Predictive Factors of Resilience among Elderly Living in Home for the Aged


  • กัลยรัตน์ ศรกล้า
  • วารี กังใจ
  • สหัทยา รัตนจรณะ


resilience, social support, self-esteem, older adults, home for the aged


          Elderly residents in elderly homes experience multiple changes in context and situations in their lives under the limitations and rules of these homes. These changes may affect the ability for the elderly residents to adapt themselves in comparison with the elderly in general. So, resilience in their life is crucial for them. This predictive correlational study aimed to determine the predictive factors of resilience among elderly living in homes for the aged. The participants were 92 older adults living in Thammapakorn Wat Muang and Thammapakorn Pho Klang home for the aged at Nakhon Ratchasima Province. They were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Research instruments included the Self-esteem Scale, the Perceived Health Status Scale, the Optimism Scale, the Interpersonal Relations Scale, the Social Support Scale, and the Resilience Scale, with reliabilities of .73, .82, .70, .76, .91, and .96, respectively. Descriptive statistics, and multiple regression were employed for data analysis.

             The results revealed that the resilience of these elderly residents was at a moderate level (Mean = 121.89, SD = 13.07). Social support and self-esteem could predict resilience for 48.6 % (R2 = .486, p < .01)

             The findings suggested that in designing nursing intervention to promote resilience among elderly, nurses and healthcare professionals should take into account the enhancement of their social support and self-esteem.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Tuntichaivanit C. Life happiness of the elderly in Rayong Province [Master’s thesis]. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 2008. (in Thai)

2. National Statistical Office. The 2014 survey of the older persons in Thailand. 2014 [cited 2017 Sep 17] Available from:

3. Chunharas S. Situation of the Thai elderly 2008. Bangkok: TQP; 2009. (in Thai)

4. Wattana R. The effect of relationship enhancement program on interpersonal relations and life satisfaction among the older adults in home for the aged [Master’s thesis]. Chonburi: Burapha University; 2014. (in Thai)

5. Somphong S. Happiness of the elderlies in nursing homes Nakhon Pathom province [Master’s thesis]. Bangkok: Silpakorn University; 2012. (in Thai)

6. Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the resilience Scale. Journal of nursing measurement. 1993;1(2):165-78.

7. Hengudomsub P. Resilience in later life. Thai Pharmaceutical and Health Science Journal. 2007;2(1):115-23.

8. Wagnild G. Resilience and successful aging: Comparison among low and high income older adults. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2003;1:42-7.

9. Wells M. Resilience in older adults living in rural, suburban, and urban areas. Journal of rural nursing and health care. 2010;10(2):45-54.

10. Choowattanapakorn T, Alex L, Lundman B, Norberg A, Nygren B. Resilience among women and men aged 60 years and over in Sweden and in Thailand. Nursing & health sciences. 2010;12:329-335.

11. Parayat C. Predictive factors of resilience among elderly. The Journal of faculty of nursing Burapha University; 2015;24(2):97-106. (in Thai)

12. Lee H, Brown SL, Mitchell MM, Rchiraldi GR. Correlates of resilience in the face of adversity for Korean women immigrating to the US. Immigrant Minority Health education. 2008;10:415-22.

13. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods. 2009;41:1149-60.

14. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.

15. Jitapunkul S. Principles of geriatric medicine. 2nd ed. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 1999. (in Thai)

16. Kangchai K. Self-esteem self-care agency and quality of life in elderly. [ChonBuri]: Burapha University; 1997. (in Thai)

17. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: University Press; 1965.

18. Teerajetgoon S. The relationship between concept of health, perceived health status and health promotion behaviors of elderly people in rural areas at Trakanphutphon district, Ubon Ratchathani province [Master’s thesis]. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University; 1996. (in Thai)

19. Speake DL, Cowart ME, Pellet K. Health perceptions and lifestyles of the elderly. Research in Nursing and Health. 1989;12(2):93-100.

20. Kulprasutidilok A, Jirawongnusorn S, Chitmanasak N, Supawantanakul D. Path analysis of factors affecting quality of life in the elderly in Bang Khen district, Bangkok. Journal of health science research; 2014;8(2):35-46. (in Thai)

21. Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life Orientation Test. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1994;67:1063-78.

22. Kaeokangwa, S. Thai elderly life satisfaction index a life experience test manual. Chiang Mai: Faculty of humanities department of psychology Chiang Mai University;1991. (in Thai)

23. Tangwong S. Social support and quality of life of the elderly in Thaweewattana district, Bangkok [Master’s thesis]. Nakhonpathom: Christian University; 2004. (in Thai)

24. Krirkgulthorn T. A study of social support and adaptation of the elderly in Moung Saraburi municipal area. [Master’s thesis]. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 1993. (in Thai)

25. Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic medicine. 1976;38(5):300-14.

26. Schaefer C, Coyne JC, Lazarus RS. The health-related functions of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1981;4(4):381-405.

27. Sawatdirak K. Factors related to health related hardiness among elderly with coronary artery disease. Journal of Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Bangkok. 2017;33(1):40-51. (in Thai)



How to Cite

ศรกล้า ก, กังใจ ว, รัตนจรณะ ส. Predictive Factors of Resilience among Elderly Living in Home for the Aged. JHNR [Internet]. 2019 Apr. 5 [cited 2022 Sep. 29];35(2). Available from:



Research articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)