Preliminary Result of Arthroscopic-assisted Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair and Conventional Open Rotator Cuff Repair

Main Article Content

Prakan Choomphupan

Abstract

A Retrospective controlled study in patients with rotator with rotator cuff repair by the arthroscopic - assisted Mini-Open Repair at Lampang Hospital was done to measure the Range of motion of shoulder abcuction, forward flexion, internal rotator snd external toration, visusl analog scale and the two funtion shoulder xdores such as the simple shoulder test (SST) and the constant score (CS) in preoperative and pstperative. A result f the conventional open rotartor cuff method was measured also in the latest follow - up,
13 patients who had an arthroscopie - assisted Mini - Open rotator cuff repair and 11 patients who had a conven-tion open rotator cuff repair wer conducted for this study at the latest follwo-up at average 5.4 months and 16 months respectively. An arthroscopic - assisted Mini - Open method significantly improved the Range of motion in all directions, the reductions in pain scle and ovth the functional shoulder scores in postoperative. We found that an arthroscopic - assisted Mini-Open method had the sasme result with the conventional open method in postopertive.
Conclusion : An arthorscopic - assisted Mini-Open method provided a good result postoperatively even int short
term period

Article Details

How to Cite
Choomphupan, . P. . (2022). Preliminary Result of Arthroscopic-assisted Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair and Conventional Open Rotator Cuff Repair. Lampang Medical Journal, 29(1), 30–42. Retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LMJ/article/view/259943
Section
Original Article

References

L' Insalata JC, Warren RF, Cohen SB, Altchek DW, Peterson MGE. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997 ; 738 - 748.

Michener LA, McLure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons standardized shoulder assessment from, patient self - report section : Reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002 ; 11 : 587 - 594.

Lippitt SB, Harry DT 11, Matsen FA 111. A pratical tool for evaluating function : The Simple Shoulder Test. In : Matsen FA, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ, eds. The shoulder : A balance of mobilty and stability. Rosemont, IL : American Acaswmy of Orthopaedic Surgeonc,

: 501 - 518.

Constant CR, Murley AHG. A clinical method of fonctional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987 : 214 : 214 : 160 - 4.

Zvijac JE, Levy HJ, Lemak LJ> Arthroseopie subcromial decompression in the trealment of full thickness rotator cuff tears : A 3 to 6 years follow up, Arthroscopy 1994 ; 10 ; 518 - 523.

Ken Yamaguchi. Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair : An Updated Perspective. J Bone Joint Surg AM. 2001 ; 83 - : 764 -772.

Fealy S, Kingham TP, Altchek Dw. Mini - Open Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Two-Row Fixation Technique : Outcomes Analasis in Patients With Small. Moderate, and lage Rotater Cuff Tears : Arthroscopy 2002 : 6 : 665 - 670.

Christopher DS, Susan A, Adam MH, et al. Biomechanica Comparison of Single and Double-Row Fixation in Arthroscopic

Rotator Cuff Repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000 : 88 : 2425 - 2431.

Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM. Biomechanical evaluation of artroscopic rotator cuff repairs : double - row compared with single - row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 ; 88 : 403 - 10.

Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JD, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versis cpib;e - rpw suture anchor techinque for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2006 ;l 34 : 407 - 14.

Mansat P. Cofield RK, Kersten TE, Rowland CM. Complications of rotator cuff repair. Orhop Clin North Am. 1997 ; 28 : 205- 13.

Baker Cl, Liu SH, kersten TE, Rowlland CM. Complications of rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med 1995 : 23 ; 99 - 104.

Kirschenbaum D, Coyle MP, Leddy JPk, Katsaros P, Tan F, Cody RP" Shoulder strength with rotator cuff tears. Pre - and postoperative analysis. Clin Orthop. 1993 ; 288 - 174 - 8.

Rokito AS, Zuckerman JD, Gallagher Ma, Cuomo F. Strengt after surgical repair of the rotator cuff. J Shoulder Ellbow Surg. 1996 ; 5 : 12 - 7.

Wandrner JJ, Goitz RJ, Irrgag JJ, Groff YJ. Arthroscope-assisted rotator cuff repair : patient selection and tratment oucome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997 ; 6 : 46372.

Paulos LE, Kody MH. Arthroscopically enhanced "miniapproach" to ratator cuff repair. AM J Sports Med 1994 ; 22 : 19 - 25.

Hersch JC, Sgaglione NA.Arthroscopcially assisted mini-open rotator cuff repairs. Functional outcome at 2 - to 7 - year follow - up. Am J Soprts Med. 2000 May - Jun ; 28(3) : 301 - 11.

Shinners TJ, Noordsij PG, Orwin JF. Arthroscopically Assisted Mini- Open Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy 2002 : 1 : 21 - 26.

Weber SC, Schaefer R. "Mini-open" versus traditional open repair in the managment of small and moderate size tears of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 1993 ; 9 ; 365 - 366.

Hata Y, Saitoh S. Murakami N, Seke H, Nakatsuchi Y, Takaoka K. A less invasive surgery for rotator cuff tear : mini - open repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Jan - Feb ; 10(1) : 11 - 6.

Pollock RG. F;atpw EL. The rotator cuff. Fulff thickness tears : Mini-open repair. Orthop Clin North Am 1997 ; 28 : 169 - 177.

Levy HJ, Urible JW, Delaney LG. Arthorscopic Assiste Rotator Cuff Repair : preliminary results. Arthroscopy 1990 : 6 : 55 - 60.

Rokito AS, Cuomo F, Gallagher MA, Zuckerman JD. Long -term functional outcome of repairs of large and massive chronic tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 ; 81 : 991 - 7.

Bosaotta H, Prnner K. Arthoscopic Assiste Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthorscopy 2004 : 6 : 620 - 626.

Liu SH, Baker CL. Arthroscopically assiste rotator cuff tepair : Correlation of functional reslts with integrity of the cuff arthroscopy,

Athroscopy 1994 : 10 : 54 - 60.

Liu SH =. Arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994 ; 76 : 592 - 595.

Blevins FT. Warren RF, Cavo C, et al. Arthoscopie sddisted rotator cuff trpair : Results using a mini-open deltoid splttting approach.

Arthroscopy 1996 : 12 : 50 - 59.