Development of a Self-Screening Tool for Preterm Birth Risk in Pregnant Women

Authors

  • Chanatcha Ubahad Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University
  • Nilubon Rujiraprasert Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University

Keywords:

preterm birth, self-screening, research and development

Abstract

This research and development project aimed to develop a self-screening tool for preterm birth risk in pregnant women. The study was divided into two phases: Phase 1 was an environmental analysis and literature review to develop the risk self-screening form; Phase 2 was the examination of the reliability of the developed form. The hospitals selected as data collection sited were chosen using a stratified random sampling method. The sample consisted of 35 pregnant women who received antenatal care services at a hospital under the Public Health Office of Sisaket Province. The participants were selected by consecutive sampling. Data was collected using the developed self-screening of preterm birth risk assessment which had a content validity of 1. The results were analyzed using inter-rater reliability statistics with the test-retest method.

The literature search retrieved a total of 9,487 articles from databases (PubMed 1,845 articles, CINAHL 897 articles, Scorpus 930 articles, Google Scholar 3,452 articles, Cochrane 104 articles, the certified database of Thai-Journal Citation Index Centre of Thailand 109 articles).,These articles were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, leaving 22 articles for the development of the assessment, which consisted of 33 risk factors for preterm birth, divided into 4 parts as follows: 1) general information of pregnant women, 2) chronic diseases, 3) obstetric history, and 4) history of current pregnancy. These risk factors were refined into a 28-item self-risk screening instrument that pregnant women could answer as “yes or no”, and a 5-item clinical screening form conducted by medical personnel. The result of the analysis of the reliability of the self-screening form using the Intra-class correlation coefficient statistics found that the correlation coefficient of each aspect and the whole version was equal to 1.00 (ICC = 1.00, p < .001). Therefore, it is possible to use the developed self-screening form for preterm birth risk assessment in practice by having pregnant women fill-in the self-screening assessment in order to provide appropriate care as needed and to prevent preterm birth. However, before using it, differenced in the consistency and accuracy of the screenings performed by pregnant women and health care providers should be studied to increase confidence in the screening form.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prediction and prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: ACOG practice bulletin, number 234. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138(2):e65–90.

Jin JH, Lee SA, Yoon SW. Medical utilization and costs in preterm infants in the first 6 years of life after discharge from neonatal intensive care unit: a nationwide population-based study in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37(12):e93.

World Health Organization. Preterm birth [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Dec 22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth

Ministry of Public Health. Health Data Center: Percentage of Thai women giving birth prematurely in fiscal year 2023, Sisaket province [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2022 Jan 22]. Available from: https://ssk.hdc.moph.go.th/hdc/reports/report.php?cat_id=1ed90bc32310b503b7ca9b32af425ae5&id=ecdbfc8b4725386c34623ce99f0f4b8d (in Thai)

Maternal and Child Health Board. Guideline for pregnant women and childbirth, Sisaket. Sisaket: Sisaket Provincial Public Health Office; 2022. (in Thai)

Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RTCOG Clinical practice guideline: 50th Anniversary Edition of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Thailand. Bangkok: RTCOG; 2022. (in Thai)

Xiu Y, Lin Z, Pan M. Development and validation of a risk prediction model for spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Transl Res. 2024;16(11): 6500-9.

Saade GR, Boggess KA, Sullivan SA, Markenson GR, Iams JD, Coonrod DV, et al. Development and validation of a spontaneous preterm delivery predictor in asymptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(5):633.e1-633.e24.

Ferreira A, Bernardes J, Gonçalves H. Risk scoring systems for preterm birth and their performance: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(13):4360.

Salunkhe AH, Salunkhe JA, Mohite VR, More U, Pratinidhi AK, Kakade SV. Development of risk scoring scale tool for prediction of preterm birth. Indian J Community Med. 2019;44(2):102–6.

Miller DP, Foley KL, Bundy R, Dharod A, Wright E, Dignan M, et al. Universal screening in primary care practices by self-administered tablet vs nursing staff. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3):e221480.

Toquinto SM, Berglas NF, McLemore MR, Delgado A, Roberts SCM. Pregnant women’s acceptability of alcohol, tobacco, and drug use screening and willingness to disclose use in prenatal care. Women's Health Issues. 2020;30(5):345–52.

Azadnajafabad S, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Rezaei N, Ghasemi E, Naderimagham S, Azmin M, et al. A report on statistics of an online self-screening platform for COVID-19 and its effectiveness in Iran. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(7):1069–77.

Liu S, Li J, Wan DY, Li R, Qu Z, Hu Y, et al. Effectiveness of eHealth self-management interventions in patients with heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(9):e38697.

Sandhu A, Mosli M, Yan B, Wu T, Gregor J, Chande N, et al. Self-screening for malnutrition risk in outpatient inflammatory bowel disease patients using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(4):507–10.

Ubahad C, Supon M. Results of the development of a screening form for premature birth risk, Sisaket province. Sisaket Journal of Research and Health Development. 2023;2(Suppl. 2):73-82. (in Thai)

Nobelius D. Managing R&D processes-focusing on technology development, product development, and their interplay [Dissertation]. Göteborg: Department of Operations Management and Work Organization School of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology; 2020.

Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2014 edition. Adelaide: JBI; 2014.

Pubrica Academy. PCC Research question framework [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 22]. Available from: https://pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/pcc-research-question-framework/

Thanomsieng N. Relative risk & odds ratio. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Jan 22]. Available from: https://www.coursehero.com/file/44876371/Relative-Risk-Odds-Ratiopdf/ (in Thai)

Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI Levels of evidence [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2022 Aug 10]. Available from: https://kku.world/a8a05

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:71.

Punyapornwithaya V. Sample size calculation using G*power program for research using animals. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 10]. Available from: https://kku.world/rk39ld (in Thai)

Cohen JM, Uphoff NT. Rural development participation: concepts and measures for project design, implementation and evaluation. Ithaca (NY): Rural Development Committee, Center for International Studies, Cornell University; 1977.

Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017.

McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):276–82.

Harron K, Verfuerden M, Ibiebele I, Liu C, Kopp A, Guttmann A, et al. Preterm birth, unplanned hospital contact, and mortality in infants born to teenage mothers in five countries: an administrative data cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020;34(6):645–54.

Jiang M, Mishu MM, Lu D, Yin X. A case control study of risk factors and neonatal outcomes of preterm birth. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57(6):814–8.

Acharya D, Gautam S, Poder TG, Lewin A, Gaussen A, Lee K, et al. Maternal and dietary behavior-related factors associated with preterm birth in Southeastern Terai, Nepal: a cross sectional study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:946657.

Stylianou-Riga P, Kouis P, Kinni P, Rigas A, Papadouri T, Yiallouros PK, et al. Maternal socioeconomic factors and the risk of premature birth and low birth weight in Cyprus: a case-control study. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):157.

Zong X, Wang H, Yang L, Guo Y, Zhao M, Magnussen CG, et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index categories and infant birth outcomes: a population-based study of 9 million mother-infant pairs. Front Nutr. 2022;9:789833.

Scott KA, Chambers BD, Baer RJ, Ryckman KK, McLemore MR, Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL. Preterm birth and nativity among Black women with gestational diabetes in California, 2013-2017: a population-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):593.

Wedlund F, von Wowern E, Hlebowicz J. Increased cesarean section rate and premature birth according to modified WHO maternal cardiovascular risk in pregnant women with congenital heart disease. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0294323.

Hanif A, Ashraf T, Pervaiz MK, Guler N. Prevalence and risk factors of preterm birth in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(4):577–82.

Soundarajan P, Muthuramu P, Veerapandi M, Mariappan R. Retrospective study factors related to preterm birth in Government Raja Mirasudar hospital and obstetric and perinatal outcome. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;5(9):3006–11.

Kinpoon K, Chaiyarach S. The incidence and risk factors for preterm delivery in northeast Thailand. Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2021;29(2):100–11. (in Thai)

Liu D, Lin G, Qu M, Alexander JM. Socioeconomic impacts on the intergenerational associations of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):7173–8.

Suff N, Xu VX, Glazewska-Hallin A, Carter J, Brennecke S, Shennan A. Previous term emergency caesarean section is a risk factor for recurrent spontaneous preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;271:108–11

Nyamasege CK, Kimani-Murage EW, Wanjohi M, Kaindi DWM, Ma E, Fukushige M, et al. Determinants of low birth weight in the context of maternal nutrition education in urban informal settlements, Kenya. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2019;10(2):237–45.

Brhane M, Hagos B, Abrha MW, Weldearegay HG. Does short inter-pregnancy interval predicts the risk of preterm birth in Northern Ethiopia? BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):405.

Cavoretto P, Candiani M, Giorgione V, Inversetti A, Abu-Saba MM, Tiberio F, et al. Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment: Meta-analysis of cohort studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):43-53.

Pérez-Molina JJ, González-Cruz MJ, Panduro-Barón JG, Santibáñez-Escobar LP, Quezada-Figueroa NA, Bedolla-Barajas M. Enfermedad periodontal como factor de riesgo adicional asociado con nacimiento pretérmino en México: Un estudio de casos Y controles. Gac Med Mex. 2019;155(2):143–8.

Pun KD, Rishal P, Darj E, Infanti JJ, Shrestha S, Lukasse M, et al. Domestic violence and perinatal outcomes - a prospective cohort study from Nepal. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):671.

El-Shahawy O, Labib K, Stevens E, Kahn LG, Anwar W, Oncken C, et al. Exclusive and dual cigarette and hookah smoking is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes among pregnant women in Cairo, Egypt. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(24):12974.

Admon LK, Bart G, Kozhimannil KB, Richardson CR, Dalton VK, Winkelman TNA. Amphetamine- and opioid-affected births: incidence, outcomes, and costs, United States, 2004-2015. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(1):148–54.

Fabricant SP, Greiner KS, Caughey AB. Trauma in pregnancy and severe adverse perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(18):3070–4.

Ahmadi A, Ramazanzadeh R, Sayehmiri K, Sayehmiri F, Amirmozafari N. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infections with preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):240.

Souza RT, Costa ML, Mayrink J, Feitosa FE, Filho EAR, Leite DF, et al. Clinical and epidemiological factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth: a multicentre cohort of low risk nulliparous women. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):855.

Uwambaye P, Munyanshongore C, Rulisa S, Shiau H, Nuhu A, Kerr MS. Assessing the association between periodontitis and premature birth: a systematic review case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):204.

Li Y, Fu X, Guo X, Liang H, Cao D, Shi J. Maternal preterm birth prediction in the United States: a case-control database study. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22(1):547.

Kassahun EA, Gebreyesus SH, Tesfamariam K, Endris BS, Roro MA, Getnet Y, Hassen HY, Brusselaers N, Coenen S. Development and validation of a simplified risk prediction model for preterm birth: a prospective cohort study in rural Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):4845.

Watson HA, Seed PT, Carter J, Hezelgrave NL, Kuhrt K, Tribe RM, Shennan AH. Development and validation of predictive models for QUiPP App v.2: tool for predicting preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(3):348-56.

Seto MTY, Ko JKY, Cheung KW, To KKW, Hui PW, Lao TT, et al. The accuracy of self-screening of group B streptococcus in pregnant women-a randomized crossover study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(6):792–7.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-06

How to Cite

1.
Ubahad C, Rujiraprasert N. Development of a Self-Screening Tool for Preterm Birth Risk in Pregnant Women. J Nurs Ther Care [internet]. 2025 Feb. 6 [cited 2026 Jan. 24];43(1):e275755. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jnat-ned/article/view/275755