Enhancing Emergency Nursing Practices for Spinal Cord Injury patients

Authors

  • Duangjai Poolpholamnuay Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital
  • Siriporn Chitsungnoen Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital
  • Chattong Websoongnoen Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital
  • Wasana Yimnoun Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital
  • Natchanicha Sukpanphong Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital
  • Panita Khumprathom Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital
  • Pantamon Suparee Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital

Keywords:

emergency and trauma nursing, spinal cord injury, nursing practice guideline

Abstract

This action research aimed to develop nursing practice guidelines for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury in the emergency department and to evaluate the effectiveness of the guidelines on nursing outcomes, as well as to examine nurses’ satisfaction with their implementation. The study sample consisted of 40 patients aged 18 years and older with traumatic spinal cord injury and 60 registered nurses working in an emergency department. The research instruments included the nursing practice guidelines, a guideline adherence assessment form, a nursing outcomes record form, and a nurse satisfaction questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, Chi-square tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for comparisons.

The results showed that the developed nursing practice guidelines for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury in the emergency department was at an acceptable level, with quality scores in each domain ranging from 72.22% to 93.33%. When comparing nursing outcomes between the comparison group and the guideline implementation group, the incidences of autonomic dysreflexia, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and pressure ulcers were not significantly different (p > .05). In addition, the length of stay in the emergency department was not significantly different between the two groups (p > .05). However, the length of hospital stay in the guideline implementation group was significantly shorter than in the comparison group. The median length of stay in the guideline implementation group was 17 days, compared with 52 days in the comparison group. Furthermore, nurses demonstrated a high level of adherence to the guidelines (93.01%) and their overall satisfaction with the guidelines was at the highest level. It is recommended that the nursing practice guidelines be periodically reviewed and updated based on evidence-based practice. In addition, the implementation of the guidelines should be expanded to other related units, and follow-up studies on patients’ self-care after discharge should be conducted to improve their quality of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Callcut RA, Kornblith, Cnriy AS, Robles AJ, Meizoso JP, Namias N, et al. The why and how our trauma patients die: A prospective Multicenter Western Trauma Association study. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2019;86(5):864-70. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002205

LaGrone L, Riggle K, Joshipura M, Quansah R, Reynolds T, Sherr K, et al. Uptake of the World Health Organization's trauma care guidelines: A systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2016;94(8):585-98. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.162214

Linsenmeyer TA, Gibbs K, Solinsky R. Autonomic Dysreflexia After Spinal Cord Injury: Beyond the Basics. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports. 2020;8:443-51. doi: 10.1007/s40141-020-00300-5

Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima hospital. Personnel Information of Nursing Department Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima hospital. Nakhon Ratchasima: Information and Communication Technology Center Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima hospital; 2024. (in Thai)

Pearkao C, Khunjamnongpak S. Patient outcomes after application of clinical nursing practice guideline for mild traumatic brain injury patients. Songklanagarind Journal of Nursing. 2021;41(4):15-26. (in Thai)

Lowa Model Collaborative, Buckwalter KC, Cullen L, Hanrahan K, Kleiber C, McCarthy AM, et al. Lowa model of evidence-based practice: Revisions and validation. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2017;14(3):175–82. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12223

Kemmis S, McTaggart R. The action research reader. 3th ed. Geelong: Deakin University Press; 1990.

Saisema W, Rerngkhumglu S. Development and evaluation of clinical nursing practice guidelines for multiple trauma Patient, Nakhon Pathom Hospital. The Journal of Boromarjonani College of Nursing, Suphanburi. 2023;6(1):97-114. (in Thai)

Thato R. Nursing research: Concepts to Application. 3th ed. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 2018. (in Thai)

Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical Appraisal Tools [Internet]. Australia; 2010 [cited 2025 Nov 22]. Available form: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

Institute of Medical Research & Technology Assessment. Appraisal of Guideline for Research & Evaluation II; AGREE II. Bangkok: Government organization; 2013. (in Thai)

American College of Surgeons. ATLS advanced trauma life support student course manual. 11th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2025.

Medical Service Department. Emergency medical protocol under medical direction. Bangkok; 2023. (in Thai)

Outer North East London Community Service. Guideline for the Use of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). England. 2014.

Saksriwatana K, Ratanamaitrekeart R, Anannaweenusorn J, Chongjarearn A. Development of nursing practice guideline among spine surgery patients in Chonburi Hospital. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2020;21(1):376-82. (inThai)

Kuramapirak N. The emergency nurse practitioner roles with hemorrhage shock in trauma : Challenge in prevention and pre-hospital care of traumatic. Journal of Health and food creation. 2023;1(2):54–63. (in Thai)

Phanwan S, Borvornsudhasin P. The development of a fast track of care for multiple injury in Suratthani Hospital. Region 11 Medical Journal. 2021;36(1):32-49. (in Thai)

Sanchez SAJ, Sharif S, Costa F, Rangel RJA, Anania CD, Zileli M. Early management of spinal cord injury: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. Neurospine. 2020;17(4):759-84. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040366.183

Karunarathna I, Gunasena P, Hapuarachchi T, Gunathilake S. The crucial role of data collection in research: Techniques, challenges, and best practices, UVA Clinical Research; 2024.10:95-111.

Sirisreetreerux N. Approach in multiple trauma and orthopeadic emergency condition. Text Book Orthopaedic Trauma. Bangkok: Mihadol University, Medical Education; 2019. (in Thai)

Breevaart OJ, Loey NEV, Leenen PLH, Schoonhoven L, Ham WHW. Emergency medical service nurses' experiences and perspectives on a protocol change of pre-hospital preventive immobilization of spinal injuries after trauma: A qualitative study. International Emergency Nursing. 2025;78:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101533

Thaweekul S. The development of nursing services system of traffic accident patients care in life-threatening condition. Case study of Chiangraiprachanukrao hospital, Chiangrai province. Journal of Department of Health Service Support. 2018;13(2):30-8. (in Thai)

Khamla A, Wongwatanarerk W, Chularee S, Chairanai C, Kaewta K. The Development of care model to prevent surgical site infection for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft using evidence-based practice. Journal of Nursing and Health Care. 2017;35(2):34-44. (in Thai)

Downloads

Published

2026-03-24

How to Cite

1.
Poolpholamnuay D, Chitsungnoen S, Websoongnoen C, Yimnoun W, Sukpanphong N, Khumprathom P, Suparee P. Enhancing Emergency Nursing Practices for Spinal Cord Injury patients. J Nurs Ther Care [internet]. 2026 Mar. 24 [cited 2026 Apr. 4];44(1):e286084. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jnat-ned/article/view/286084