Competency to stand trial among forensic psychiatric patients
Keywords:
competency to stand trial, forensic psychiatric patientsAbstract
Objectives This study was to examine competency to stand trial rate of forensic psychiatric in-patients after being discharged from Galya Rajanagarindra Institute, to study causes of relapse and average time for fitness to stand trial.
Materials and methods The sample was consisted of 159 forensic psychiatric in-patients who were sent by courts, police station and relatives under the section
14 of Criminal Procedure Code. They were discharged from Galya Rajanagarindra Institute during 1st October, 1999 to 30th September, 2002. The data collection was divided two phases. Firstly, the data were collected from in-patient files of Galya Rajanagarindra Institute during March to August, 2004. Secondly, they were gathered from the criminal procedure during September, 2004 to December, 2006. The data from 153 cases were analyzed by using descriptive statistics and content analysis from criminal procedure and adjudication report.
Results The results revealed that the competency to stand trial rate was 99.3%. The relapse rate during stand trial process was 22.1%. The causes of relapse were
lack of continuous treatment (63.6%), inadequate psychiatric treatment (30.3%), amphetamine or alcohol use during on bail (6.1%). Average time for fitness to
stand trial was 289 days.
Conclusion Most of forensic psychiatric patients were able to stand trial. Discontinuous and inadequate treatment were the major causes of relapse during criminal procedure. The study results will be beneficial to improve after care planning for standing to trial forensic psychiatric cases.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted. The consent does not extend to other kinds of copying, such as for general distribution, for advertising, or for resale.
- Unless otherwise states, the views and opinion expressed in Journal of Mental Health of Thailand are those of authors of the papers, and do not represent those of the editorial board or the Department of Mental Health.
