Randomized-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Andrographis paniculata Powder and Favipiravir for the Treatment of Mild COVID-19

Main Article Content

sirada puriwatthanapong
Sant Chaiyodsilp
Thammarat Bunsoong
Paul Chaiyodsilp
Yathip Tipasaharn
Kamik Kulmanote
Methi Sicharoen
Wasini Mekvitoon
Chompunuch Settapol
Wirawan Polchan
Jariya Songrak
Kobkaew Burapha
Jate Wantang
Cholpatsorn Euathanikkanon

Abstract

Introduction and objective: This study sought to determine the effectiveness of the Andrographosis paniculata (fa thalai chon in Thai) herb, in ground-powder form, in the treatment of COVID-19 compared to favipiravir, which is the current standard treatment regimen in Thailand.


Methods: The study was a randomized controlled trial in subjects aged 18 to under 60 years, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 by a positive RT-PCR test and were recruited from Muaklek Hospital from October 2021 to April 2022 classified as having mild disease. Patients were block randomized into three treatment groups. The first group was treated with ground powder of the aerial parts of A. paniculata (400 mg per capsule containing 11.35 mg of andrographolide) 180 mg/day for 5 days. The second group was treated with ground A. paniculata leaves (400 mg per capsule containing 24 mg of andrographolide) 180 mg/day for 5 days. The third group was treated with favipiravir at a dose of 3,600 mg on day 1 and 1,600 mg/day on days 2 to 5. Patients were followed up for 10 days, with worsening of clinical severity indicated by change in color category, new pulmonary infiltrations on x-ray, and viral load reduction on days 0, 5 and 10 as the primary outcomes.


Results: All 231 subjects were recruited to the study, with 77 assigned to each group. None of the groups had worsening of clinical severity indicated by change in color category. The difference in new pulmonary infiltrations between the groups was not statistically significant (p=0.07), nor was the elevation in liver enzymes (p=0.7). Viral loaded reduction did not differ significantly between each group. Log reduction on day 10 was 3.943 ± 1.354 in the first group, 3.943 ± 1.414 in the second group, and 3.994 ± 1.284 in the third group, which also showed no significant difference (p=0.996).


Discussion:  The efficacy of ground powder of both aerial parts and leaves of A. paniculata was not significantly different from favipiravir in the treatment of COVID-19, whether measured by pulmonary infiltrations on x-ray, change in clinical severity, or viral load reduction, throughout the follow-up period of on days 0, 5 and 10.


Conclusion and recommendation: Comparison of effectiveness between powders of both aerial parts and leaves of A. paniculata shows no significant differences from favipiravir in the treatment of mild COVID-19 apart from the cost, where A. paniculata is more accessible and affordable. The conclusion of the study supports the decision to use A. paniculata powder as first treatment for mild COVID-19.

Article Details

Section
Original Articles

References

Hassanipour S, Arab-Zozani M, Amani B, Heidarzad F, Fathalipour M, Martinez-de-Hoyo R. The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Sci Rep. 2021;11:11022.

Erdem HA, Ekren PK, Çağlayan D, Taşbakan MI, Yamazhan T, Taşbakan MS, Sayıner A, Gökengin D. Treatment of SARS-cov-2 pneumonia with favipiravir: Early results from the Ege University cohort, Turkey. Turk J Med Sci. 2021;51(3):912-20.

Kawasuji H, Tsuji Y, Ogami C, Takegoshi Y, Kaneda M, Murai Y, Kimoto K, Ueno A, Miyajima Y, Fukui Y, Nagaoka K, Sakamaki I, Morinaga Y, Yamamoto Y. Association between high serum favipiravir concentrations and drug-induced liver injury. medRxiv. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256437

Pilkington V, Pepperrell T, Hill A. A review of the safety of Favipiravir – A potential treatment in the COVID-19 pandemic?. J Virus Erad. 2020;6:45-51.

Yaylaci S, Dheir H, Şenocak D, Genc AB, Kocayigit H, Çekiç D, Varım C, Aydın A, Koroglu M, Karabay O. The effects of favipiravir on hematological parameters of covıd-19 patients. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2020;66(Suppl 2):65-70.

Takoi H, Togashi Y, Fujimori D, Kaizuka H, Otsuki S, Wada T, Takeuchi Y, Abe S. Favipiravir-induced fever in coronavirus disease 2019: A report of two cases. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;101:188-90.

Shi TH, Huang YL, Chen CC, Pi WC, Hsu YL, Lo LC, Chen WY, Fu SL, Lin CH. Andrographolide and its fluorescent derivative inhibit the main proteases of 2019-nCoV and SARS-CoV through covalent linkage. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;533(3):467–73.

Benjaponpithak A, Visithanon K, Sawaengtham T, Thaneerat T, Wanaratna K. Short communication on use of andrographis herb (FA THALAI CHON) for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. J Thai Trad Alt Med. 2021:19(1);229-33. (in Thai)

Sa-ngiamsuntorn K, Suksatu A, Pewkliang Y, Thongsri P, Kanjanasirirat P, Manopwisedjaroen S, Charoensutthivarakul S, Wongtrakoongate P, Pitiporn S, Chaopreecha J, Kongsomros S, Jearawuttanakul K, Wannalo W, Khemawoot P, Chutipongtanate S, Borwornpinyo S, Thitithanyanont A, Hongeng S. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Activity of Andrographis paniculata extract and its major component andrographolide in human lung epithelial cells and cytotoxicity evaluation in major organ cell representatives. J Nat Prod. 2021;84(4):1261–70.

Prempree P, Mungaomklang A, Tangkiatkumjai M, Phodha T, Kwankhao P, Chewchuapun K, Charuenporn C, Monta D, Karapakdee T. SARS-CoV-2 clearance from Andrographis paniculata, Boesenbergia rotunda, and favipiravir among mild COVID-19 cases in Klong Prem Central Prison during mid-2021: a retrospective study. OSIR. 2022;15(4):131-7.

Wanaratna K, Leethong P, Inchai N, Chueawiang W, Sriraksa P, Tabmee A, Sirinavin S. Efficacy and safety of Andrographis paniculata extract in patients with mild COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med Res. 2022;5(3):423-7.

Suwankesawong W, Saokaew S, Permsuwan U, Chaiyakunapruk N. Characterization of hypersensitivity reactions reported among Andrographis paniculata users in Thailand using Health Product Vigilance Center (HPVC) database. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:515.

Leelarasamee A, Suankratay C, Hunnangkul S, Udompunturak S, Krittayaphong R, Poonsrisawat J, Wongsakorn N, Ittipanitphong C, Sirimai S, Prakairoongthong P, Rattanamaneekorn S, Chaicharoenpong K. The efficacy and safety of Andrographis paniculata extract for the treatment of acute nonspecific upper respiratory tract infections: A randomized double blind placebo controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2021;104(7):1204-13.

Rattanaraksa D, Khempetch R, Poolwiwatchaikool U, Nimitvilai S, Loatrakul O, Srimanee P. The efficacy and safety of Andrographis paniculata extract for treatment of COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms, Nakhonpathom Hospital. Region 4-5 Medical Journal. 2021;40(2):269-82. (in Thai)

Worakunphanich W, Thavorncharoensap M, Youngkong S, Thadanipon K, Thakkinstian A. Safety of Andrographis paniculata: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30:727–39.

Kaewdech A, Nawalerspanya S, Assawasuwannakit S, Chamroonkul N, Jandee S, Sripongpun P. The use of Andrographis paniculata and its effects on liver biochemistry of patients with gastrointestinal problems in Thailand during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross sectional study. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):18213.

Tanwettiyanont J, Piriyachananusorn N, Sangsoi L, Boonsong B, Sunpapoa C, Tanamatayarat P, et al. Use of Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall. Ex Nees and risk of pneumonia in hospitalised patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022:9:947373.