A Comparative Study of The Association between The Waiting Time for Appendectomy and Occurrence of Appendicitis Complications

Authors

  • Pothchara Tanchvalit General surgery physician Surgical Department, Huahin Hospital

Keywords:

Appendectomy waiting time, appendicitis complications

Abstract

Background: Currently, there are research studies collecting data on delayed appendectomy compared to the group undergoing urgent surgery to study the effects of delayed surgery. The majority found no statistically significant difference. In addition, The World Journal of Emergency Surgery published the Jerusalem guidelines for appendicitis, which state that appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis within 24 hours does not differ in the occurrence of complications.  (QoE: 1B) Therefore, it is possible to study the appropriate waiting time for planning appendectomy treatment, reducing the burden of emergency surgery, and increasing treatment options for appendicitis.

Objective: To compare appendectomy outcomes at Hua Hin Hospital, dividing patients into groups based on the time after diagnosis: those who underwent surgery within 1 hour, 1-6 hours, 6-12 hours, and after 12 hours, to study the effect on the occurrence of complications.

Methods: This is a retrospective study collecting data from patients diagnosed with appendicitis at Hua Hin Hospital from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, totaling 839 cases. Descriptive statistics were used, and for continuous data, statistical tests were used, including the Chi-square test, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, Binary logistic regression, Poisson regression, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman rho correlation.

Results: The waiting time for appendectomy in the groups operated within 1 hour, 1-6 hours, and 6-12 hours showed no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of complications. However, the group operated after 12 hours had a statistically significant reduction in the chance of developing gangrenous appendicitis and ruptured appendicitis at the 0.05 level (Multivariable analysis). The effect of surgical waiting time on the occurrence of abscess and phlegmon was found to be statistically insignificant (P>0.05)

Conclusion: The waiting time for appendectomy in the groups operated within 1 hour, 1-6 hours, and 6-12 hours showed no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of complications, which is consistent with previous research.However, this study found that the group operated after 12 hours had a lower chance of developing gangrenous appendicitis and ruptured appendicitis compared to the group operating within 1 hour.

References

Fadi SD, David H, and Kiran KT. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education;2019. p. 1331-45

Mark E. Cohen, Karl Y. Bilimoria, et al. Effect of Delay to Operation on Outcomes in Adults with Acute Appendicitis. [Internet]. JAMA Surgery. 2010 Sep. [cited 2024 Dec 15];886-92. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/406271

Fadi A , Charles B, Kervin A, Young K, Jeremiah M, Randolph R, Kenneth C. Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours. [Internet]. JAMA surgery. 2006 May [cited 2024 Dec 15];504-50. Available from:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16702523

Kamal N, Navalkishor U, Niraj S, Ernesto C, John MC, Daniel TF. Delaying an Appendectomy: Is it Safe?. [Internet]. The American Surgeon Volume 78. 2012 Aug. [cited 2024 Dec 15];897-900. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000313481207800827

Sang HK, Sun JP, Youn YP, Sung IC. Delayed Appendectomy Is Safe in Patients with Acute Nonperforated Appendicitis. [Internet]. International surgery. 2015 JUN. [cited 2024 Dec 15];1004-10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587498/

Karoliina J, Ville S, Hanna L, Hanna M, Ingeborg S, Knut MA, Ari L, Panu M. Role of preoperative in-hospital delay on appendiceal perforation while awaiting appendicectomy (PERFECT): a Nordic, pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. [Internet]. The Lancet Volume 402. 2023 Sep. [cited 2024 Dec 15];1552-61. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)01311-9/abstract

Jae ML, Beom SK, Young JP. Is a One Night Delay of Surgery Safe in Patients With Acute Appendicitis?. [Internet]. Annals of Coloproctology Volume 34. 2018 Feb. [cited 2024 Dec 15];11-15. Available from: https://coloproctol.org/journal/view.php?number=1552

Jian L. Revisiting delayed appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis. [Internet]. World journal of Clinical Cases Volume 9. 2021 Jul. [cited 2024 Dec 18];5372-5390. Available from: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i20/5372.htm

Jian L, Run X, Deng-Min H, Yao Z, Tu-Ping G, Xue-Lian W, (2019, Jan 23). Effect of Delay to Operation on Outcomes in Patients with Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. [Internet]. 2019 Jan. [cited 2024 Dec 18];210-223. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29980978/

Salomone DS, Mauro P, Belinda DS, Marco C, Goran A, Alice G, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. [Internet]. World Journal of Emergency Surgery volume 15. 2020 April. [cited 2024 Dec 18];1-42. Available from: https://wjes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3

รัฐภูมิ ชามพูนท, ไชยรัตน์ เพิ่มพิกุล, บุญส่ง พัจนสุนทร, (บรรณาธิการ). แนวทางเวชปฏิบัติการดูแลรักษาผู้ป่วย Severe Sepsis และ Septic Shock พ.ศ.2558. กรุงเทพฯ: สมาคมเวชบำบัดวิกฤตแห่งประเทศไทย ; 2558. น. 51

Mervyn S, Clifford SD, Christopher WS, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). [Internet]. JAMA Network. 2016 Feb. [cited 2024 Dec 18];801-810 Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2492881

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Tanchvalit, P. . (2025). A Comparative Study of The Association between The Waiting Time for Appendectomy and Occurrence of Appendicitis Complications. Hua Hin Medical Journal, 5(1), 30–43. retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hhsk/article/view/275511

Issue

Section

Original article