Effectiveness of Maneevej Sitting Position Technique on Labor Pain, Time During Active Phase and Perception of Childbirth Experience of Parturients


  • Panuttita Khoonboonyung Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Bangkok, Faculty of nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Thailand
  • Kesorn Suvithayasiri Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Bangkok, Faculty of nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Thailand
  • Luckana Buasomboon Nakhonpathom hospital, Nakhonpathom, Thailand
  • Wandee Sriiswaang Nakhonpathom hospital, Nakhonpathom, Thailand
  • Nongluk Girdtamai Nakhonpathom hospital, Nakhonpathom, Thailand


Maneevej sitting position, active phase of labor, perception of childbirth experience


Introduction: Vaginal delivery is a natural process. During the delivery, regular and painful uterine contractions cause progressive dilation and effacement of the cervix. Fear and stress during delivery process usually cause the increasing of Catecholamine and Cortisol hormone. The increase of stress hormones is related to abdominal pain and uterine dysfunction that affect the length of the stage of delivery resulting in a prolong delivery process. These may cause maternal negative experiences in the vaginal delivery and also affect bonding and attachment between maternal and infant in the postpartum period. Research objectives: This research aimed to compare the effects of Maneevej sitting position versus routine nursing care (recumbent position) for women in the first stage of labor on labor pain, duration of active labor period, and perception of childbirth experience. Research methodology: This quasi-experimental research included of 57 participants who had giving birth at Nakornprathom hospital during April-May 2020. Participants were assigned to either an experimental group (n=29) or a control group (n=28). The experimental group received positioning using the Maneevej sitting position as well as routine nursing care while the control group received the routine nursing care only. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, pregnancy recording form, delivery process recording form, pain assessment form, the perception of childbirth experience questionnaire and Maneevej sitting position in parturients program. Descriptive statistics and independent t-tests were used for data analysis. Results: The findings showed that the experimental group had significantly shorter active labor period than the control group (p<.01) and had a higher score on perception of childbirth experience than that of the control group (p< .01). However, there were no statistically significant difference of labor pain while the cervix was 3-4, 5-7 and 8-10 centimeters dilated between the experimental and control groups (p value .97, .72, .29, and p value .55, .41, .25 respectively). Conclusions: This study confirmed the effectiveness of the Maneevej sitting position as it could shorten the duration of active labor and provide more perception of childbirth experience. Implications: Maneevej sitting position is one of the effective positions that can be adopt during labor for women to promote the progression of labor and provide more perception of positive childbirth experience.


Download data is not yet available.


Parisonkul S, Sansiriphan N. Nursing for women in childbirth period. 2nd ed. Chiang Mai: Textbook project, Faculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University; 2010. (in Thai).

Pillitteri A. Maternal & child health nursing: care of the childbearing and childrearing family. 6th ed. PA: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2010.

Gupta S, Kumar, GSA, Singhal H. Acute pain-labour analgesia. Indian J Anaesth 2006; 50(5):363-69.

Mcdonald JS. Obstetric pain. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. Textbook of pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p.1388-414.

Bryant H, Yerby M. Relief of pain during labour. In: Henderson C, Macdonal S, editors. Mayes’ midwifery: a textbook for midwives 13th ed. Edinburgh: Bailliere Tindall; 2004. p. 458-75.

Delivery room, Nakhonpathom Hospital Annual maternity statistics report. Nakhonpathom: Nakhon Pathom Hospital; 2018. (in Thai).

Nystedt A, Hogberg U, Lundman B. The negative birth experience of prolonged labour: A case - referent study. JCN 2005;14(5):579–86.

Simkin PP, Bolding A. Update on nonpharmacologic approaches to relieve labor pain and prevent suffering. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004;49(6):489-504.

Wong DL, Perry SE, Hockenberry MJ, Lowdermilk DL. Maternal child nursing care. St. Louis: Mosby;2002.

Ricci SS. Essentials of maternity, newborn, and women’s health nursing. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Smyth RMD. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 21];5(5):1-99. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC6484432/

WHO Reproductive Health Library. WHO recommendation on duration of the first stage of labour [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Nov 21]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272447/WHO-RHR-18.12-eng.pdf?sequence=1

Duangmani K, Somsap Y, Ingkathawornwong T, Kala S. Effects of modified Bhadrasana pose on labor pain and duration of active phase in parturients. Prince of Naradhiwas University Journal 2017;9(1):35-49. (in Thai).

Ningsanond N. Simple way to make life easier…by Maneeveda. JST 2011;3(5):1-13. (in Thai).

Saejiaw A. The development of integrative care with maneology in the first pregnancy of Surat Thani hospital. Region 11 Medical Journal 2017;31:325–37. (in Thai).

Malae N. Effects of using Maneveda practice on time of labor. Sungai Kolok Hospital 2015. (copy document) (in Thai).

Uthairat P, Saejiaw A. The effects of Maneveda practice on labour pain coping and labour time of primigravidarum at Suratthani Hospital. Region 11 Medical Journal 2019; 32(1),791-804. (in Thai).

Waldenstrom U, Borg IM, Olsson B, Skold M, Wall S. The childbirth experience: study of 295 new mothers. Birth [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2019 Nov 21];23:144-53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1996.tb00475.x

Namujju J, Muhindo R, Mselle LT, Waiswa P, Nankumb J, Muwanguzi P. Childbirth experiences and their derived meaning: a qualitative study among postnatal mothers in Mbale regional referral hospital, Uganda. Reprod Health 2018;15(183):1-11.

Marut JS, Mercer RT. Comparison of primipara’s perceptions of vaginal and cesarean births. Nursing Research 1979;28(5):260-66.

Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research : generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Pa: Lippincott, Williams &Wilkins; 2012.

Nungkla N. Effect of childbirth preparation on childbirth experience among primigravidas and supporters [Master of Nursing Science, Nursing Care of Women]. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University; 2003. (in Thai).

Walsh D. Pain and epidural use in normal childbirth. EBM 2009;7(3):89-95.

Waldenstorom U, Hildingsson l, Rubertsson C, Radestad I. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factor in national sample. Birth 2004;31(1):17-27.

Borrirukwanit K, Jindajumnong P, Pomyen S, Junhmaun K, Yusuk K, Seewan T, et al. Effect of Maneevej sitting position technique on labour pain level, duration time of delivery and blood loss in normal labour. J Health Sci 2019;28(3),455-65. (in Thai).

Simkin P. Maternal: position and pelvis revisited. Birth 2002;30(2):130-2.

Munsil J, Sangin S, Suppasr P. Effects of positioning using the Maneevada knowledge program on duration of active labor and satisfaction with childbirth of primiparous women. Nursing Journal of the Ministry of Public Health 2018;101-14. (in Thai).



How to Cite

Khoonboonyung ป, Suvithayasiri เ, Buasomboon ล, Sriiswaang ว, Girdtamai น. Effectiveness of Maneevej Sitting Position Technique on Labor Pain, Time During Active Phase and Perception of Childbirth Experience of Parturients. JHNR [Internet]. 2021 Apr. 9 [cited 2022 Jun. 26];37(1):294-310. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bcnbangkok/article/view/249303



Research articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)