Education Administration Model for 21st Century Skills Development of Nursing Students
รูปแบบการบริหารการศึกษา เพื่อพัฒนาทักษะการเรียนรู้ในศตวรรษที่ 21 ของนักศึกษาพยาบาล
Keywords:
Education Administration Model, The 21st Century Skills of Nursing StudentsAbstract
Abstract
The purpose of this research to develop the education administration model to promote the 21st century skills of nursing students, and to evaluate effectiveness of the education administration model. The research and development study; 1) situation and guidelines analysis for education administration; 2) education administration model development; 3) experiment of the model; and 4) effectiveness evaluation of the model. The populations were 284 nursing students of academic year 2018 in Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Chainat. The following instruments were used to collect data: 1) the 21st century skills questionnaire; and 2) the evaluation form of the model effectiveness 3) the satisfaction on using the model. The results of the development found that the model consisted of three aspects. The first, The Orientation Model including: 1) goal of the model to develop the 21st century skills and 2) concept as participative administration and quality cycle. The second, The education administration model, 4S-“PSPS-PRACTICE”, which included 4S as the main structure and PSPS as the sub-stage in each structure.S1: Strategic management, S2: A paradigm shift for 21st century, S3: Learning strategic management which was important; therefore the guideline was developed as “PRACTICE” including: 1) P: Preparation for learning; 2) RA: Relationship skills and Awareness; 3) C: Create of Concepts; 4) TI: Take to Implement; 5) C: Continuous Active Learning; and 6) E: Evaluation, and S4: Learning Society. The third aspect was the model implementation which presented as the strategies development for education administration.
The outcomes of model implementation revealed that as follows:
- The mean scores of overall the 21st century skills before model implementation (Mean=3.50) were significantly higher than after model implementation (Mean=3.83). When considered in each skill of the 21st century skills, it was found that the mean scores of every skill were significantly higher than before the model implementation (p<.05).
- The results of the model effectiveness revealed that overall satisfaction towards model implementation was high mean scores level (Mean=02). The mean scores of satisfaction toward course teaching before model implementation (Mean=4.24) were significantly higher than after model implementation (Mean=4.37). The mean scores of satisfaction toward learning environment before model implementation (Mean=3.19) were significantly higher than after model implementation (Mean=3.57) (p<.05).
References
1. Pruettikul, S. Educational Administration for Change in 21st Century. Journal of Education, 2017; 28(2): 36-49. (in Thai)
2. Guofang, W. and Dianne, M.G. Bringing Schools into the 21st Century. Springer Science & Business Media B.V., 2011.
3. Saraketrin, A., Rongmuang, D., Chantra, R.
Nursing Education in the 21st Century: Competencies and Roles of Nursing Instructors. Journal of the Royal Thai Army Nurses, 2019; 20(1): 12-20. (in Thai)
4. Kanyaprasith, K. Socio-scientific Issues for 21st Century Skills. Journal of education, 2015; 26(3): 1-9. (in Thai)
5. Sinlarat, P. The Crisis in Education:
Idea Solution for Fixing. 2nd ed. Bangkok: Dhurakij Pundit University, 2013. (in Thai)
6. Joyce, M. Weil and Showers, M. Models of Teaching. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1992.
7. Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Gibson, J. L. Management: Principles and Functions. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Richard D. Irwin, 1989.
8. Tunsoungneon, B. Strategic Management in Education. “Graduate School Conference 2018”, 2018; 1(2): 322. (in Thai)
9. Nichols, R. J. 4 Essential Rules of 21st Century Learning [online]. 2019 [cited 2019/1/12]. Available from: https://www.teachthought.com/learning/4-essential-rules-of-21st-century-learning/
10. Pinitchan, O. Development of the Knowledge Management Model in Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Chainat. Journal of Nursing Division, 2019; 46(2). (in Thai)
11. Phuttaldong, P. Development Model of Knowledge Management in Poly-technical College in the Lower Northern Region. Journal of Graduate Studies in Northern Rajabhat Universities, 2015; 5(extra): 71. (in Thai)
12. Nearnhad, C. Knowledge Management for Self Development and Work Creation: A Case Study of Support Staff at Phrapokklao Nursing College. Chanthaburi Journal of Phrapokklao Nursing College, 2018; 29(2): 217. (in Thai)
13. Ploysaeng, K. Student-centered Learning. Mahachula Academic Journal, 2018; 5(extra): 13-14. (in Thai)
14. Phattanamatada, V. Strategic Learning Management [online]. 2018 [cited 2018/5/16]. Available from: http://www.kansuksa.com/45/ (in Thai)
15. Fogarty, R. J. & Pete, B. M. 21st Century Skills Rethinking How Student Learn. The United States of America: Solution Tree, 2010.
16. Nongyao, A., et al. Model of School Administration for Developing Students’ Learning Skill in the 21st Century. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2017; (10)1. (in Thai)
17. Mezirow, J. Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
18. Mc Allister, M. STAR: A Transformative Learning Framework for Nurse Educators. Journal of Transformative Education, 2011; 9(1): 42-58.
19. Poohongthong, C. Transformative Learning: Challenges for Instructors in Higher Education. Journal of Behavioral Science, 2018; 24(1): 165. (in Thai)
