Prevalence of Multidrug Resistance of Cutibacterium acnes Isolated from Micro-comedone Specimen
Keywords:
Multidrug resistance, MDR, Cutibacterium acnes, Micro-comedonesAbstract
Cutibacterium acnes, a Gram-positive anaerobic bacterium, has long been associated with human skin as a commensal organism. However, it has been implicated in various dermatological conditions, most notably acne vulgaris. Nowadays, C. acnes is becoming resistant to various antibiotic groups. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of multidrug resistant C. acnes (MDR C. acnes) and a relationship between variable factors and prevalence of MDR C. acnes isolated from micro-comedone. C. acnes were isolated from 46 volunteers at mild and moderate stages of acne. The isolates were cultured on blood agar under anaerobic conditions and identified by using biochemical test. Antibiotic susceptibility test was conducted using antimicrobial gradient strips (the E-test method). The relationship between MDR prevalence and other variable factors was examined using the chi-square test. The results revealed that MDR C. acnes was identified in 20% of cases, with 9% showing resistance to clindamycin, erythromycin, and gentamicin, and 11% exhibiting resistance to clindamycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline. MDR C. acne was found more frequently in individuals with moderate-severity acne compared to those with mild-severity acne, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). In individuals with oily facial skin, the presence of MDR C. acne was higher than in those with other skin types (p < 0.05). Additionally, individuals who used topical antibiotics and did not adhere to the prescribed antibiotic regimen by their doctor had a higher incidence of MDR C. acne compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Therefore, in the treatment of acne with antibiotics, it is crucial to emphasize treatment adherence and provide patients with information about using antibiotics according to the prescribing doctor's recommendations. This is to reduce the development of antibiotic resistance and minimize the severity of acne.
References
iod.go.th [homepage on the Internet]. Bangkok: Out-patient Disease Statistics 2016-2018 [cited 2023 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.iod.go.th/wp-content/ uploads/2021/05/ข้อมูลด้านสถิติ.pdf
Vasam M, Korutla S, Bohara RA. Acne vulgaris: A review of the pathophysiology, treatment, and recent nanotechnology based advances. Biochem Biophys Rep 2023; 36: 101578
Gajdács M., Spengler G., Urbán E. Iden-tification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: Rubik’s cube of clinical microbiology? Antibiotics 2017; 6: 25.
Oge’LK, Broussard A, Marshall MD. Acne vulgaris: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 2019; 100: 475-84.
Leheste JR, Ruvolo KE, Chrostowski JE, et al. P. acnes-Driven Disease Pathology: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 14; 7: 81. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00081. PMID: 28352613; PMCID: PMC5348501.
Portillo ME, Corvec S, Borens O, Trampuz A. Propionibacterium acnes: an underestimated pathogen in implant-associated infections. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013: 804391. doi: 10.1155/2013/804391.
Acherman Y, Goldstein EJC, Coenye T, et al. Propionibacterium acnes: from commensal to opportunistic biofilm- associated implant pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014; 27: 419-40.
Cavallo I, Sivori F, Truglio M, et al. Skin dysbiosis and Cutibacterium acnes biofilm in inflammatory acne lesions of adolescents. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 21104.
Zaenglein AL, Pathy AL, Schlosser BJ, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74: 945-73.e33.
Eyüboglu M, Kalay I, Eyüboglu D. Evaluation of adolescents diagnosed with acne vulgaris for quality of life and psychosocial challenges. Indian J Dermatol 2018; 63: 131-5.
Schlessinger J, Menter A, Gold M, et al. Clinical safety and efficacy studies of a novel formulation combining 1.2% clindamycin phosphate and 0.025% tretinoin for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol 2007; 6: 607-15.
Koyanagi S, Koizumi J, Nakase K, et al. Increased frequency of clindamycin-resistant Cutibacterium acnes strains isolated from Japanese patients with acne vulgaris caused by the prevalence of exogenous resistance genes. J Dermatol 2023; 50: 793-99. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.16757
Zhu T, Zhu W, Wang Q, et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes isolated from patients with acne in a public hospital in Southwest China: prospective cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e022938. doi:10.1136/bmjopen- 2018-022938.
Aoki S, Nakase K, Hayashi N, et al. Increased prevalence of doxycycline low-susceptible Cutibacterium acnes isolated from acne patients in Japan caused by antimicrobial use and diversification of tetracycline resistance factors. J Dermatol 2021; 48: 1365-71. doi:10.1111/1346- 8138.15940
NakaseK,AokiS,SeiS,etal.Characteri- zation of acne patients carrying clindamycin-resistant Cutibacterium acnes: A Japanese multicenter study. J Dermatol 2020; 47: 863-9.
Zhao L, Chen J, Bai B, et al. Topical drug delivery strategies for enhancing drug effectiveness by skin barriers, drug delivery systems and individualized dosing. Front Pharmacol 2024; 14: 1333986.
Aoki S, Nakase K, Nakaminami H, Wajima T, Hayashi N, Noguchi N. Transferable multidrug-resistance plasmid carrying a novel macrolide-clindamycin resistance gene, erm(50), in Cutibacterium acnes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64: e01810-19. doi:10.1128/ AAC.01810-19
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of the Medical Technologist Association of Thailand

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.