OUTCOMES OF USING THE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS AT FANG HOSPITAL, CHIANGMAI PROVINCE

Main Article Content

ฑิตยา วาระนัง

Abstract

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND          


         Sepsis is status that increasing of incidence and it is the first of hospital death. The application of clinical practice guideline for sepsis by an effective multidisciplinary team can reduce the mortality rate of patients.


OBJECTIVES


         To compare clinical outcomes before and after application of clinical practice guideline and to study the operational quality of care for patients with sepsis.


METHODS


         The study was an observational study with historical control. The data of pre-guideline period collected by retrospective review of medical records during October 2016 – March 2017 were compare to those of post-guideline period collected during April 2017 – September 2017.  Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics and chi-square test, Fisher Exact test and Independent t test respectively.


RESULTS


         246 patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. 85 patients were in pre-CPG periods and 161 patients were in post-CPG periods. The mortality rate was reduced from 28.2% to 21.1% meanwhile, rate of the hemocultures test before antibiotics prescription and initial therapy within 1 hour of sepsis onset decreased from 81.2.7% to 60.2% and 44.7% to 29.2% Furthermore, rate of fluid replacement therapy within 1 hour and rate of intensive management within 3 hour decreased from 20.0% to 19.3%.


 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS  
         The CPG for sepsis is effective in reducing in-hospital mortality rate. The reciprocal decrease in process results indicates that the CPG implementation might imperfect and requires further improvement.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
วาระนัง ฑ. OUTCOMES OF USING THE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS AT FANG HOSPITAL, CHIANGMAI PROVINCE. crmj [internet]. 2019 Jun. 14 [cited 2025 Dec. 19];11(1):1-8. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/crmjournal/article/view/179719
Section
Original Articles

References

1.Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(9): 840-51.
2.Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee Including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41(2): 580-637.
3.Inspection Guideline of Public Health Fiscal Year 2018. Inspection Division Ministry of Public Health.2018; 448-459.
4.Rhodes A,LE,W,MM, Antonelli M,R6, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive care medicine. 2017; 43(3): 304-377.
5.Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW. Manu;, et al. The Third International Concensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8): 801-810.
6. Wang YA, Fang CC, Chen CS, Tsai HS. Periarrest Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) predicts
the outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest. J Formos Med Assoc. 2016; 115(2): 76-82.
7.Champunot R, Permpikul C, Patjanasoontorn B. Severe sepsis and Septic shock Guideline (draft) 2015. The Thai society of critical care medicine.
8.Thiemsuwan Y, Malahom O, Yindesuk T, Kwanchang P, Prasertsri N. The Development
Caring System of Critical Sepsis Patients by Case Management at Sunprasithtiprasong Hospital,Ubon Ratchathani. Journal of Nursing and Health Care. 2017; 35(1): 184-193.
9. Mahantassanapong C. Outcome of the Surin Sepsis Treatment Protocol in Sepsis Management. Srinagarind Med J. 2012; 27(4): 332-339.
10.Kowtrakool N. Effects of Using a Case Management System to improve the quality of care for the Sepsis Patients in Sakaeo Crown Prince Hospital. Thai Journal of Cardio Thoracic Nursing. 2014; 25(2): 120-134.
11.Nueng-na-suwan W, Normkusol J, Thongjam R, Panaput T. Development of the Nursing Service System for Patients with Severe Sepsis. Journal of Nursing and Health Care. 2014; 32(2): 25-36.
12.Chairatana P, Tudsapornpitakul S. The Effectiveness of Nursing Care Model for Sepsis Patients. Journal of Nursing and Health Care. 2017; 35(3): 224-231.
13.Amphon K, Bunyoprakarn C, Sinkincharoen P. The Outcome of the Development of the Patients with Septicemia, Prapokklao Hospital.J prapokklao Hosp Clin Med Educat Center. 2017; 34(3): 222-236.
14.Jeffery AD, Mutsch KS, Knapp L. Knowledge and recognition of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis among pediatric nurses. Pediatric Nursing. 2014; 40(6): 271-278.
15.Chafin DB, Trzeciak S, Likourezos A, Baumann BM, Dellinger RP. Impact of delayed transfer of
critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35: 1477-83.