and Lipemia Interference Effects in Biochemical Analysis Using an Automated Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
Keywords:
Interference, Hemolysis, Icterus, Lipemia, HIL indexAbstract
Serum or plasma samples exhibiting hemolysis (H), icterus (I), or lipemia (L) are common preanalytical errors that affect the test results in clinical chemistry laboratories. Sample assessment with HIL index by spectrophotometry on an automated clinical chemistry analyzer is a reliable and commonly used method. The aim of this study is to evaluate the hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia effects in biochemical analysis using the Beckman Coulter AU5800 automated analyzer. The data, including semiquantitative and quantitative HIL indices and biochemical values, were collected from June to December 2023. The difference in biochemical values between HIL level (0) and other HIL index levels was compared. The correlation between biochemical values and the quantitative HIL index was determined, and linear regression models were generated to predict the clinically significant interference levels. Based on the HIL index data, the maximum interference level was evaluated in the present study up to level (2+). Clinically significant positive interference from hemolysis was detected for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) at hemolysis index (HI) (1+), whereas clinically significant negative interference was detected for total bilirubin (TB) at HI (2+). Moreover, AST at lipemia index (LI) (2+) showed clinically significant positive interference from lipemia. No clinically significant interference was detected for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), direct bilirubin (DB), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and magnesium up to HI (2+); cholesterol up to icterus index (II) (1+); and ALT up to LI (2+). In addition, the LDH linear regression model predicted both the hemolysis interference level and interference cutoff, even at the minimal hemolysis degree, HI level (0). Thus, the proper HIL index cutoff and interference level should be evaluated and established in the clinical laboratories to guide sample and patient’s result management for achieving patient safety.
References
Chawla R, Goswami B, Tayal D, Mallika V. Identification of the types of preanalytical errors in the clinical chemistry laboratory: 1-year study at G.B. Pant Hospital. Lab Med 2010; 41: 89-92.
Ryder K, Glick M and Glick S. Incidence and amount of turbidity, hemolysis, and icterus in serum from outpatients. Lab Med 1991; 22: 415-8.
Kroll MH, McCudden CR. Endogenous interferences in clinical laboratory tests: icteric, lipemic and turbid samples. Berlin:De Gruyter; 2012.
Marques-Garcia F. Methods for hemolysis interference study in laboratory medicine - a critical review. eJIFCC 2020; 31: 85-97.
Farrell CJ, Carter AC. Serum indices: managing assay interference. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016; 53: 527-38.
Dimeski G, Mollee P, Carter A. Effects of hyperlipidemia on plasma sodium, potassium, and chloride measurements by an indirect ion-selective electrode measuring system. Clin Chem 2006; 52: 155-6.
Glick MR, Ryder KW, Glick SJ, Woods JR. Unreliable visual estimation of the and amount of turbidity, hemolysis, and icterus in serum from patients. Clin Chem 1989; 35: 837-9.
Lippi G, Cadamuro J. Visual assessment of sample quality: quo usque tandem?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018; 56: 513-5.
Simundic AM, Nikolac N, Ivankovic V, et al. Comparison of visual vs. Automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009; 47: 1361-5.
Getahun T, Alemu A, Mulugeta F, et al. Evaluation of visual serum indices measurements and potential false result risks in routine clinical chemistry tests in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. eJIFCC 2019; 30: 276-87.
von Meyer A, Cadamuro J, Lippi G, Simundic AM. Call for more transparency in manufacturers declarations on serum indices: On behalf of the Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE), European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). Clin Chim Acta 2018; 484: 328-32.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia/ turbidity indices as indicators of interference in clinical laboratory analysis; approved guideline. C56-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012.
Lim YK, Young JC. Proposal of modified HIL-indices for determining hemolysis, icterus and lipemia interference on the Beckman Coulter AU5800 automated platform. Lab Med Online 2017; 7: 66-72.
Aslan B, Stemp J, Catomeris P, Allen L, Kerekes R, Gun-Munro J. Clinical chemistry sample interferences reporting patterns in Ontario laboratories (abstract). Clin Chem 2012; 58: A23-4.
Akbas N, Eppert B, Miller J, Schulten C, Wallace C, Turner T. Effect of hemolysis, icterus and lipemia on chemistry tests and association between the amount of interfering substances and LIH indices. Medpace Reference Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH; 2018 [cited 2024 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www.medpace.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Whitepaper-LIH.pdf
Beckman Coulter Inc. LIH setting sheet (technical document). Brea (CA): Beckman Coulter Inc, 2022 [cited 2024 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www.beckmancoulter.com/download/file/phx-BSOSR6X16604-EN_US/BSOSR6X16604?type=pdf
Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc 1964; B26: 211-52.
Horn PS, Feng L, Li Y, Pesce AJ. Effect of outliers and nonhealthy individuals on reference interval estimation. Clin Chem 2001; 47: 2137-45.
Jenkins DG, Quintana-Ascencio PF. A solution to minimum sample size for regressions. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0229345.
Aarsand AK, Fernandez-Calle P, Webster C, et al. The EFLM Biological Variation Database [cited 2024 Jan 14]. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/
Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999; 59: 491-500 [cited 2024 Feb 5]. Updated database available from: https://www.westgard.com/clia-a-quality/quality-requirements/238-biodatabase1.html
Tian G, Wu Y, Jin X, et al. The incidence rate and influence factors of hemolysis, lipemia, icterus in fasting serum biochemistry specimens. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0262748.
Perović A, Dolčić M. Influence of hemolysis on clinical chemistry parameters determined with Beckman Coulter tests - detection of clinically significant interference. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2019; 79: 154-9.
Koseoglu M, Hur A, Atay A, Cuhadar S. Effects of hemolysis interferences on routine biochemistry parameters. Biochem Med 2011; 21: 79-85.
Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Brocco G, Guidi GC. Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44:311-6.
Ho CKM, Chen C, Setoh JWS, Yap WWT, Hawkins RCW. Optimization of hemolysis, icterus and lipemia interference thresholds for 35 clinical chemistry assays.Pract Lab Med 2021; 25: e00232.
Shull B, Lees H, Li P. Mechanism of interference by hemoglobin in the determination of total bilirubin. I. Method of Malloy-Evelyn. Clin Chem 1980; 26: 22-5.
Dawson R. How significant is a boxplot outlier?. J Stat Educ 2011; 19.
Fernández-Prendes C, Castro-Castro MJ, Jiménez-Añón L, Morales-Indiano C, Martínez-Bujidos M. Discrepancies in lipemia interference between endogenous lipemic samples and Smoflipid®-supplemented samples. eJIFCC 2023; 34:27-41.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of the Medical Technologist Association of Thailand

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.