Personality traits involved in Driving Behaviors and Traffic accident
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Traffic accidents can result in significant loss of life and property. Various types of behavior and personality are important factors leading to traffic accidents. Previous research has studied and summarized the relationship between personality and the risk of traffic accidents in various ways. This academic work is an exploration and literature review with the objective of investigating the personality traits and expressions related to the occurrence of traffic accidents to the greatest extent possible. Through the review of various literature and the use of scientific instruments, it serves as an indicator of the trends in personality traits that have been reviewed for their correlation with traffic accidents. The study will employ a comprehensive literature review, statistical data, research papers, and relevant academic works. The study found that the anti-social personality group tends to be more involved in traffic accidents than the general population. Furthermore, individuals with a risk-seeking personality, which is one of the anti-social personality traits, have a specific correlation with a higher likelihood of traffic accidents. In summary, assessing individuals with anti-social personality and risk-seeking personality traits before driving can serve as a screening process to identify those at risk of traffic accidents and provide appropriate guidance on risk management for the driving public with these specific personality characteristics.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่พิมพ์ในวารสารสถาบันป้องกันควบคุมโรคเขตเมือง ถือว่าเป็นผลงานวิชาการ งานวิจัยและวิเคราะห์ ตลอดจนเป็นความเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนเอง ไม่ใช่ความเห็นของสถาบันป้องกันควบคุมโรคเขตเมือง หรือคณะบรรณาธิการแต่ประการใด ผู้เขียนจำต้องรับผิดชอบต่อบทความของตน
References
Suphanchaimat R, Sornsrivichai V, Limwattananon S, Thammawijaya P. Economic development and road traffic injuries and fatalities in Thailand: An application of spatial panel data analysis, 2012–2016. BMC public health. 2019;19:1-15.
ธนะพงศ์ จินวงษ์. อุบัติเหตุทางถนน “ภัยเงียบ” ที่ยังอันตรายและท้าทายการจัดการ. วารสารการแพทย์ฉุกเฉินแห่งประเทศไทย. 2564;1(1):71-6.
สถิติกรมทางหลวง [อินเตอร์เน็ต]. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักอำนวยความปลอดภัย กรมทางหลวง. 2566 - [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2566]. เข้าถึงได้จาก: https://bhs.doh.go.th/home
Wang Y, Qu W, Ge Y, Sun X, Zhang K. Effect of personality traits on driving style: Psychometric adaption of the multidimensional driving style inventory in a Chinese sample. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):1-17.
Aluja A, Balada F, García O, García LF. Psychological predictors of risky driving: the role of age, gender, personality traits (Zuckerman's and Gray's models), and decision-making styles. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1-14.
Lucidi F, Girelli L, Chirico A, Alivernini F, Cozzolino M, Violani C, et al. Personality Traits and Attitudes Toward Traffic Safety Predict Risky Behavior Across Young, Adult, and Older Drivers. Front Psychol. 2019;10(536):1-11.
Roberti JW. A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of research in personality. 2004;38(3):256-79.
Rahmani S, Lavasani MG. Gender differences in five factor model of personality and sensation seeking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;46:2906-11.
Gellman MD, Turner JR, editors. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 993-994.
Rosli NS, Yunus JM, Hanan SA. Influence of Agreeableness Personality Trait on Driving Behaviour among Motorists in Malaysia. RA Journal of Applied Research. 2017;3(12):1324-30.
Bortolato M, Shih JC. Behavioral outcomes of monoamine oxidase deficiency: preclinical and clinical evidence. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2011;100:13-42.
Shih JC, Thompson RF. Monoamine oxidase in neuropsychiatry and behavior. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 ;65(3):593-8.
Kolla NJ, Vinette SA. Monoamine Oxidase A in Antisocial Personality Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2017;4(1):41-48.
Malakoutikhah M, Jahangiri M, Alimohammadlou M, Faghihi SA, Kamalinia M. The Factors Affecting Unsafe Behaviors of Iranian Workers: A Qualitative Study Based on Grounded Theory. Saf Health Work. 2021;12(3):339-345.
Nasaescu E, Zych I, Ortega-Ruiz R, Farrington DP, Llorent VJ. Longitudinal patterns of antisocial behaviors in early adolescence: A latent class and latent transition analysis. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context. 2020;12(2):85-92.
Leppink EW, Chamberlain SR, Redden SA, Grant JE. Problematic sexual behavior in young adults: Associations across clinical, behavioral, and neurocognitive variables. Psychiatry Res. 2016;246:230-5.
Shackelford TK, Weekes-Shackelford VA, editors. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Cham: Spinger; 2021. p. 3858-65.
Patra P, Prakash J, Patra B, Khanna P. Intimate partner violence: Wounds are deeper. Indian J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct-Dec;60(4):494-8.
Bakhshani NM. Impulsivity: a predisposition toward risky behaviors. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2014;3(2):1-3.
Friedman HS. Encyclopedia of mental health. 2nd ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2015.
Dade P. Encyclopedia of child behavior and development. Reference Reviews; Harlow. 2011;25(6):10-11.
Zou Z, Wang H, d'Oleire Uquillas F, Wang X, Ding J, Chen H. Definition of Substance and Non-substance Addiction. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1010:21-41.
Himawan A, Suryanto, Pratitis NT. The Psychological Dynamics Underlying of Criminal Theft Accompanied by Violence. JournEEL. 2021;3(1):55-64.
Abdoli N, Farnia V, Salemi S, Tatari F, Shakeri J, Basanj B, AhmadiJuibari T, Bahrampouri S. Predictors of substance abuse among risky drivers: The role of personality characteristics and mental health. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:163.1-6.
Urieta P, Aluja A, Garcia LF, Balada F, Lacomba E. Decision-Making and the Alternative Five Factor Personality Model: Exploring the Role of Personality Traits, Age, Sex and Social Position. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1-12.
Aluja A, Lucas I, Blanch A, Lopez OG, García LF. The Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja personality questionnaire shortened form (ZKA-PQ/SF). Personality and Individual Differences 2018;134:174-81.
Berisha G, Pula JS, Krasniqi B. Convergent validity of two decision making style measures. Journal of Dynamic Decision Making. 2018;4(1):1-8.
Zuckerman M. Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An Operational Definition of the Alternative Five Factorial Model of Personality. In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Volume 2 - Personality Measurement and Testing. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2008. p. 219-222.
วรวัชร์ ตั้งจิตรเจริญ, บุรชัย อัศวทวีบุญ, ชลาลัย แต้ศิลปะสาธิต, ดำรงค์ อดุลยฤทธิกุล, พนิดา ซิมาภรณ์, สาวิตรี แฮมมอนด์, และคณะ. การพัฒนาแบบทดสอบ MMPI-2-RF ฉบับภาษาไทย: การแปลและการทดสอบแบบวัดซ้ำกับผู้ที่ชำนาญสองภาษา. วารสารสมาคมจิตแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย. 2560;62(4):349-58.
Zuckerman M, Aluja A. Measures of sensation seeking. In: Boyle GJ, Saklofske DH, Matthews G, editors. Measures of personality and social psychological constructs. London: Academic Press; 2015. p. 352-80.
Shinohara K, Renge K. Perception and cognition of drivers. In: International association of traffic and safety sciences, editor. Traffic and Safety Sciences. Tokyo: The Japan Times, Ltd.; 2015. p. 80-1.
Kaul R, Jipp M. Influence of cognitive processes on driver decision-making in dilemma zone. Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives. 2023;19:1-9.